Casey Modell

Our pilot of new incentives to remove failed asylum seeking families will save taxpayers up to £20 million. Here's why 👇 1. It costs 158k to put up a family of 3 in an asylum hotel for 1 year. It costs 48k more to forcibly remove someone. A 10k per person incentive, up to a max of 40k per family, will save money. 2. If someone refuses an incentive, we will move to a forced removal. If you have no right to be in this country, you should not be allowed to stay. 3. There is nothing new about incentive payments. The Tories did it. Even Reform say they will do it. 4. Higher incentives have worked in Denmark. 95% of returns there are voluntary. 5. These incentives are not a pull factor. Asylum claims in Denmark are at a 40-year low. And asylum seekers spend tens of thousands of pounds getting to this country, that's more than any incentive payment. 6. This is a pilot of 150 families. We will see if it works and scale it if it does. That's taking a smart approach, that saves taxpayers' money, to restoring order at our borders. I make no apology for doing that.

Our pilot of new incentives to remove failed asylum seeking families will save taxpayers up to £20 million. Here's why 👇 1. It costs 158k to put up a family of 3 in an asylum hotel for 1 year. It costs 48k more to forcibly remove someone. A 10k per person incentive, up to a max of 40k per family, will save money. 2. If someone refuses an incentive, we will move to a forced removal. If you have no right to be in this country, you should not be allowed to stay. 3. There is nothing new about incentive payments. The Tories did it. Even Reform say they will do it. 4. Higher incentives have worked in Denmark. 95% of returns there are voluntary. 5. These incentives are not a pull factor. Asylum claims in Denmark are at a 40-year low. And asylum seekers spend tens of thousands of pounds getting to this country, that's more than any incentive payment. 6. This is a pilot of 150 families. We will see if it works and scale it if it does. That's taking a smart approach, that saves taxpayers' money, to restoring order at our borders. I make no apology for doing that.

Our pilot of new incentives to remove failed asylum seeking families will save taxpayers up to £20 million. Here's why 👇 1. It costs 158k to put up a family of 3 in an asylum hotel for 1 year. It costs 48k more to forcibly remove someone. A 10k per person incentive, up to a max of 40k per family, will save money. 2. If someone refuses an incentive, we will move to a forced removal. If you have no right to be in this country, you should not be allowed to stay. 3. There is nothing new about incentive payments. The Tories did it. Even Reform say they will do it. 4. Higher incentives have worked in Denmark. 95% of returns there are voluntary. 5. These incentives are not a pull factor. Asylum claims in Denmark are at a 40-year low. And asylum seekers spend tens of thousands of pounds getting to this country, that's more than any incentive payment. 6. This is a pilot of 150 families. We will see if it works and scale it if it does. That's taking a smart approach, that saves taxpayers' money, to restoring order at our borders. I make no apology for doing that.

An NVIDIA powered farming machine uses Al vision and precision lasers to eliminate weeds in milliseconds without herbicides and without harming crops, a potential shift toward chemical free agriculture

The European Parliament has approved a report calling for trans women to be fully recognized as women throughout the EU.

Parliament voted 364 to 111 AGAINST a national inquiry into organised child exploitation. Not a debate about resources. Not a delay. A flat-out rejection. If there’s nothing to hide… why block the investigation?

Viktor Orbán has long since transformed Hungary into a post-democratic autocracy – and now he's resorting to the dirtiest toolbox of the Putin regime: kompromat through sex blackmail. That the most powerful man in the country – or his inner circle – is orchestrating a suspected honey trap using intelligence techniques to destroy his most promising challenger before the election with an intimate video is not a regrettable slip-up. It's the hallmark of a regime that views any democratic debate as an existential threat and therefore responds with dirty, totalitarian methods.

Raised in a council house Sir Jim Ratcliffe went on to make billions and poured a chunk of into his boyhood club Man United, so when he says the UK has been “colonised” by immigrants who are “ costing too much money” he is to be listened to. Certainly in some parts of the country the density of migrants makes you wonder if you are still in Britain. You can be sure critics ( Gary Neville will be quick out of the trap) will focus on the fact he now lives as a tax exile Monaco. Let me point out he and his company have paid more tax to our exchequer over the years than all his critics put together. And if I had been as successful as Ratcliffe I wouldn’t hang around the UK for two minutes to see how Starmer and PaedosRUs chums were planning to spend my money.