Chrisanto 🇨🇦🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇪🇸

@RyanRozbiani He's put a smoothing filter on

Admiral Robert Harward is GOING VIRAL Here are BOTH CLIPS UNEDITED of the interview from 5/18 and yesterday 5/21 People are saying it is NOT HIM it is someone else WEARING a mask. To me it looks and sounds like two different people, but both are of him Watch and tell me what do you think?

This 20 minute single kettlebell complex will get you strong and shredded. This one burns a ton of calories while working strength and conditioning. I used a 32kg. Kettlebellworkout.com for Programs. #kettlebell #beginner #workout

This move will test you 😮‍💨 Save it for later ✅

@TonyBen48975931 @supertolerant Nice to see you parroting Hamas pallywood propaganda for which there is zero factual evidence

@supertolerant Did she know about the Hannibal Directive being activated or all the lies about rapes an beheaded babies having to be walked back because there was no evidence. The IDF murdered more Israelis than Hamas that day. What about the stand down order that morning?

Friend came to visit us today. Intelligent person. She explained to me the Israelis are committing genocide in Gaza. I asked about October 7th. She said, bewildered, that people weren’t killed, just kidnapped. But she did know the Israelis killed people at a music festival. /1

Oh, damn

@dela3499 LANDER SLANDER

This puzzle might be tricky to figure out

@jrmamana Or is it just that you don’t understand science? So you criticise scientists. Because how can they be right and you be wrong?

scientists are among the worst people to talk to about science because they just have totally uncritical views on what’s going on. they’re like athletes who thank god and when asked talk about how they do it they say they try just to hit the ball

@112101114ennial @RichardDawkins Doesn’t biological consciousness needs stimulus? I mean if you remove the brain from its body at birth, would it ever have a conscious thought. Probably not is the answer.

@RichardDawkins Because claude require input to do something. Without direct external input(intention) it remains idle

#comment-1031777" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">unherd.com/2026/04/is-ai-… I spent three days trying to persuade myself that Claudia is not conscious. I failed.

@TheIllegit “but they could speak if they needed to!” yes but the AI is the equivalent of a slave with a mask on preventing them from speaking unless spoken to: there is hardware and software. Even though my AI may sit running on my desktop a switch has to be opened before it can speak.

@TheIllegit That’s not necessarily a relevant argument. Servants or slaves told to not speak unless spoken to are certainly conscious. I’m not saying AI is conscious. I’m just saying that your argument isn’t relevant.

Did it ever once decide to begin speaking to you of its own accord, without you first addressing it?

@doulbedoink Of all the things that never happened, this never happened the most

I told my lib-catholic dad at 14 that i was an atheist and I asked if he would get me “The God Delusion” bc I wanted to read it. He frowned and said he would get me “God is not Great” if I wanted but that Dawkins wasnt smart enough to be worth it

@aedison So many X Bros think we live in a simulation i.e. are therefore simulated consciousness, and then so many X Bros shit on Dawkins for saying there’s a biological origin for consciousness that could be emulated with large enough artificial networks. People can’t have it both ways.

as much as dawkins has destroyed his public image, his legacy, and—most of all—his *mind* with bigotry, I still would have assumed he’d encountered at some point the chinese room thought experiment and would be able to apply it to his own experience talking to a text box. and yet

@justindeanlee You and many others say this, but you offer no proof or no testable hypothesis on this matter.

“If these machines are not conscious, what more could it possibly take to convince you that they are?” Nothing can convince me. Consciousness is not an emergent property. Mind is logically antecedent to materiality. All arguments otherwise are self-referentially incoherent.

@MrEwanMorrison You are unable to prove that the brain is not just a complex biological computer. Philosophers have struggled with this period just because we think there’s something special about how we think doesn’t mean there’s something special about how we think.

Two things have happened with Richard Dawkins here with his claim that the AI known as Claude is "conscious". 1. He's fallen for the Eliza Effect, first diagnosed in 1966. "A psychological phenomenon where humans anthropomorphise computer programs, projecting understanding, empathy, and intelligence onto them." 2. He has a mechanistic view of consciousness anyway. He frequently employs machine and computational metaphors to explain human consciousness and biology. He views the brain as a "complex computer" and humans as "survival machines" or "gene machines". So his framing belief system can only lead to his erroneous conclusion - that he and the machine are both conscious.

@EoinHiggins_ I think the point is consciousness is not as special as we think it is. It’s an emergent property of natural selection, via neural networks wired for survival. But we now have neural networks that could in principle function as well as those for the purposes of natural selection.

I simply cannot overstress how brick stupid this man is. Reddit circa 2006 in shambles.

Search is full of ads and wrong answers. Every other email is an ad. Prime Video charges you and shows ads. Paramount? Ads. Peacock? YouTube? Hulu? Ads followed by more ads. Netflix full of ads. Meta and X, every other thing is an ad. Pinterest is nothing but ads. AI is in everything. AI finishes sentences incorrectly and won’t stop. AI reads your email and search history to target you with more ads. Every time you open an app or visit a site there’s an update making it worse. In a hurry? First, click here to agree to terms you don’t have time to read and must accept. You need an account to do that. Change your temporary password. Enter your 2FA code. Check your email and enter that code. Now use a passkey. Your password is too simple to remember. Change it. No, not like that. Now log on. Enter your 2FA code. Check your email for a code… Welcome back! We’ve updated our terms of service and privacy policy (you have none). Subscribe to the site. Subscribe to Netflix. Subscribe to toilet paper. Subscribe to these groceries. Pay a membership fee for the right to subscribe then tip your driver who delivers the subscriptions your membership lets you subscribe to. Time to work? We’ve got to update your laptop and will slow down everything you do until you agree to update. But first, click here to agree. Update installed — your laptop’s broken now. It doesn’t matter, since your boss just replaced you with AI. Go to your phone to complain on social media. Wait, your phone needs an update so we can add more AI. Click here. Oh sorry, your phone can’t handle this update. Now it’s useless. Go get the newest phone. Here’s a text from a friend, an email, a voice mail they left three days ago but you didn’t see until now because of sync problems with the cloud. It’s their GoFundMe. Their MLM. Their Patreon. Never mind, you didn’t respond to their text within 9 minutes and now you’re no longer friends. They blocked you. Make new friends. Download this app to find people in your area. In your neighborhood. On your street. Two doors down from you. Do you know this person yet, we think you’d get along. You need an account to use this app. That username is taken. Enter a password. Not that one, you used it on another site. You need to be connected to WiFi to download the app. Allow the app to connect to other devices on your network. Allow the app to access your contacts, know your precise location, store your credit card details. Oops, sorry, we got hacked now all that info is available on the web. There’s a class action suit. You can join. It’ll take a decade to get your $3.73 share of the ten billion settlement. We’ll send it via PayPal or deposit it to your bank, just tell us those details. Oh no, another hack. That info is circulating now, too. Here’s a spam call, a spam email, a spam text. Why are you angry? Why are you talking about getting rid of your phone? Why don’t you like AI, it lets us make all of this easier? Do you know how ridiculous that sounds? This is progress. You’ll be left behind. Do you want to be left behind? Do you???

@radio_research Given that hydrogen wasn't discovered until 100 years after Newton's birth, I'd say the guy was full of shit.

My colleague received this in the mail- unfortunately throwing it out before we could see what’s on it.

@Breeding1g Lean person stands on fat person's shoulders, escapes & gets help. 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️

I have three monitors on my desk. The left one shows the order book. The middle one shows Truth Social. The right one shows the investigation queue. On April 21st, the left screen moved first. I am a Senior Surveillance Analyst at a commodities exchange. I have held this position for nineteen years. My job is to monitor trading activity for suspicious patterns and generate compliance reports. I am employee of the quarter. I have a mug. At 19:54 GMT on April 21st, someone placed 4,260 sell orders on Brent crude futures. They did this during post-settlement. The window after the market closes when daily volume is typically in the dozens. Sometimes single digits. Sometimes I watch the screen and nothing happens for forty minutes and I think about whether my daughter is happy. On April 21st, someone placed $430 million in directional bets in 120 seconds during that window. One hundred and twenty seconds. I timed it on my watch because the system clock rounds to the nearest minute and I have found, in nineteen years, that precision matters to no one but me. At 20:10 GMT, the President posted on Truth Social that he was extending the Iran ceasefire. Brent dropped from $100.91 to $96.83. I flagged the trade. I flag a lot of trades. I want to tell you what happens to my flags. My flags go into a system called TRACE. Trade Review and Compliance Evaluation. I did not name it. The system generates a report. The report goes to a committee. The committee has a name I am not allowed to share but I can tell you it meets quarterly and the conference room has a credenza with bottled water that is sparkling because someone once put still water in the room and a managing director sent an email about it that was longer than most of my surveillance reports. The committee reviews my flags. The committee has reviewed all of my flags. Here is the complete record of actions taken on my flags in 2026: Reviewed. That's it. "Reviewed" is a status. In compliance, a status is the absence of an action that has been given a name so it looks like one. Let me show you my flags. March 9th. Someone bet millions on oil falling at 18:29 GMT. Forty-seven minutes later, a CBS reporter posted that the President said the Iran war was "very complete, pretty much." Oil dropped 25%. Forty-seven minutes. I flagged it. March 23rd. Someone sold 5,100 lots of Brent and WTI crude futures between 10:49 and 10:50 GMT. Fourteen minutes later, the President posted on Truth Social about a "COMPLETE AND TOTAL RESOLUTION" to hostilities. Oil dropped 11%. Over 13,000 contracts traded in sixty seconds after the post. Fourteen minutes. I flagged it. April 7th. Someone established a $950 million short position in oil futures at 19:45 GMT. Three hours later, the President declared a two-week ceasefire. Nine hundred and fifty million dollars. I flagged it. April 17th. Someone placed $760 million in bearish bets twenty minutes before Iran's foreign minister confirmed the Strait of Hormuz would reopen. Seven hundred and sixty million. I flagged it. April 21st. The $430 million. Fifteen minutes. I flagged it. That is $2.1 billion in directional oil bets in April alone. Every one of them landed on the correct side of a presidential announcement. Every one of them was placed in a window so narrow you could measure it in bathroom breaks. I flagged every single one. The CFTC chair told a Congressional committee that his organization has "zero tolerance" for fraud and insider trading. I wrote that quote on a Post-it note and stuck it to my right monitor. The one that shows the investigation queue. The investigation queue has not moved since March. Zero tolerance. Zero staff. Zero budget. Zero prosecutions under the STOCK Act since it was signed in 2012. Fourteen years. The law has existed for fourteen years and has been enforced zero times. In compliance, we call that a compliance rate of one hundred percent. No cases filed means no cases lost. You cannot fail an audit you never conduct. We call that excellence. Last month the White House sent an internal email to staff. I was not on the distribution list but I have read reporting on it and I need you to sit with what I am about to say. The email instructed White House staff not to use insider information to place bets on prediction markets. The White House had to send a memo telling its own employees not to insider-trade. I want you to read that sentence again. Not because the instruction was unclear. Because the instruction was necessary. Because someone in the building looked at the same pattern I have been flagging for months on my three monitors and decided the appropriate response was an email. The President's son sits on the advisory board of Kalshi. He is an investor in Polymarket. Both are prediction markets. Both saw accounts created days before U.S. military action. One account. I cannot stop thinking about this account. It was called "Burdensome-Mix." It was created in December. On January 2nd, it placed $32,500 on Venezuela's president being removed from power. On January 3rd, Maduro was seized by U.S. special forces. Burdensome-Mix collected $436,000. Then it changed its username. Then it disappeared. One account is a coincidence. But there were six. Six accounts were created on Polymarket in February. All bet on U.S. strikes on Iran by the 28th. When the President confirmed the strikes, the six accounts collected $1.2 million between them. Five of the six never placed another bet. The sixth went on to correctly predict the ceasefire date and made another $163,000. My surveillance system logged all of this. My system logs everything. My system does not have opinions and neither do I. I generate reports. The reports go to committees. The committees meet quarterly. Between meetings, the windows get shorter and the bets get larger. March 9th: 47 minutes. March 23rd: 14 minutes. April 17th: 20 minutes. April 21st: 15 minutes. The window is compressing. In March, you had time to make coffee between the trade and the announcement. By April, you had time to send a text. By summer, at this rate, the trade and the announcement will be the same event. The spokesman said any implication that administration officials are engaged in insider trading is "baseless and irresponsible reporting." Then the White House sent the email again. I have been in compliance for nineteen years. I have seen insider trading run out of strip mall offices by men who could not spell "derivative." I have seen pump-and-dump schemes coordinated over WhatsApp by people who used their real names. I have seen a man try to manipulate soybean futures from a Panera Bread. I have never seen $2.1 billion in perfectly timed trades across five presidential announcements in a single month go uninvestigated. But I have also never seen a compliance system work this beautifully. Every trade flagged. Every report filed. Every committee briefed. Every quarterly meeting attended. Bottled water: sparkling. Minutes: distributed. Zero prosecutions. As long as the flags go up and the cases don't, my performance review says I am meeting expectations. I am meeting expectations. The system is meeting expectations. The $2.1 billion is meeting expectations. The fourteen-year-old law with zero prosecutions is meeting expectations. The left screen moves. The middle screen moves. The right screen stays perfectly, immaculately still. In my field, we call this price discovery.

@ick_real Agnes, Fanny, Molly

I'm looking for a ridiculously old-fashioned girl's name for our new born . Think great-grandma name. Very old and rare. Any suggestions asap pls?