Nate

3.1K posts

Nate banner
Nate

Nate

@ChivalrousCHAD

Rich, famous, handsome, and humble. 6’3 btw

Los Angeles Katılım Şubat 2013
281 Takip Edilen304 Takipçiler
Nate retweetledi
Roman Helmet Guy
Roman Helmet Guy@romanhelmetguy·
Millennial political manifestos are just like “Hey! So uh, I did a thing.”
English
60
238
5.9K
87.3K
Immortan Joe Mazzulla
Immortan Joe Mazzulla@normal_jake_·
I always defer to the real baseball heads when it comes to the strategy side but you really don’t to be a baseball expert to see how the Red Sox are a circus act Everything just gets insanely messy with them.
English
8
1
31
1.1K
James Lindsay, anti-Communist
James Lindsay, anti-Communist@ConceptualJames·
I find this mind-boggling, to be honest, and I'm not arguing that Christians should be pacifists or whatever. The example Wilson gives here about selling your cloak to buy a sword comes from the Gospel of Luke. I'm an agnostic and even know this story. He exegetes it wrong. In fact, he exegetes it completely wrong. The point of the story in Luke is that Jesus knows he's about to be taken by the Romans, so he instructs his disciples to get armed, even telling them to sell their cloaks to buy a sword if they must. The point is not to fight, though, as Wilson uses it to mean. The point is completely otherwise. Jesus actually makes this clear IN THE NEXT SENTENCE, BEFORE HE'S EVEN DONE SPEAKING to his disciples. He is doing it so that when he is taken he will fulfill the prophecy in Isaiah about the Messiah being "numbered among the transgressors." The context is that Romans would see an armed band as transgressors and thus take Jesus into custody upon those terms. When Jesus' disciples say they already have two swords, Jesus replies "it is enough." Enough for what? Fighting off Romans who are there to keep the law? No way. For looking like an armed band of transgressors, which would fulfill the prophecy in Isaiah? Yes. But it's not just speculation. The swords are explicitly NOT for fighting back. When Peter draws his sword in the forthcoming scene and slices the ear off a Roman in Gethsemane (where I have stood), Jesus rebukes him for it, saying whoever takes up the sword will die by it. That's one of the MOST FAMOUS STORIES IN THE WHOLE GOSPEL. His disciples weren't armed to fight back. Fighting back wasn't part of the equation. It's bewildering to me that Wilson would use this particular example to make his point. It reminds me of the time I mixed up the point of the story about the wheat and the tares because I wasn't actually all that familiar with the story but knew of it vaguely. Romans 13 (Paul, not Jesus) makes a better case for the authorities being invested with the authority to use force to maintain safety and order. Even the apt example of Jesus chasing moneychangers out of the Temple with a whip makes the case, but this other thing is simply mind-boggling to see. Even I know better.
TRIGGERnometry@triggerpod

“Christianity was never a ‘be passive and get walked over’ religion.” Andrew Wilson @paleochristcon pushes back on the idea that Christianity is a pacifist religion. Forgive your enemies, yes, but that doesn’t mean allowing harm to continue. He points to Jesus forgiving on the cross, yet also cleansing the temple and speaking about the sword. What do you think? Where did the idea that Christianity = passivity actually come from?

English
243
68
792
143.3K
Warner Elliott
Warner Elliott@warnerelliott60·
@_LiveLoveSimply @CurtisDaly_ We were making peanuts 30 years ago; it's all relative. It certainly wasn't their middle-class starter home. I bought a 3-bedroom starter home for 15k in 1979, but I was only making $3 an hour.
English
4
0
3
333
Curtis Daly
Curtis Daly@CurtisDaly_·
We were raised to be adults in a world that no longer exists
English
206
957
8.2K
309.1K
Nate
Nate@ChivalrousCHAD·
@highlandgirl24 Yeah I think the average age gap is what, 3 years? Most guys cope and think they’ll be multi millionaires by 35 pulling whoever they want. Coping
English
1
0
0
25
Nate
Nate@ChivalrousCHAD·
@highlandgirl24 I think it’s true that men and women peak in “value” (for lack of a better term) at different ages. I know a lot of girls who are dating guys 5+ years older than them
English
1
0
0
26
Nate retweetledi
Immortan Joe Mazzulla
Immortan Joe Mazzulla@normal_jake_·
I think John Henry should be arrested
English
2
5
65
1.8K
Starkian Hypothesis
Starkian Hypothesis@Starkian7789·
Latinos are chill and not particularly power hungry but they tend to vote for the most charismatic politicians which enables corruption. Ironically this also applies to Trump winning over more Latinos.
ishaan@Camus_reawake

@Starkian7789 Latinos are too chill to care about any of this.

English
2
3
24
550
Nate
Nate@ChivalrousCHAD·
@growing_daniel Really dumb of him to show his cards this early
English
0
0
8
3K
Matt Walsh
Matt Walsh@MattWalshBlog·
If we’re going to have a conservative civil war, the dividing line should be those who believe in protecting and preserving marriage, the family, and unborn life vs those indifferent or opposed. You can’t be a conservative in any meaningful sense if you don’t want to conserve the bedrock of civilization itself.
English
2K
1K
16.8K
1.5M
Yes it's me
Yes it's me@Isitreallymeno·
@sultan_exists Imagine doing all that bullshit just to get mogged by this chad
Yes it's me tweet media
English
9
3
858
34.3K
Destiny | Steven Bonnell II
Destiny | Steven Bonnell II@TheOmniLiberal·
One of the most pathetic things that I see all of these fake centrist, right-wing podcasters do is just present the most ludicrous strawmans of a person to beat up on their shows like they're actually proving some profound point.
TRIGGERnometry@triggerpod

“From Destiny's standpoint, there's no such thing as a moral fact. None. They don't exist. Everything is dependent upon stance.” What are the philosophical underpinnings behind the left–right divide? Andrew Wilson @paleochristcon breaks it down: moral relativism vs moral realism. Subjective vs objective truth. Rights vs duties. Progress vs tradition. That’s the real clash.

English
351
158
4K
417.1K
Nate
Nate@ChivalrousCHAD·
@KENJEEZY85 @samtripoli The true matriarchy could only ever exist as a theoretical construct.
English
0
0
0
21
Best Kenny of Earth!
Best Kenny of Earth!@KENJEEZY85·
@samtripoli That's actually pretty simple. They are not the biggest enforcers of patriarchy. Otherwise, they would fulfill the traditional female gender role. The answer and reality are that they are the biggest enforcers of the matriarchy. They are winning.
English
1
0
0
304
Sam Tripoli
Sam Tripoli@samtripoli·
Hahahaha
Filipino
26
186
1.5K
39.3K
Nate
Nate@ChivalrousCHAD·
@highlandgirl24 There’s a decent chance he’s going to be cast as the next James Bond
English
0
0
0
19