chris vizzini

347 posts

chris vizzini

chris vizzini

@ChrisVizzini

Katılım Şubat 2016
8 Takip Edilen9 Takipçiler
chris vizzini
chris vizzini@ChrisVizzini·
@BarrettCreech @HumanistReport It means you've either already paid for it, or will pay for it afterwards. It does not mean it's free. And you know what you're doing with that assertion. We see you.
English
1
0
0
2
Mike Figueredo
Mike Figueredo@HumanistReport·
Conservatives truly have zero policy solutions to any of our fucking problems lol. Even your dumbass deserves to have more than just “price transparency.” You should have healthcare that’s free at the point of service like people in other countries.
Riley Gaines@Riley_Gaines_

It's been 7 months since we had our baby and we're still receiving unexplained hospital bills in the mail. Hardly ever an adequate description of services. Just a QR code to pay online. It feels intentionally confusing and difficult to get answers. We want price transparency.

English
151
280
2.5K
59.3K
chris vizzini
chris vizzini@ChrisVizzini·
@jxc @PushDemsLeft You're asking me to prove a negative. It's not my assertion. It's not my fact to disprove. It's their fact to prove. BUT we can look at the publicly available numbers, and as long as metrics are consistent compare the administrations to each other. Odd they didn't do that here
English
1
0
0
3
Gobbled Wobbles
Gobbled Wobbles@GobbledWobbles·
@xplorable @KyleTrainEmoji in a real economy youre almost always the buyer, who, once youve bought a house, stay in it, for life, often. and prices going down means more buyers, more people that are in the price range to buy a house.
English
3
0
18
125
Gobbled Wobbles
Gobbled Wobbles@GobbledWobbles·
@xplorable @KyleTrainEmoji why do they "dont have anymore money" the ammount of usable capital has stayed the same, noone is selling their house to buy groceries. to a normal person who boys a house to live in it, a house is a purchase, the money is already spent.
English
3
0
34
324
chris vizzini
chris vizzini@ChrisVizzini·
@Les_Aker @PotatoMcWhiskey And when it fails it's always because "capitalism" undermines it. They are so economically illiterate they can't even understand the irony of the statement above.
English
1
0
2
125
PotatoMcWhiskey
PotatoMcWhiskey@PotatoMcWhiskey·
I find it really weird that neoliberal types are like "this will be a disaster" Bro, its an experiment. What if it works? You should be thinking about the consequences of the results on your ideology not shouting it down. Sure it might fail, but what if it works?
Mayor Zohran Kwame Mamdani@NYCMayor

At our city-owned grocery stores, staples like eggs and bread will actually be affordable. And we're going to do it the right way, without cutting workers' pay or dignity. Because in the wealthiest city in this country, buying groceries shouldn't be an unsolvable equation. It should be simple, fair, and within reach for everyone.

English
501
295
3.5K
79.7K
chris vizzini
chris vizzini@ChrisVizzini·
@PotatoMcWhiskey What I find really weird is you didn't bother to read any actual critiques that state this has already been tried repeatedly with disastrous results. In some cases they even sunset the programs early. Major grocery stores run at 2-3% net...
English
0
0
0
187
Matt Walsh
Matt Walsh@MattWalshBlog·
I’m officially convinced. It was a hoax. The Trump Administration recruited a leftist Kamala Harris voting Trump hater to participate in a staged assassination that would include the shooter getting shot at and then locked in federal prison for the rest of his life. The Kamala Harris voter agreed to this plan, that works against his political and personal interests, because he’s just like a really generous guy. Meanwhile the Trump Administration, despite dastardly planning multiple assassination hoaxes, decided to keep their patsy alive and a permanent liability to them, rather than just killing him like they could have easily done. They did this because they also are really strangely generous in a very odd and specific way. So in summary we have a plot where all parties involved are working against their own interests with no real discernible benefit to any of them. There is no evidence of this plan and it doesn’t even make any intuitive sense and the motives for everyone are unclear if not insane, but still I believe it because I’m a very smart person.
English
11.5K
7K
74.5K
4.6M
chris vizzini
chris vizzini@ChrisVizzini·
@buckadeath What part of the strategy is having your leaders killed, your navy sunk, your air force blown up, and your entire military crumble in front of the entire world?
English
0
0
0
13
chris vizzini
chris vizzini@ChrisVizzini·
@prinkasusa And he infamously lost because of his massive failures on the international stage. This is like picking the Titanic to illustrate how safe ships are in icy waters.
English
0
0
2
2.3K
ً
ً@prinkasusa·
Jimmy Carter was the 39th U.S. President - and never ordered a single aerial bombing campaign against a foreign country. Every modern president before and after him did. Carter chose diplomacy where others chose firepower. His defining moment came at Camp David in 1978 - locking Egyptian and Israeli leaders in 13 days of brutal negotiation, emerging with a peace agreement that ended 30 years of war. His presidency faced the Iran hostage crisis, oil shocks and economic turmoil - crises that would have given any leader justification for military escalation. He held the line anyway. He received the Nobel Peace Prize in 2002. He died in 2024 at 100 years old. The man who never bombed anyone outlived almost every critic who called him weak.
@cessonmute

hit me with the harshest reality truth

English
653
4.6K
53.9K
2.6M
The Meme-Industrial Complex
The Meme-Industrial Complex@MemeIndustrial·
The US gets Palantir and the dumbest false flags in history meanwhile China has universal housing and healthcare and education and high-speed rail and TVs that do this
English
483
1.4K
17.4K
1.5M
KC
KC@KCKDesign·
@MattWalshBlog Just shut the fuck up and tweet about how we “need” a “ballroom” like the rest of your cucked colleagues, Matt.
KC tweet media
English
132
40
1.3K
45.8K