Chibo

@DreamMixGames plans for over/under bridges for figure 8 tracks and other crossroads?

why is this 'Kart Maker' game surprisingly cozy? you build tracks while you drive 👉play it on steam: store.steampowered.com/app/4020010/My…

@Irrlichterl @docm77 @purplehuman48 Anyone heard of the whimzical band, Elsa In Chains?

Another Frostbite the Wicked sitting in the ice cave and, as @purplehuman48 suggested, in chains. @docm77 #docm77fanart #hermitcraftfanart

The video keeps getting deleted everywhere it's posted online. Keep sharing it.

@homeless_law Providing them with decent housing would be a helluva lot cheaper than jail, but cruelty has always been the point. And we must nourish the prison-industrial complex, as it is our only growth industry in this decaying empire.

Imagine if we spent $400 million dollars between 2015-2020 building up a third party and how strong that party would be today? These PMC leftists just love wasting time and resources. They do it because they make a ton of money running these Democratic Party failed campaigns. It’s infuriating

Y’all let these folks convince y’all burning down businesses is violence, but those same businesses and corporations that literally poison the air you breathe and the water you drink, is just the cost of business. Y’all have been convinced your lives are worth less than buildings

@briebriejoy The Idea is to keep you chasing fake dreams while the wealthy manipulate the system to be even richer. The top 10% of the US population dominate the economy while the rest slave away. We keep falling for the "Billionaires Trap"...

Benny Johnson gets ads for fun gay cruises, I get whatever this is

This... #DucknCover x.com/i/status/20419…

@Abdullah_Om3r03 .

I’m Muslim Palestinian 🇵🇸 Zionists on X nuked my account. They want me removed and killed. If you see this, please repost or reply a dot.

JUST IN: Meta sold 7 million Ray-Ban smart glasses in 2025 alone. Workers in Kenya are watching the footage. Not metadata. Not anonymized clips. The actual videos. People undressing. People in bathrooms. People having sex. Bank cards. Medical documents. The blurring is supposed to protect privacy. It fails constantly. The contractors see everything. Here is the part that should stop you cold: You did not buy the glasses. You did not agree to the terms of service. You did not consent to anything. But if someone wearing Meta glasses walks into your bedroom, your bathroom, your doctor's office, your home, a contractor on the other side of the world may be watching you right now. The person wearing the glasses consented. Everyone else in the room did not. Meta's defense is that this is all disclosed in the privacy policy. They are technically correct. Buried in language so dense that 99% of users never read it. And even if they did, it would not matter, because the terms govern the wearer's data. Not yours. You are not a party to the contract. You are the product being annotated. Millions of AI-enabled cameras walking around in public. Recording constantly. Uploading to servers. Reviewed by humans earning a few dollars an hour to label your most intimate moments so the algorithm gets smarter. This is not a bug. This is the business model. The EU is already asking questions. MEPs submitted formal inquiries to the Commission this week demanding answers on GDPR compliance. The problem is obvious: European data protection law requires consent from data subjects. Bystanders are data subjects. Bystanders never consented. The entire architecture violates the regulation by design. Meta's response has been silence and a reference to terms of service that do not apply to the people actually being filmed. Google Glass died because people called the wearers "Glassholes" and banned them from bars. Meta solved the social problem by making the glasses look normal. They did not solve the privacy problem. They hid it. Seven million units sold in 2025. The installed base is accelerating. Every unit is a potential surveillance node operated by someone who may not understand what they are feeding into the system and reviewed by contractors who see everything the algorithm cannot process. The question is not whether this becomes a scandal. The question is whether the scandal arrives before or after the glasses are on 50 million faces. Watch the EU. If Brussels moves on GDPR enforcement, Meta faces a choice: disable human review in Europe and cripple the AI training pipeline, or accept fines that could reach billions. Neither outcome is priced into the stock. The glasses are selling faster than ever. The contractors keep watching. And somewhere right now, someone you have never met is looking at footage of you that you never knew existed.

The argument structure is always the same. Leaded petrol: we need it for engine performance. Removing it would increase costs and damage the car industry. We removed it. Engines still work. Blood lead levels dropped. Childhood IQ scores rose. DDT: we need it for crop protection. Removing it would devastate agriculture. We removed it. Agriculture continued. Bald eagle populations recovered. Breast milk became cleaner. Asbestos: we need it for fire resistance and insulation. Removing it would compromise building safety. We removed it. Buildings remain standing. Mesothelioma rates began to decline. CFCs: we need them for refrigeration. Alternatives don't work as well. We removed them. Refrigeration continues. The ozone layer is recovering. Glyphosate: we need it to feed the world. Removing it would cause famine. The script is identical. The industry interest is identical. The outcome, each time we've removed the "essential" chemical, has also been identical. We managed. We always manage. The chemical was never as essential as the company selling it said.

Notice how we can convert empty warehouses into concentration camps, but we can’t turn it into housing for the homeless.

@IrisErased @realLandsEnd This is not what is intended to be sold here. It seems only as a critique of the way of thinking being displayed. You are correct that in the meantime nothing is being done effectively. For anything to start we have to each carefully realize the flaws in our ways of thinking.

@realLandsEnd I don't disagree but how do you sell people on this? How do you convince people that someone acting volatile will not snap and potentially hurt them? And while the long-term solutions are largely giving people homes and safety and support what should be done in the intermediate?

Posts like this are a painful but useful case study in what we disability scholars call “carceral sanism” which is a kind of maximalist fusion of “mental health stigma” with punitive social logics. It frames visible crisis as a breach of public order, not evidence of abandonment

just one more right wing policy bro. just gotta hurt a few more minorities bro. life will be awesome then I swear. trust me. bro.

Historians will conclude that Americans said “Let’s just burn the whole thing down” because they lacked the freedom, stability, and prosperity they were promised their entire lives because political corruption hollowed out the country.

Capitalism screws workers by design