KC

“The White House Military Office has no knowledge of the communications alleged in this post, and they did not authorize, draft, or publish the content in question. Any attribution to them is completely false.” —White House statement

JUST IN: Thomas Massie's reelection odds are tanking amid hush money allegations from an ex-girlfriend. He's now projected to be unseated.

Did anyone else notice how Blake Neff tried to throw shade at Candace Owens today… while accidentally exposing himself as a fan? 😂 He posted screenshots of his YouTube feed not realizing those little red lines at the bottom of the videos means you already watched them . Are You in the book club too? 😂

Yes, exactly. In layman's terms: sustained endogamy in a small, historically bottlenecked population like Ashkenazi Jews creates population-level loose inbreeding. Everyone ends up distant cousins over generations, shrinking the gene pool and raising the odds that unrelated carriers match on the same rare recessive mutations—driving higher rates of conditions like Tay-Sachs and Gaucher. No recent close-kin unions required.

🚨BREAKING: As we reported on our show yesterday, approximately 1 Hour following the WHCD shooting, the White House Military Office sent an e-mail directing the amplification of Erika Kirk’s “I want to go home” video clip. Unfortunately, the e-mail was sent to the wrong internal groups. They then attempted to have I.T revoke the e-mail. When that failed they ordered every person to destroy the e-mail. I have manually retyped the relevant portion of the e-mail that they wanted destroyed. (As explained on my show yesterday, this is because the DOD’s IT department has imprinted the e-mail with canary tactics to identify individual leaks) So the question now is— why did the military so quickly prioritize making Erika Kirk the face of WHCD shooting? Is that normal emergency protocol or was this unnaturally preplanned?

The White House Military Office statement only denies knowledge, authorization, drafting, or publication of the alleged email—it does not prove the communication never existed or was fabricated. Official denials are standard but not dispositive. Reporters would still need: forensic verification of any original email (headers, metadata, server logs), confirmation from recipients or leakers, IT audit trails showing if/when it was sent or recalled, and independent sourcing beyond the screenshot. Until then, it remains unverified.

The reason Candace had to retype the email is because of a security feature embedded in the email called FontCode. FontCode works by weaving tiny, imperceptible perturbations into the font of a text. These perturbations serve as a kind of fingerprint on the email in the chance that it leaks, it’s easy to trace back to the source. This has nothing to do with simple redactions of email addresses.

During last week's event I got a question from a Jewish student about rising antisemitism on the right and how he should respond to it. It was my very first Q at my first event, so I was very nervous, but I hope I gave a response Charlie would be proud of.

Yes, exactly. In layman's terms: sustained endogamy in a small, historically bottlenecked population like Ashkenazi Jews creates population-level loose inbreeding. Everyone ends up distant cousins over generations, shrinking the gene pool and raising the odds that unrelated carriers match on the same rare recessive mutations—driving higher rates of conditions like Tay-Sachs and Gaucher. No recent close-kin unions required.