Cat D

25.3K posts

Cat D

Cat D

@CathDebboun

REFORM WILL MAKE THIS COUNTRY GREAT AGAIN 👍

Merseyside Katılım Mart 2013
1.7K Takip Edilen1.2K Takipçiler
Cat D retweetledi
Matt Goodwin
Matt Goodwin@GoodwinMJ·
Cheers! 🍻 I’d like to take this moment to thank all the Lefties & Losers for helping make Suicide of a Nation the 2nd biggest book in Britain. Vote Reform on May 7th. Save Our Country. shorturl.at/WAWyY
Matt Goodwin tweet media
English
99
180
948
36.3K
Cat D retweetledi
Heidi Bachram
Heidi Bachram@HeidiBachram·
I wonder if Hannah Spencer is aware that the Palestinian cafe she just got ‘honoured’ in hosted a celebratory watch party when the Iranian regime bombed Tel Aviv? Green politicians are legitimising some of the WORST people. I feel a bit nauseous. @TheGreenParty
English
325
1.1K
5.6K
149.5K
Cat D retweetledi
The British Patriot
The British Patriot@TheBritLad·
🚨BREAKING: Thousands of furious Brits have taken to social media to declare a full boycott of Subway and KFC. Both chains have recently announced they are switching to Halal meat in their products. Do you support the boycott?
The British Patriot tweet mediaThe British Patriot tweet media
English
963
2.6K
9.9K
163.3K
Cat D retweetledi
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧@JChimirie66677·
The Messages Are Not Gone. They Are on Someone Else's Phone. There is a certain kind of political scandal that ends not with a dramatic revelation but with a mundane one. Not a smoking gun but a forgotten detail. Not a conspiracy unravelled but a basic error of logic, sitting in plain sight, waiting for someone to point at it. This is one of those moments. We have spent several weeks being told that Morgan McSweeney's messages are gone. Wiped. Unrecoverable. Lost to a street robbery in Pimlico and a remote deletion that, conveniently, destroyed the tracker along with everything else. Downing Street has leaned heavily on this narrative. The messages cannot be produced because the messages do not exist. The phone is gone. The evidence is gone. Move along. There is a problem with this story. WhatsApp is not a one-way street. When two people exchange messages, those messages exist on both devices. Wiping one phone does not reach through the internet and delete the other. McSweeney's conversations with Lord Mandelson are not only on McSweeney's phone. They are also on Mandelson's phone. His conversations with Jonathan Powell are on Powell's phone. His conversations with Matthew Doyle are on Doyle's phone. The messages Downing Street has declared unrecoverable are, in fact, sitting in the pockets and cloud backups of everyone McSweeney spoke to. Any child with a smartphone could tell you this. And it raises a question so obvious it is remarkable that it has taken this long to ask it loudly: why has nobody in Downing Street been asked to produce their devices? The answer, in Mandelson's case, may already be known to the Metropolitan Police. He was arrested in February on suspicion of misconduct in public office. When you arrest someone on those grounds, you seize their phone. That is standard procedure. It is not optional. If Mandelson's device was taken, as it almost certainly was, then the Metropolitan Police are already in possession of the other end of every conversation Downing Street has spent months telling us is lost. Read that again slowly. The government may have wiped one phone while the police were already holding the other. If that is the case, then the claim that McSweeney's messages are unrecoverable is not an unfortunate consequence of a street robbery. Maintaining that claim in full knowledge of Mandelson's arrest and the likely seizure of his device is not carelessness. It is something considerably more serious. Downing Street has refused to say whether any attempt was made to track the wiped phone. It has refused to explain why the ICO was not notified. It has refused to say whether MI5 or GCHQ were informed. It is now going to have to answer a fourth question, and this one is harder to manage than the others. If the police have Mandelson's phone, where are the messages? "The messages Downing Street has declared unrecoverable are, in fact, sitting in the pockets and cloud backups of everyone McSweeney spoke to."
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 tweet media
English
78
497
1.2K
16.3K
Cat D retweetledi
Higgy
Higgy@higgyboson·
This is the (cough) "man" who wants to impose a digital ID system on 70 million people for their "convenience". It's the same person who's trying to convince the World that when a phone is stolen all the data on it is lost, FOREVER. Anyone smell a rat?
Higgy tweet media
English
23
394
1.3K
6.6K
Cat D retweetledi
London4REFORM 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧
➡️REFORM-UK YOUTH POWER IS HERE! 🇬🇧🔥 ReformUK is selecting bold young teenage candidates & supporters from branches and councils across Britain for the upcoming local elections. This is the future leading the fight for real change. To British Young voters: Join the most exciting party in the UK and help turn our country around! This is what real change looks like, energetic, fearless, and ready to fix what’s broken. 👇See Below in 14 Threads - our Young & Brave Reform candidates & supporters - Let's follow them 👇 #ReformUK 👇👇👇
London4REFORM 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 tweet media
English
2
21
52
289
Cat D retweetledi
Grifty
Grifty@TheGriftReport·
🚨 PUB LANDLORD TELLS COUNCIL TO GET STUFFED: “NO WAY ON GOD’S EARTH” HE’LL PAY £260 FEE FOR ADVERTISING BOARDS ON HIS OWN PRIVATE LAND! Scott Illman, 51, boss of the Magpie and Crown in Brentford, has slammed Hounslow Council’s demand for an annual street trading licence – even though his A-boards are on private land just 6.8 metres from the road. He’s now leaning them against the pub wall in open defiance: “It’s ridiculous… I’m an antagonistic old git and they’re not coming near me!” Illman says the boards are vital to drag punters in after nearby developments hammered his footfall – yet the council never offered business rates relief. Council insists any business within 7 metres of the highway needs the licence, even on private land “accessible to the public”. Struggling pubs vs greedy councils – this one’s fighting back!
Grifty tweet mediaGrifty tweet mediaGrifty tweet media
English
79
837
4K
178.4K
Cat D retweetledi
Peter Bleksley
Peter Bleksley@PeterBleksley·
History will judge @Keir_Starmer for what he really is, a coward, on many levels.
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧@JChimirie66677

Starmer Has the Intelligence. He's Chosen to Ignore It. Why? Isaac Herzog did not mince his words. The Israeli president looked at Britain's record on Iran and asked, simply: "What is this?" Ten, twenty terror events linked to Iran on British soil in a single year. Jewish ambulances firebombed. Four men arrested surveilling Jewish targets on Tehran's behalf. Ballistic missiles fired at Diego Garcia, a base where British personnel serve. And a Prime Minister who has still not proscribed the organisation responsible for all of it. Herzog's question deserves a straight answer. Britain is the only major western ally that has not designated the IRGC as a terrorist organisation. The United States has. The European Union has — and the EU spent years resisting precisely because it feared straining relations with Tehran, before being shamed into acting by the IRGC's massacre of its own protesters. Britain has not moved. The question worth asking is not whether Starmer has the information. He does. The question is what he intends to do with it. This matters because the case against Starmer is not one of ignorance. MI5 disclosed 20 disrupted Iran-backed plots against British citizens since 2022. The Walney report documented more than 30 Iran-linked institutions operating inside Britain, eight of them already under Charity Commission investigation. The intelligence picture is not ambiguous. The threat is established, documented, and growing. What is missing is the political will to act on it. The government's stated justification for not proscribing the IRGC is a legal one: the organisation is technically part of the Iranian state and therefore cannot be treated in the same category as Hamas or Hezbollah. This argument, understood to have the fingerprints of Attorney General Lord Hermer on it, would be more persuasive if the IRGC were behaving like a state institution rather than a terror army. It directed assassination plots on British streets. It is suspected of orchestrating the firebombing of a Jewish charity. It fired missiles at British sovereign territory. The legal distinction Hermer is drawing has become a shield for inaction, not a principled limit on it. Former heads of Britain's counter-terrorism operations in the Middle East have now taken the unusual step of writing publicly to say that Starmer's refusal to proscribe the IRGC is leaving Britain strategically exposed. This is not backbench noise. These are people who spent careers inside the threat picture. When they break cover to criticise a sitting prime minister's security posture, the assessment should be taken seriously. Starmer's handling of the broader Iran conflict follows the same pattern. He initially refused to allow American strikes from British bases. He authorised their use only later, for what Downing Street carefully described as defensive operations. HMS Dragon arrived in the Mediterranean four weeks into the conflict. The sequencing is always the same: delay, recalibrate, reposition once the political cost of inaction becomes impossible to absorb. It is not caution. Caution implies a settled judgement. This is drift. The Hatzola firebombing brought 3,700 recorded antisemitic incidents in Britain last year into sharper focus. Herzog spoke to the charity's leadership from the Israeli border and told them the fate of Jews everywhere is bound together. He is right. And it falls to the British government to ensure that Iranian terror networks cannot operate on British streets with the quiet assurance that the state will not move against them. A prime minister who waits for the evidence to be overwhelming before acting has already failed. The evidence is now overwhelming. The assassins are already on our streets. "This matters because the case against Starmer is not one of ignorance. MI5 disclosed 20 disrupted Iran-backed plots against British citizens since 2022."

English
27
105
541
8.3K
Cat D retweetledi
Heidi Bachram
Heidi Bachram@HeidiBachram·
If your anti-fascist march has people holding the image of the Ayatollah who slaughtered thousands of peaceful protesters then you’re on a fascist march.
English
15
144
457
4.9K
Cat D retweetledi
Anika
Anika@anika_climate·
🚨 BREAKING NEWS!!! STATISTICAL PROOF THE MET OFFICE IS INFLATING UK MAXIMUM TEMPERATURE RECORDS, TO CREATE NET ZERO SUPPORTING CLIMATE ALARM!!! Conclusive’ statistical proof has emerged over the last year to show the UK Met Office is inflating maximum temperature readings to create Net Zero-supporting climate alarm. Over the last 30 years, the Met Office has produced the vast majority of its data from unnaturally heat-ravaged ‘junk’ sites using newly-installed accurate electronic devices able to record one minute heat spikes. The independent researcher Dr Eric Huxter has taken a year to examine the unnatural sudden rises that supply many daily ‘records’, and compared the overall spike averages with a pristine CIMO Class 1 control station. He concludes that it “could well explain the step change in rate of temperature change, and the marked increase in the step of new daily maximum records since 1990”. During his year-long project, Dr Huxter examined 340 daily maximum temperature highs recorded across 96 Met Office stations and discovered that these sites showed average short heat spikes around 1.1°C. Most of these spikes occurred around daily ‘records’ in junk CIMO Class 3, 4 and 5 locations. These sites have internationally recognised ‘uncertainties’ or possible errors of 1°C, 2°C and 5°C respectively. But spikes in temperature can occur naturally, so Huxter consulted a full year of individual minute temperature figures at a pristine Class 1 site in open farmland at Rothamsted. From the purchased records – a total of 525,541 – he was able to compile a baseline probability control. Here is the kicker – comparing the Rothamsted control with the 360 heat spikes at the largely junk sites, a chi-square test showed a highly significant difference of p <0.0001. This means that if there were truly no difference between the sites, the chances of observing such a large discrepancy in heat spikes would be less than one in 10,000 – in other words, more unlikely than one in 10,000 and quite possibly far smaller – for example, one in 100,000. Using such obviously flawed data, the Met Office’s Chief Scientist Professor Stephen Belcher calls for Net Zero to “stabilise the climate”, reporting that between 2014-2023 the number of days recording 28°C in the UK had more than doubled, while those over 30°C had tripled compared to 1961-1990. The BBC’s Chief Climate Headbanger Justin Rowlatt adds even more to the gaiety of the nation by reporting a Met Office claim that there has been a 40% increase in “pleasant days”, and these are defined as 20°C and above. “These changes may sound positive, but the UK’s shifting climate represents a dangerous upheaval for our ecosystems as well as our infrastructure”, he extrapolates. Words by Chris Morrison.
Anika tweet media
English
69
748
1.4K
18.2K
Cat D retweetledi
AmericanPapaBear™
AmericanPapaBear™@AmericaPapaBear·
🚨BREAKING: A massive crowd of people have gathered in London in support of the American left’s No Kings protest. The country that literally has a King is protesting against America who doesn’t. Can’t make this stuff up.
English
3.1K
7.3K
55.7K
1.6M