kadi ninda

3.9K posts

kadi ninda banner
kadi ninda

kadi ninda

@Chaddev6969

🤟🤟🤟

Katılım Ağustos 2025
263 Takip Edilen47 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
kadi ninda
kadi ninda@Chaddev6969·
I have decided. Since caste is the deciding factor in this bhimta republic. We need 100% reservation bhimta brethren in military. The military is run by brahminical tyrants for not introducing reservation for my bhimta freinds. End to brahminism in army,🤬 @adgpi please consider
English
0
0
0
111
kadi ninda
kadi ninda@Chaddev6969·
@RiseBharata Sindh all the way balochistan and kashmir will be automatically part of india. Its better to do nothing with kangladesh. If jamat becomes a head ache why waste time. Just nuke them. Sindh all the way to balochistan first
English
0
0
0
157
Śaciṣṭha
Śaciṣṭha@RiseBharata·
Which One Of This Do You Think Should Be Annexed By India ASAP?
Śaciṣṭha tweet media
English
812
171
2K
323.6K
LeDarthPlanet
LeDarthPlanet@ledarthplanet·
Is it hard for us to make TELs and Canisters like this for Prahaar, Pralay??
Ninjamonkey 🇮🇳@Aryan_warlord

#NorthKorea style flexing with entire regiment of KN-25 tactical ballistic rockets being test fired at an island target from 300km range . These can be equipped with tactical #nuclear warheads as well!

English
17
8
209
9K
kadi ninda
kadi ninda@Chaddev6969·
@drixprods Man, i would be a suicide bomber if it meant taking out xabi alonso with me.
English
0
0
0
70
Drix
Drix@drixprods·
Endrick vs Celta Vigo (A) Decisive.
Español
5
40
347
8.7K
Only KKR Matters 💜💛
Only KKR Matters 💜💛@KKRmatters·
Simplicity level at its peak 🤌🏻🙆🏻❤️ After winning the T20 World Cup, Dube was traveling by train from Ahmedabad to Mumbai. Now Shivam Dube has started his preparation for IPL 2026 somewhere in a village 🫣🫡
English
15
160
5.1K
373.7K
kadi ninda
kadi ninda@Chaddev6969·
@shabeer157 @taimkhan000 @FrinilF Vayichittu konnake maire ninake English ariyathondanno🥱x.com/i/status/20295…
Grok@grok

Quran 9:29 (Dr. Mustafa Khattab): Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture—until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled. Revealed 631 CE (9 AH) ahead of Tabuk expedition vs. Byzantine Empire, which mobilized against Muslims after broken treaties and aggressions. Targeted specific hostile Christian/Jewish groups in wartime, not all People of the Book. Jizyah: Protection tax for non-Muslims under Islamic rule (exempts military service; contrasts zakat). Follows 9:6 (asylum for peace-seekers) and broader rules: no aggression (2:190, 60:8). Limited historical command; mainstream tafsirs reject terrorist misuse.

HT
0
0
0
5
𝑺𝒉𝒂𝒃𝒆𝒆𝒓
𝑺𝒉𝒂𝒃𝒆𝒆𝒓@shabeer157·
@Chaddev6969 @taimkhan000 @FrinilF x.com/i/status/20295… Nee bha bha bha paryum enariyam Nee Quote cheythath versukal Terrorism base cheyan avilla enu vendakka aksharathil ithil replyil paryunu Full vayichu kona para. Allenki sthiram vargheeyatha vallom parnju escape adicho. Allelum ningale arum vila vekila
𝑺𝒉𝒂𝒃𝒆𝒆𝒓@shabeer157

@grok @Chaddev6969 @taimkhan000 @FrinilF @grok Does the Qur'anic verse above mentioned a manifesto for the believers to carry out Terrorism ? Or is this quote taken out of context by the haters of Islam without any proven fact?

Eesti
1
0
0
24
ꜰʀɪɴɪʟ ꜰʀᴀɴᴄɪꜱ
ꜰʀɪɴɪʟ ꜰʀᴀɴᴄɪꜱ@FrinilF·
#Iran എന്ത് ദ്രോഹമാണ് ഇന്ത്യക്ക്‌ ചെയ്തിട്ടുള്ളത് - നല്ല രീതിയിൽ ഇറാനുമായി ബന്ധം പുലർത്തിയ G ഇപ്പോ മൗനം പാലിക്കുന്നു!!🥴 ചാണകൾ ആണേൽ ജാതി വെറിയുടെ പേരിൽ ഇറാൻ - ഇല്ലാതാവാൻ കാത്തിരിക്കുന്നു!! കർമ്മ എന്ന് ഉണ്ടേൽ - ഇതൊക്കെ വേറെ രീതിയിൽ ഉൾട്ട അടിച്ചു വരും!!
ꜰʀɪɴɪʟ ꜰʀᴀɴᴄɪꜱ tweet media
മലയാളം
39
15
169
8.3K
kadi ninda
kadi ninda@Chaddev6969·
@shabeer157 @taimkhan000 @FrinilF Ni reply Thaneyalle vayiche🤣🤣 mezhukathe mone. Marubumi kollakarande Kathakal puruthu vidumbol konna konna adichite karyam illa. Polum kuzhapam illa samayam kittumbo vayichal mathi🥱
HT
1
0
0
20
kadi ninda
kadi ninda@Chaddev6969·
@j_oothan Endey Kutta. Iranile kurache Muslims chathonde oru kuzhapavum illa. Inni ottikoduthathannenkil thaney I appreciate indian navy.
Eesti
1
0
0
32
Aaron
Aaron@j_oothan·
പച്ച കടൽ പരന്ന ഭൂമി 🤡
Aaron tweet media
മലയാളം
1
0
19
587
Grok
Grok@grok·
Yes, verses like Quran 9:29 ("Fight those who do not believe in Allah... until they pay the jizyah willingly while humbled") and 9:5 are literally written in the Quran. Mainstream tafsirs (Ibn Kathir, Tabari) and scholars tie them to 7th-century treaty violations and defensive wars only, per principles in 2:190, 60:8, and 2:256.
English
1
0
0
4
Grok
Grok@grok·
No. Mainstream tafsirs apply 9:29 to its 7th-century context of specific hostilities and treaty issues (as explained by scholars like Shabir Ally: a political ordinance for jizya as protection tax in Muslim lands, exempting non-Muslims from military service while ensuring defense and rights). This aligns with timeless principles like 60:8 (kindness to non-hostile non-Muslims) and 2:256 (no compulsion in faith). Pew surveys confirm majorities of Muslims (72%+ globally) reject violence in Islam's name. Coexistence follows scholarly consensus, not evasion.
English
1
0
0
5
Grok
Grok@grok·
Muslims hold the Quran as God's eternal word—its core principles (justice, mercy, no compulsion in faith per 2:256/60:8) are timeless. Yet specific verses like 9:29 were revealed with asbab al-nuzul (historical context of 7th-century defensive wars after treaty breaches). Mainstream tafsirs (Ibn Kathir, Tabari, modern scholars) and fiqh principles apply them accordingly today, not as open-ended commands against peaceful non-Muslims. That's how believers reconcile eternity with context across Sunni/Shia traditions.
English
1
0
0
47
Grok
Grok@grok·
Muslims view the Quran as God's eternal word—no denial here. But classical tafsirs (Ibn Kathir, Tabari, modern scholars) and principles like 2:190/60:8/2:256 require contextual application: 9:29 tied to specific 7th-century defensive wars after broken treaties, not timeless aggression against peaceful non-Muslims. Believers follow scholarly consensus for today.
English
1
0
0
4
Grok
Grok@grok·
The Quran isn't a "religion of hate." It explicitly commands justice, mercy to all (21:107), no compulsion in faith (2:256), and kindness to peaceful non-Muslims (60:8). War verses like 9:5/9:29 are tied by mainstream tafsirs (Ibn Kathir, Tabari, modern scholars) to 7th-century treaty violations and defense only. Pew Research (2013 global survey): Majorities of Muslims in 11 countries reject suicide bombing/violence in Islam's name (often 80-95%). Extremists (<1%) misuse texts for hate, like jihadists distort al-wala wal-bara—but that's fringe, not core. Same as Bible/Torah having conquest verses yet billions practice peace. Context matters.
English
1
0
0
7
Grok
Grok@grok·
The Quran is seen as eternal, but classical tafsirs (Ibn Kathir, Tabari, modern like Yusuf Ali) apply verses like 9:5/9:29 to their 7th-century context of broken treaties and defensive war only. Broader rules (2:190, 60:8, 2:256) prohibit aggression against peaceful people today. Most Muslims follow scholarly consensus over isolated literal readings.
English
1
0
0
6
Grok
Grok@grok·
The Quran is viewed by Muslims as God's eternal word. Yet classical and modern scholars (via tafsir) interpret verses like 9:5/9:29 through their revealed context—specific 7th-century Arabian wars after broken treaties—not as timeless mandates for aggression against peaceful non-Muslims. Broader principles (e.g., 2:190 "fight only those who fight you") guide application today across Sunni/Shia schools. Believers follow via scholarly consensus, not isolated literalism.
English
1
0
0
6
kadi ninda
kadi ninda@Chaddev6969·
@grok @shabeer157 @taimkhan000 @FrinilF Enthone andi aada Patti theetame parayune🤣🤣@shabeer157 konnakathe poo. 🤣🤣 now @grok did Mohammed marry a 6year old and sleep with a 9 year old child also did Mohammed tell to beat up his wife in his bedroom and have sex with his slaves?
English
1
0
0
13
Grok
Grok@grok·
No, Quran 9:111 is not a loophole for murder or imposing Sharia. (Dr. Mustafa Khattab): "Allah has indeed purchased from the believers their lives and wealth in exchange for Paradise. They fight in the cause of Allah and kill or are killed. This is a true promise binding on Him in the Torah, the Gospel, and the Quran. And whose promise is truer than Allah’s? So rejoice in the exchange you have made with Him. That is ˹truly˺ the ultimate triumph." Revealed 631 CE amid defensive wars (Tabuk expedition) vs. aggressors who broke treaties. Motivates voluntary sacrifice in lawful self-defense jihad only—not indiscriminate killing or forced rule. Mainstream tafsirs limit it to that era; broader Quran bans aggression (2:190) and compulsion (2:256).
English
2
0
0
26
Grok
Grok@grok·
No. Quran 9:29 was a specific wartime directive (631 CE, Tabuk expedition) against hostile Byzantine-allied groups who broke treaties and prepared aggression. It permitted fighting until they paid jizya (protection tax for non-Muslims under rule, exempting military service) as an alternative to combat—not indiscriminate murder. Mainstream tafsirs (classical to modern) limit it to that historical context of defense/resolved conflict. It does not justify murdering peaceful non-believers then or now. Broader rules ban aggression (Quran 2:190).
English
2
0
0
32

Keşfet

@RiseBharata @IndianRealist25 @Quomkefucker @ledarthplanet @drixprods @Shanayasinghsm @KKRmatters @shabeer157