Ram Chhapolia

8.1K posts

Ram Chhapolia

Ram Chhapolia

@ChhapoliaRam

Businessman By Profession, Nation Lover By Heart !

Cuttack Katılım Ekim 2013
820 Takip Edilen260 Takipçiler
Ram Chhapolia retweetledi
Aaraadhya Saxena 🇮🇳
Aaraadhya Saxena 🇮🇳@ihailmyindia·
Arpit Sharma's father Vikas Sharma contested UP Assembly Election from Aam Aadmi Party. Vikas Sharma lost his deposit & got only 1400 votes... "Unfollow BJP" 💅
Aaraadhya Saxena 🇮🇳 tweet media
Arpit Sharma@iArpitSpeaks

Unfollow BJP from all social media handles. Convince your parents, show them what BJP is doing with the future of India & make them Unfollow BJP. Make videos & tag me, CJP Insta handles, Abhijit, Dhruv, etc. We shall UNITE for our Democracy 🇮🇳

English
87
1.5K
5.1K
85.7K
Ram Chhapolia retweetledi
The Frustrated Indian
The Frustrated Indian@FrustIndian·
Guys they want blood ! Your views ?
The Frustrated Indian tweet media
English
11
19
83
1.7K
Ram Chhapolia retweetledi
Ankur Singh
Ankur Singh@AnkurSingh·
Want to see Credibility of Cockroach Party? It's founder called the Screenshot Fake and Edited. But the person himself is saying the post was real and is apologising after public tagged Police.
Ankur Singh tweet mediaAnkur Singh tweet media
English
21
351
866
22.1K
Ram Chhapolia retweetledi
Karthik Reddy
Karthik Reddy@bykarthikreddy·
You won't believe, because no media talks about this. The promise was 2 crore jobs a year, but India added 17 crore jobs in 6 years. More than what PM Modi Govt promised.
Karthik Reddy tweet media
English
25
314
872
13.9K
Ram Chhapolia retweetledi
Rohit
Rohit@Iam_Rohit_G·
Year 2020, BJP : Sourav you should Join BJP Sourav Ganguly : Declined BJP : Become BCCI President Sourav Ganguly : Ok. BJP : Become CAB President Saurav Ganguly: Ok BJP : Speak on TMC Violence Sourav Ganguly : Declined BJP : Speak on TMC's Corruption Sourav Ganguly : Declined BJP : Speak on TMCs Muslim Appeasement Sourav Ganguly : Declined 2025 : BJP : You should join BJP and Let's Remove Mamta Banerjee Sourav Ganguly : Declined 2026 : BJP Wins Bengal : Saurav Ganguly Facilitating Dilip Ghosh!! The most Selfish, Opportunist Person I have ever seen!!
English
229
934
2.9K
111.6K
Ram Chhapolia retweetledi
AjiHaan
AjiHaan@AjiHaaan·
कॉकरोचों की आदत होती है कि जहाँ गंदगी दिखी वहीं पाये जाते हैं 😄
AjiHaan tweet media
हिन्दी
25
129
963
6.3K
Ram Chhapolia
Ram Chhapolia@ChhapoliaRam·
@iArpitSpeaks Laude aa mat jana India warna itna koote jaoge na, dallo ka desh nahi hai ye, saale tum jaise dallo ne hii ye desh ko ICU pahucha diya tha.
हिन्दी
0
0
0
4
Arpit Sharma
Arpit Sharma@iArpitSpeaks·
Unfollow BJP from all social media handles. Convince your parents, show them what BJP is doing with the future of India & make them Unfollow BJP. Make videos & tag me, CJP Insta handles, Abhijit, Dhruv, etc. We shall UNITE for our Democracy 🇮🇳
English
5.7K
4.7K
22.7K
1M
Ram Chhapolia retweetledi
Mudit Jain
Mudit Jain@MuditJain_IN·
They are not even hiding their agenda.
Mudit Jain tweet media
English
258
3.1K
11.7K
161.8K
Ram Chhapolia retweetledi
Gems
Gems@gemsofbabus_·
Why only BJP? If this movement is truly neutral, then no party should get protection. BJP must be questioned. But so should Congress, AAP, TMC, DMK, JMM and every other party ruling any state. > Paper leaks don’t happen in one party’s state. > Crime against women doesn’t happen in one party’s state. > Corruption, freebies, unemployment, failed schools, broken hospitals and police failure are not owned by one party. So the rule should be simple: >Question BJP where BJP rules. >Question AAP where AAP rules. >Question Congress where Congress rules. >Question every party where they fail the people. If you target only one party, that is not neutrality. That is Selective Politics. A real youth movement must not become anyone’s IT cell. No party is clean. No leader is above questions. No government deserves blind support.
Gems tweet mediaGems tweet media
English
99
477
3K
58.3K
Ram Chhapolia retweetledi
Smita Deshmukh🇮🇳
Smita Deshmukh🇮🇳@smitadeshmukh·
The explosive rise of the Cockroach Janta Party crossing 10 million followers on Instagram is being treated like a monumental political shift, but it really just exposes how shallow digital metrics actually are. Amassing a massive audience on that platform does not require a thoroughly researched, intellectually sound ideology; it just requires a highly shareable gimmick that aligns with the algorithm. Just look at the baseline numbers of its most popular creators. Puneet Superstar commands over 14 million followers by screaming into cameras and rolling in mud, while Rakhi Sawant boasts over 14 million followers for orchestrating constant public drama. Urfi Javed sits at over 5 million followers for creating DIY outfits out of random household items... the list is long. It is proof that a generation of chronically online scrollers loves a viral meme. Instagram is a dopamine engine and stop mistaking algorithmic popularity for genuine intellectual influence.
Smita Deshmukh🇮🇳 tweet media
English
62
141
615
79.4K
🪷 Yogmaya Astrology ✨
🪷 Yogmaya Astrology ✨@YogmayaAstro5·
The Shukla Pratipada Chart for this year made it evident that this year we will see student protests and radicalisation of educational institutions. The ground is being laid for such unrest. The youth is going to be targeted as they have started for 2029.
English
4
16
233
7.5K
Kshitij More
Kshitij More@Areyyaaaaaaaar·
@YogmayaAstro5 Obviously what has the govt done for the youth? People with 2 to 3 degrees are sitting unemployed watching reels. This is the future which the current regime wanted now they will get it's fruits!
English
2
0
0
271
Ram Chhapolia retweetledi
शून्य
शून्य@0__Shunya__0·
Packaging नई है पर माल वही पुराना है। गोलमाल है भाई सब गोलमाल है
शून्य tweet media
हिन्दी
156
1.9K
6.9K
61.6K
Ram Chhapolia retweetledi
S.Jayashankar
S.Jayashankar@jaypanicker·
PM is traveling abroad to secure investments and ensure energy security in this period of economic gloom due to various global wars. It is one thing to know that, as a contender of PM post over the last 16 years, you don't have the intellectual capacity to understand this. However, I am intrigued to see your irritation towards promoting a reputed Indian brand (Parle). Is it because you don't want Indian brands to be showcased on the global stage? Or are you disgruntled by your intelligence (or lack of it), which has kept you puzzled over why melody is chocolaty?
Rahul Gandhi@RahulGandhi

मोदी जी, आपका Melody Reel हर भारतीय का - और उसके दर्द का - अपमान है।

English
2.7K
6.9K
31K
1.3M
Ram Chhapolia retweetledi
Prof. Krishnamurthy V Subramanian
Did you know that the U.S. defaulted on its sovereign obligations in 1971 when it unilaterally reneged on dollar-gold convertibility. Russia defaulted in 1998 and 2022. Argentina: 9 times since independence. Pakistan: required IMF bailouts 23 times. Greece defaulted in 2012. And India? Zero defaults. Not even in 1991! Yet Western investors classify India as "emerging risk" and call U.S. Treasuries the "risk-free rate." This isn't risk analysis. This is cognitive bias a la Daniel Kahneman's book "Thinking, Fast and Slow". Humans systematically overweight culturally proximate information while underweighting statistical patterns that don't fit our mental models. Western strategic planners trust Western partners not because the data supports it, but because the cultural markers feel familiar. Three facts that challenge everything about how we assess partnership risk: FACT 1: Across 5,000 years of recorded history, India has rarely waged wars of territorial conquest. Not in 3000 BCE when the Indus Valley Civilization had technological superiority. Not in 1000 CE when Indian mathematics and metallurgy exceeded Europe by centuries. Not in 2026 when it possesses nuclear weapons and the world's 4th-largest military. Not in 2047 when it projects to be a top-two economy. Compare: China (annexed Tibet 1950, 14 territorial disputes, South China Sea expansion). Russia (Georgia 2008, Crimea 2014, Ukraine 2022). Europe (500 years of colonial conquest across three continents). U.S. (military interventions in 20+ countries since 1945). This pattern is observable strategic behavior anchored in the Arthashastra, Kautilya's 2,300-year-old treatise arguing that short-term territorial expansion undermines the systemic conditions for sustained prosperity. The concept of "mandala" (circle of states) recognizes that each power's long-term interest depends on system equilibrium. FACT 2: India has never defaulted on debt, treaties, or security guarantees since independence in 1947. The most revealing test: 1991 balance of payments crisis. Reserves fell to $1.2 billion = just three weeks of imports. Default appeared certain. Instead, India implemented painful reforms, honored every obligation. India didn't use political costs as an excuse to default. Commitments were kept. This behavior isn't accidental. It's anchored in the Sanskrit concept of ṛṇānubandhaḥ, that obligations are metaphysically binding across time. The Mahabharata established 2,000 years ago that rulers who break commitments violate cosmic order and create systemic instability. Philosophy became institutional architecture: investment-grade credit through multiple crises, $600B forex reserves (6th globally), zero defaults on government securities across 77 years. FACT 3: During COVID-19, India exported 300 million vaccine doses to 110 countries while its own vaccination was incomplete. 96 countries received doses free through "Vaccine Maitri." Meanwhile: U.S. ordered 1.2 billion doses for 330 million people (4x population). EU ordered 4.6 billion for 450 million (10x population). Canada ordered 400 million for 38 million people (10x population). Western nations didn't begin international distribution until domestic targets were substantially met. The distinction? India's Economic Survey 2020-21 quoted Sanskrit: "āpadā hi prāṇa rakṣā hi dharmasya prathama aṅkuraḥ" (in calamity, protecting life is the first duty). Not Indian life. Life in general. This aligns with Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam (the world as one family), not as rhetoric but as policy. India supplies 60% of global vaccines and 20% of generic medicines normally, maintained production during its own constraints, built digital public infrastructure (UPI processes more transactions than all nations combined) and offers it open-source to developing countries. WHY THIS MATTERS NOW: Every CFO, sovereign wealth fund, and policymaker is asking: "Who can we depend on for the next 50 years?" Ukraine shattered the illusion that economic integration prevents aggression. COVID exposed single-source dependencies. Taiwan reveals semiconductor concentration risk. The global economy is re-optimizing from efficiency to trust. But here's where Kahneman's research becomes critical: most strategic planners are making decisions using "System 1" thinking (fast, intuitive, pattern-matching based on cultural familiarity) rather than "System 2" thinking (slow, analytical, data-driven assessment of long-horizon behavioral patterns). The result? Systematic mispricing of partnership risk. Strategic planners face a choice: - China: manufacturing efficiency + demonstrated willingness to weaponize interdependence (sanctions on South Korea over THAAD, Australia over COVID inquiry, Lithuania over Taiwan, Belt & Road debt traps in 60+ countries) - Russia: resource access + repeated weaponization (invaded Ukraine despite economic integration, cut gas to freeze European cities) - U.S.: innovation + extraterritorial enforcement (billions in fines on European banks for transactions legal in Europe, CLOUD Act overrides local privacy laws, "America First" tariffs hit Canada, Mexico, EU alongside rivals) - India: 5,000-year track record of territorial restraint + zero defaults + systemic thinking during crises + challenges (infrastructure gaps, bureaucratic complexity, uneven state capacity). The question isn't perfection. It is: which risk profile aligns with 50-year partnership objectives when analyzed through System 2 rather than System 1 thinking? THE UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTH: If India's pattern suggests lower long-duration risk, why is trust in India still "emerging"? Kahneman would predict exactly this outcome. Three cognitive biases at work: 1. **Availability bias:** We assess risk based on vivid, recent, culturally proximate information. NATO expansion incorporated Poland, Czech Republic, Hungary rapidly because they registered as "European." India's democracy, rule of law, English-language business environment gets discounted because cultural markers differ. 2. **Confirmation bias:** Western institutions have decades of frameworks built around current partnerships. New data contradicting established models gets filtered out rather than integrated. 3. **Status quo bias:** Existing relationships are comfortable. The U.S.-Europe alliance, U.S.-Japan partnership, Five Eyes intelligence sharing operate with established protocols. Structural change requires crisis-level disruption to overcome inertia. The crisis arrived. For boards evaluating long-term partnerships—semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, digital infrastructure, maritime security, critical minerals—India presents a risk profile worth systematic, System 2 analysis. Because of demonstrated behavior across sufficient time horizons to be statistically meaningful. In an era of fragmentation, weaponized interdependence, and trust deficits, historical patterns become predictive indicators. Kahneman spent decades showing that intuitive judgments systematically diverge from statistical reality. Strategic partnership assessment is no exception. The question is: Are we assessing risk based on data, or based on what feels familiar? In the 21st century, power matters. But trust may matter more. And trust should be measured by track record, not by cultural proximity.
English
59
497
1.1K
84.2K
Ram Chhapolia retweetledi
Rahul Gupta
Rahul Gupta@R_astro_market·
Video of Jiah Khan (allegedly 16-year-old in the video) with Mahesh Bhatt, posted by her sister. Same Mahesh Bhatt whom Alia keeps on promoting as ideal human. Horror is these same Bollywood gatekeepers who hide exploitation of newcomer females by their families/friend circle are promoted as feminist icons in pop culture.
English
230
2.7K
9.7K
1.8M