Carly Marie
897 posts


@Chase_Senior Tuscany Italy sounds amazing to me , or Barcelona Spain
English

@crystalscuor Sorry for your loss. My mom just passed so I understand
English

I disagree. I don’t think he is ugly at all. Plus he is focused on his health which many men don’t put as a priority! I think he gives realistic and objective commentary. 49ers have higher expectations because of their elite history and he doesn’t want them to falter, and will comment when they fall short.
English

@Chase_Senior I doubt it, you post obnoxious bait posts for clicks and you're ugly
English

@Chase_Senior @LilHurl Especially in California ! My brother was so upset visiting here from out of state. He couldn’t believe our food and gas prices
English

Something is rotten in Santa Clara.
The 49ers draft process isn’t just off, it’s systematically broken. The 2026 class is just the latest entry in a 5+ year pattern of pissing down their own leg.
Here's a summary of the 2026 class:
- A 60-pick reach in Round 2.
- A flawed “need” player over higher-upside talent.
- And, of course, the "Shanahan classic:" a RB taken 40-70 spots earlier than expected while premium positions sit untouched.
This isn’t misfortunate. It’s a pronounced, fundamental failure to understand value and evaluate talent. One reach is defensible. Doing it every year, while consistently flaunting the board, is malpractice.
Take Stribling: the Niners passed on higher-graded players at positions of need - Bisontis, T.J. Parker, Kayden McDonald, Cashius Howell, C.J. Allen, Colton Hood (all who went within the next 8-9 picks) - to draft a traits-based WR projected for the middle of Round 3, if not later. Best case, he develops into a good player but contributes nothing this year while immediate impact options at guard or edge go elsewhere.
Then they trade back from 58, passing on players like Anthony Hill and Keyron Crawford, only to land Romello Height, a 25-year-old with a capped ceiling. Even if he produces, the opportunity cost is glaring. You don’t pass on young, ascending talent for marginal contributors unless you’ve got a broken framework for evaluating talent.
And then the signature move: reaching ~60 picks for Kaelon Black. A fine player, sure, but with no distinguishing traits (call him Jordan James redux...but taken 60 picks earlier). A Day 3 back taken on Day 2 while OL (Trey Zuhn, Gennings Dunker), WR (Chris Bell), EDGE (Barham), and S (Jalon Kilgore) talent remained on the board. It’s not just suboptimal, it’s flat-out incoherent.
At some point, this stops being debatable. Under @JohnLynch49ers, this regime has gone 6 drafts without producing a single Pro Bowl player. The results aren’t unlucky; they’re consistent. And consistently mediocre at best (see 2024/2025) and disastrous (2021, 2022 and 2023) at worst.
@JedYork, tolerating this is a choice. And that choice is settling for permanent underachievement. Enough is enough.
cc: @grantcohn @sportslarryk @Chase_Senior @SharpFootball @dieter @hutchdiesel
English

Best Available for the #49ers at 33 (if they don't trade it)
Emmanuel McNeil-Warren
Denzel Boston
Zion Young
Cashius Howell
Chase Bisontis
Zachariah Branch
Chris Brazzell Jr
Gabe Jacas
Who do you like?
English

@omgsidewalks Yes especially after health issues late in life that start
English

@lady_valor_07 Yes . And I got to see where my height came from ! She was over 6 ft tall
English

@KVN_03 A man who won’t put down a toilet seat in the home !!!! Makes me so mad
English


















