Marina Jakobsen
15.4K posts

Marina Jakobsen
@Chokurei51
Love of the nature, Human beings, politics, Philosophy, Theology, and the Great Spirit. Ph.d.
Denmark Katılım Ekim 2010
524 Takip Edilen371 Takipçiler
Marina Jakobsen retweetledi

Hillary Clinton admits she has been working in the shadows regarding all the chaos currently taking place in the Middle East, particularly in Lebanon.
Clinton is advocating for an alliance between the current Lebanese government and Israel.
“I’ve been advocating behind the scenes for this for several months.”
English
Marina Jakobsen retweetledi

CHINA BLOCKADES BABOON OF BARBARIA'S BLOCKADE
It took only a few words by Chinese Minister of Defense, Admiral Dong Jun.
Especially this segment:
"Our ships are moving in and out of the waters of the Strait of Hormuz. We have trade and energy agreements with Iran. We will respect and honour them and expect others not to meddle in our affairs. Iran controls the Strait of Hormuz and it is open for us.”
Does CENTCOM have the balls to go to war against China?
Obviously not.
Ergo...
English
Marina Jakobsen retweetledi
Marina Jakobsen retweetledi

STRAIGHT TO THE POINT(S)
Iran's 10-point plan is eminently reasonable.
1. Iron-clad guarantees that Iran will NOT be attacked again (Epstein Syndicate will never agree).
2. Permanent end to the war, NOT just a ceasefire.
3. End to Israeli strikes on Lebanon (death cult will never agree).
4. Lifting of ALL US sanctions on Iran (Capitol Hill will never agree)
5. End to all regional fighting against the Axis of Resistance (Epstein Syndicate will never agree).
6. Iran opens the Strait of Hormuz (already open, but not for Epstein Syndicate).
7. Iran charges a Hormuz fee of $2 million per ship (already in effect).
8. Iran splits the fees with Oman (already under discussion).
9. Iran provides rules for safe passage through Hormuz (already in effect).
10. Hormuz fees will be used for Iran reconstruction - instead of reparations.
Reasonable. On the table. On the record. The whole Global South is watching.
English

@X22Report It was open before the attack and it’s open! Just not for belligerent parties and allies!
English
Marina Jakobsen retweetledi

Follow me through this rabbit hole.
Rockwool, a Danish company that makes insulation products, has no history of challenging wars or aggression by NATO or the US.
It operated in Russia until 2022, when it exited — leaving behind 1,200 employees and four factories.
What happened next: local managers and workers kept the plants running.
According to reports, Rockwool has continued to receive profits, reportedly up to $400 million.
But it gets better. Russian buyers tried to acquire the business. Rockwool refused to sell, despite no longer wanting to manage it.
Refusing to engage with Russia has become a common, and costly, pattern for many in the EU.
Rick Sanchez@RickSanchezTV
American companies like PepsiCo are still operating in Russia, while EU firms like Rockwool exited and took losses. Now they’re complaining that Russia may nationalize their assets. These aren’t rational decisions — it’s pure stupidity. Rudi Kennes, MEP for Belgium: “It wasn’t clever, no. They’re not even acting in their own interests.”
English
Marina Jakobsen retweetledi

Dear Friends, Followers and Subscribers, our dear Americans,
Seeing as one and all are reminiscing about Charlie Kirk today in light of the Iran war, I thought I would make something that happened crystal clear.
Minds are for changing, and when the facts change we change our minds.
We had dinner with Charlie Kirk in London last May 2025, and when Charlie I walked privately after dinner in Hyde Park, Charlie told me then that in his view Bibi Netanyahu was a psychopath and that the actions taken by his government in Gaza were psychopathic.
We already knew that, so it was no shock to me, but it was good to see that his evaluation and capacity to observe the obvious was present and sane.
Charlie had completely changed his mind and his position on Israel from when I first met him in Dec 2018, and in May 2025 he did not support their actions in Gaza or many of the actions of their government, particularly their growing destructive influence in America.
Previously he had been one of Israel’s biggest champions, so this was indeed a complete change. We had witnessed his support of Israel previously as we had visited Israel with him in spring 2019 when he had held almost completely the opposite view.
Charlie was also totally against any military engagement with Iran by America. And he told me in London that he had written a few days previously to Israeli leadership to express his disappointment.
Erika, Charlie’s wife, shortly afterward on June 17th and 18th, communicated to us that she suported Charlie completely concerning his view of the insanity of involving the US in a war with Iran and the importance his attempts to achieve a peaceful resolution.
And she communicated that directly to us in writing.
She also, and most importantly, indicated that she did not agree with how biblical scripture was being used and was being twisted by pastors and politicians to justify their support of military action.
This discussion is historically important in the light of discussions about dispensationalism* (see definition below) and how the Bible is being interpreted today by many politicians and military leaders to justify the current war.
She stated very clearly that “the pastors” in Charlie’s orbit were “hungry for war.”
That was her worry at that time, and Erika was VERY disturbed by it.
Charlie was not alone in his views.
Many feel the same way today.
The elderly in America and the boomer generation seem to be somewhat unconscious on the subject of harmful Israeli government action and how it affects the entire future of America and the world.
Charlie’s view was that most of the youth of today will never forgive Israel for the needless slaughter of innocent children in Gaza, and he suspected that they would not forgive Trump for a future war with Iran either.
Charlie did his best to warn President Trump about this and what voters and the Trump base were telling him on June 18 last year.
He did this knowingly at great personal risk to his personal relationship and friendship with the President.
Today, the youth of the world and young voters in America, on the whole, have recognised that Trump’s actions in Iran are insane and that they have been encouraged by psychopaths.
I personally believe that there is a possibility that Charlie was executed for his efforts to prevent the Iran war.
This is my opinion.
This matter and Charlie’s execution should be completely investigated.
If an American citizen was executed by a foreign power for expressing their opinion, then we should be aware of that.
I am not alone in that thought either.
Charlie was one of my best friends; we communicated directly (often daily) since April 2018. We achieved a tremendous amount together.
I have strong reason to believe that there is a possibility that he has been betrayed by several of those around him.
@RealCandaceO @CarriePrejean1 @TuckerCarlson @BretWeinstein @piersmorgan @IanCarrollShow

English
Marina Jakobsen retweetledi

The more I watch things unfold, the more I feel people are completely misreading what’s actually happening…
Everyone keeps reducing it to something simple: that Trump’s proximity to Israel automatically means alignment, but that is not the case.
Let’s not lose sight of Trump’s main aim: the draining of the swamp, not just in the US but globally.
Israel is a very big part of that swamp. It controls a massive network of power that operates through politics, intelligence, money, blackmail, media, all of it intertwined and embedded deep inside Washington and far beyond. This is the type of enemy that you don’t just come out and confront directly, you couldn’t, it would be political suicide at best and something far worse at worst, (let’s remember Charlie), so the idea that this would ever be handled in a direct, obvious way has never made sense to me.
What would make sense, however, is something far more strategic, something that requires proximity rather than distance, because you can’t expose something like that from the outside, you have to get close enough to see it clearly, close enough to let it reveal itself, and more importantly, close enough for others to start seeing it too.
And this is where it gets really interesting, because the shift we are witnessing is not coming from where you would expect; it’s not the Democrats leading this conversation, it’s not the usual critics of Trump. It’s coming from people who have been close to him for years, people he trusts, people who have had access to him. They are the ones now speaking openly about Israel, about influence, about pressure, about how far that reach actually goes, even when doing so reflects badly on Trump himself.
That is not something people should just brush aside, because it raises a much bigger question; why would those voices risk undermining him publicly? Maybe because there is a larger process unfolding.
If Trump himself came out and said all of this directly it would be dismissed immediately, shut down before it even had a chance to land, and more importantly, he would be putting America in danger. (Remember, Israel is a bigger threat than Iran, it’s Israel that has nuclear weapons.)
But when the narrative starts shifting through multiple voices, when the contradictions begin to surface organically, when people start noticing patterns for themselves, something very different happens, perception begins to change.
To me, this war has never really been about Iran in the way it is being presented, Iran feels more like the stage on which something else is playing out, something that has been operating in the shadows for a very long time and is now being brought, slowly but deliberately, into the light.
And maybe that is why everything feels so confusing, so contradictory, because this isn’t a conventional conflict with clear lines and clear messaging, it feels far more like an exposure process.
And maybe that is the part people are not ready to consider yet… that what looks like compromise on the surface could in fact be sacrifice. Because in order to expose something of this magnitude, you may have to be willing to let your own image take the blow while the truth finds its way out through other voices.
English
Marina Jakobsen retweetledi

Alex Gibney received 1,000 hours of secret police interrogation videos of Benjamin Netanyahu. Here’s what he found.
0:00 Leaked Police Interrogation Footage of Netanyahu
10:30 Did Netanyahu Know About the October 7th Attacks Before They Happened?
13:35 Is the Iran War an Attempt by Netanyahu to Stay in Power?
15:21 Do Israelis Like Netanyahu?
16:44 What Are Netanyahu’s Religious Views?
20:31 Netanyahu’s Attempt to Kill the Documentary
26:48 Will Gibney Suffer Any Consequences for Making This Documentary?
English
Marina Jakobsen retweetledi
Marina Jakobsen retweetledi














