Chris Tuttle

Today a friend joined us to cheer on medical & other essential workers who are doing the most. 💚#ClapBecauseWeCare #clapbecausewecareNYC

@nvanwyen @Travis_in_Flint Just to clarify, you're saying that the party that is fighting to save democracy & that promotes bipartisanship is going to misuse its power to suspend elections? And you think this because why exactly? Follow-up question, what news sources are you watching?

@Travis_in_Flint Do not be surprised if this administration suspends elections because of this.

@Andreas1406 Thank you! Very kind.

@ChrisTuttle Many happy wishes. Have a memorable day and a marvelous year ahead!

@CollinRugg @RedWave_Press @alx Except the judge didn't throw out 80% of the case. He didn't throw out anything, nor agree to... he simply said the fraud from before 2014 has to tie into the continued fraud since 2014 in order to be charged. Do you not understand this or are you purposely stoking the fire?

@RedWave_Press @alx The fact that the left-leaning judge threw out 80% of the case that easily proves Letitia James is a fraud.

BREAKING: Donald Trump takes somewhat of a victory lap at the New York courthouse, says the judge was "fair." He added that the judge agreed that the statute of limitations is in effect meaning transactions that closed before 2014 should be out of the case, therefore "80% of the case will be dropped." "I think that was very good. That last five minutes was outstanding because the judge essentially conceded that the statute of limitations is in effect, therefore about 80% of the cases over." WOW.

@305armyz @JohnPReagles @brunosylvie7 @NikkiFried @POTUS Pg 1, Para 3 of this DOJ doc shows all reported murders are counted (and have been since 1930): bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pd… Same with Crime Rate, all reported crimes are counted. oag.ca.gov/sites/all/file… The Clearance Rate would be the % of crimes reported that were prosecuted.

@305armyz @JohnPReagles @brunosylvie7 @NikkiFried @POTUS That's just not true. Where do you get your information? Murders are a type of homicide and will be counted as such –not just a mortality– regardless of whether or not anyone was ever charged or convicted of the crime.

My President! Thank you @POTUS

@305armyz @JohnPReagles @brunosylvie7 @NikkiFried @POTUS I grasp it and I'm not disagreeing with it. I'm saying it doesn't show what you're saying it does. But again, I think you know this... you're just trolling for an argument. Also, your "convictions" point is BS. Murders are not counted ONLY when there's a conviction.

@ChrisTuttle @JohnPReagles @brunosylvie7 @NikkiFried @POTUS Which part of 24% more homicides don't you grasp? Again, many stats are calculated if there are no convictions.

@305armyz @JohnPReagles @brunosylvie7 @NikkiFried @POTUS Your “gotcha” graphic shows how u either don’t understand data or ur purposely misusing it. If a rate goes down year after year, it’s a declining rate. Even if it’s still higher than in was 4yrs prior. Crime isn’t “drastically increasing.” it did in 2020 & now it’s declining.

@305armyz @JohnPReagles @brunosylvie7 @NikkiFried @POTUS So when I point out you’re wrong about not having 2023 data, you use that very data to inaccurately claim I’m wrong WHILE ALSO claiming it’s flawed because it “only” represents 30 of the largest populated areas of the nation. In the same tweet. 😆

@JohnPReagles @305armyz @brunosylvie7 @NikkiFried @POTUS Here's some more "work" that shows your "experience" isn't based in reality. Even if you want to ignore 2023 YTD stats showing some improvements since 2019-2022, we're still in a nearly two-decade low period for violent crimes. There's no need to fearmonger. I wish you well.

@JohnPReagles @305armyz @brunosylvie7 @NikkiFried @POTUS Dude, can you read? I did the work AND I linked it for you. And it says you can't see the big picture. And no, I don't "see it daily" & I live in 2 major cities. There are issues, but it IS improving. Your "experience" doesn't match the data or reality. Bet it's Faux News.

@JohnPReagles @305armyz @brunosylvie7 @NikkiFried @POTUS John, with respect, I don't think you saying an opinion without evidence or fact and then refusing to defend your opinion when asked a basic question like... "huh, where'd you get your info from?" is not "explaining" anything. In fact, you refused to explain.

@305armyz @ChrisTuttle @brunosylvie7 @NikkiFried @POTUS Yep. I gave up trying to explain it to him. He’s either that naïve, or he just likes being a troll,,,,,

@305armyz @JohnPReagles @brunosylvie7 @NikkiFried @POTUS It also backs up the "other side," because these issues aren't two-sided. They're complex...like the forest. It's not as simple as political parties cultivating division & fear to stir media coverage & fear-voting. Easier to spout opinions w/o facts & hide behind anon profiles.

@305armyz @JohnPReagles @brunosylvie7 @NikkiFried @POTUS That's not true. Over 30 major cities release data monthly or quarterly, & not just related to case prosecutions. If you take some time to discuss instead of argue, you'll see this data even backs up your argument. Partially. eg; counciloncj.org/mid-year-2023-…

@JohnPReagles @305armyz @brunosylvie7 @NikkiFried @POTUS Do you really care to see our country get better? ...to see crime decrease? ...to see communities come together? Are you be open to the possibility that you may not be right? That you may not see the whole picture? I'm open & asked to learn. You refused, focused on your trees.

@JohnPReagles @305armyz @brunosylvie7 @NikkiFried @POTUS An ironic idiom given your failure to grasp the big picture & only focus on limited sources, presumably right-wing media. Hard to know, since you refuse to defend your opinions. What's your purpose on XTwitter if you won't back up what you say. Just trolling?

@JohnPReagles @305armyz @brunosylvie7 @NikkiFried @POTUS John, you don't need to tell people what you've already said in an XTwitter thread. They're literally replying to our previous tweets where you said the exact same thing. Given your inability to understand XTwitter, forgive me if I doubt you understand research or objectivity.

Yep. Tryed to explain it to him, that he wasn’t looking at the right news outlets. He wanted me to give him facts, told him that I don’t do people’s work for them. If they do their own research, it sinks in better. There’s tons of research and evidence of such. But, he only believes in what he sees.

@305armyz @JohnPReagles @brunosylvie7 @NikkiFried @POTUS Hey, anonymous. Did you read the article John linked, that I replied to? It's about the FBI's newly collected data on police use-of-force incidents & the first-ever report released in 2019. Furthermore, major cities release data every month & we can already compare YTD. Try it?

@ChrisTuttle @JohnPReagles @brunosylvie7 @NikkiFried @POTUS FBI reporting isn't new ( first off). Furthermore, 2023 hasn't come out yet , but major cities are seeing large increases in crime, but again most of these are not recorded unless they are prosecuted. Lastly, 2023 hasn't come out yet since we are still in 2023

@305armyz @JohnPReagles @brunosylvie7 @NikkiFried @POTUS So, you linked an interview about police violence & how the FBI has finally started requiring reporting. But if you’re talking about the increase in homicides between 2019-2022, that’s true. But it’s 2023 now… care to share the data for 2023 YTD vs 2022?

@ChrisTuttle @JohnPReagles @brunosylvie7 @NikkiFried @POTUS What research have you done? When looking at homicide statistics alone they are up 42% higher vs 2019 ( pre pandemic) all robberies, theft ...etc are only tallied if they are convicted. fbi.gov/news/podcasts/…

@JohnPReagles @brunosylvie7 @NikkiFried @POTUS Hey again. So… I hear where you’re coming from, but I told you that I’ve done the research & can easily find gov & independent data (I don’t rely on media) showing that crime is not “out of control.” So I’m asking for you to share proof of your claim so that I CAN research it.

You are looking in the wrong place obviously. No. I will not “do your research” for you. And before you go ahaa!, you can’t prove it! I find that doing other people’s work for them is pointless. You provide information, they deny it, or call you a conspiracy theorist. You can see evidence of what I am referring specifically to, in the news daily. If you just look outside your normal “news”, you’ll see it. MSNBC, CNN won’t cover it, because they are not allowed to. Expand your coverage, like BBC, and other “outside” media sources. You’ll have all the proof you need.

@JohnPReagles @brunosylvie7 @NikkiFried @POTUS Hey! I appreciate your response & sharing a bit more about your thought process. As Bruno replied, I can quickly find public data that refutes your argument. Please share where you're getting your information from or any data that supports it?

Look at any “blue state” and the major cities in them. Complete lawlessness, due to progressive democrats policies, and no one is held accountable for their actions. Flash mobs hitting stores/businesses, businesses that have been there for decades are closing and leaving. People being assaulted/robbed/killed in broad daylight, out of control drug dealing and “zombies” walking around. All the while, the police departments are throttled back, because the city government’s demands it. Now, they are begging for federal help to deal with the problems.