The ChatGPT Report

No new episode but a new Substack post if interested open.substack.com/pub/ryanoilrig…

@AOC I’m asking every ai company to buy me, I’m a full sell out

Politicians - especially Dems - should pledge not to take AI money. They are buying up influence ahead of the midterms, and Dems who take AI $ will lose authority and trust as the public bears the cost. Their money will end up being toxic anyway. People are catching on.

@_jaydeepkarale Loser status

Another day of AI CEOs saying horrible things

@kylegawley It’s the damn truth, like anytime I see a demo it never lives up to the hype

why is everyone lying about how good AI is?

@AdobeFirefly @Mr_AllenT No one’s talking to you

Hey Sora fans: You can generate video in Firefly. 🙂

I’m starting to think Ai isn’t as powerful as people say it is

Sora is dead....but for real, its dead How did OpenAI allow this to happen and how the heck do you smuggle $2.5B worth of chips into China? All the AI news in less than 15 minutes open.spotify.com/episode/3m9g6g…

I’m here for it honestly

@soraofficialapp @dustinhollywood Wow that’s actually kinda crazy

We’re saying goodbye to the Sora app. To everyone who created with Sora, shared it, and built community around it: thank you. What you made with Sora mattered, and we know this news is disappointing. We’ll share more soon, including timelines for the app and API and details on preserving your work. – The Sora Team

Honestly kinda suprised wow!

@CultureCrave Wow that’s actually massive

OpenAI is shutting down its AI video platform Sora after it flopped Disney is now exiting their $1B deal with OpenAI

@claudeai Wild if true… because we all know how great demos are

You can now enable Claude to use your computer to complete tasks. It opens your apps, navigates your browser, fills in spreadsheets—anything you'd do sitting at your desk. Research preview in Claude Cowork and Claude Code, macOS only.

@MaMoMVPY Agreed, he’s been AI TOO MUCH

A year ago Jensen was a completely reasonable sounding CEO. Now he and the rest of the AI CEOs are just making up obvious fantasies about the state of AI. We have not achieved AGI. He knows that we are nowhere near that.

@cryptorand Exact thought

@ChatGPTReport Lets see if he shares some benchmarks or demos

💥JUST IN: NVIDIA CEO announces “We’ve achieved AGI”

@Cointelegraph Suuuure

🚨 BIG: NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang says “we’ve achieved AGI.”

@unusual_whales Yeeeeaahhhhh I don’t believe it

@verge Yeah I don’t believe it

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang says ‘I think we’ve achieved AGI’ theverge.com/ai-artificial-…

@unusual_whales Fraud, one thing I learned working in finance for even one year was “nothing is guaranteed”

OpenAl is offering private-equity firms a guaranteed minimum return of 17.5%, as well as early access to models not yet in public release, per Reuters

@pmitu It really did

AI killed LinkedIn.

@HedgieMarkets Not liking the direction of this one

🦔 Google is testing AI-generated replacements for headlines and website titles in search results. The Verge noticed their headlines were being rewritten without their input. One example: "I used the 'cheat on everything' AI tool and it didn't help me cheat on anything" became "Cheat on everything AI tool." Google says the goal is to better match titles to user queries and facilitate engagement. They claim if this rolls out widely it won't use generative AI, though they didn't explain what other kind of AI would be rewriting headlines. Google Discover already does this and apparently it "performs well for user satisfaction." My Take Google is now rewriting other people's work and putting it in front of users as if that's what the publisher wrote. The headline is part of the article. It's an editorial choice that conveys tone, angle, and intent. When Google changes "Microsoft is rebranding Copilot in the most Microsoft way possible" to "Copilot Changes: Marketing Teams at it Again," they're not clarifying anything, they're replacing the author's voice with generic slop. The legal question here is interesting. Google has traditionally claimed protection as a platform that indexes and displays content rather than creating it. Once you start rewriting headlines, you're arguably developing content, which gets into Section 230 territory. Publishers whose work gets misrepresented might have defamation claims if an AI-rewritten headline changes the meaning of their article. Google is already driving less traffic to publishers and now they want to edit what little representation those publishers have left in search results. This feels like another step toward a web where Google just tells you what it thinks you should know instead of connecting you to sources. Hedgie🤗