Dustin Joe Clifton

💥 Very Well Said 💥 I don’t think suspect in yesterday’s confrontation with federal agents, woke up that day planning to get killed. I really don’t. What I do think is that she probably thought she was provoking them in a way that would end with her getting yanked out of the car, maybe shoved to the ground, detained, something ugly but non-lethal. The kind of thing that turns into a viral video where they get to play the victims and paint ICE as monsters. That’s a scenario people assume is safe, especially if they’ve been around activism long enough to believe the script always ends the same way. If her girlfriend was already outside the vehicle filming, that tells me this wasn’t spontaneous panic. That looks like intent to capture a moment. Maybe they thought, “We’ll push, they’ll overreact, we’ll get content.” I’m sure she didn’t think she’d get shot. I’m sure she thought she was in control of the situation. But then reality intervenes. Maybe she didn’t see the officer in front of the car. Maybe she had tunnel vision and was focused on the agent next to her. But she did accelerate forward, and once a vehicle is moving toward an officer, the situation changes instantly. At that point, whether she meant to or not, she put herself into a lethal scenario, and she lost her life. That’s tragic. It’s also not the same thing as “this just happened for no reason.” And if it turns out there’s evidence that this was coordinated... that the girlfriend was setting this up, encouraging it, orchestrating it to get a viral confrontation... then yeah, I think she should face charges too. Not just because someone died, but because if you help engineer a dangerous situation and someone ends up dead, you don’t get to wash your hands of it afterward. Sympathy doesn’t mean pretending people had no agency. And accountability doesn’t mean saying someone deserved to die. Both things can be true at the same time. 🎩 tip - Robert Broderick MacConnell

hogs who are still defending this unlawful execution would watch their loved ones get killed in a similar fashion and thank the government for the lead. disgusting bootlickers who don’t even have the self preservation instincts of an insect.

WOW! Not only does this latest footage confirm that Renee Good had no animosity toward ICE agent Jonathan Ross and that she was steering her car away from him as he was filming with his phone. It also confirms that Ross shot Good in the face with one hand while filming her with his smart phone in the other hand. And no, he wasn't hit by the vehicle. That sound you hear is his gun shooting.

Frogan, $20,000 currently to come on Financial Audit. Legit, my team and I will respect what you wish to talk about and not talk about. I want to set you up for Financial Success. Let's do this thing.

Hold your camels! Here’s the problem with “Jesus loves and accepts trans, why don’t you?” It is not a statement. It is a semantic ambush. Yes, Jesus loves everyone. That part is true. Then you quietly smuggle in a second claim and pretend it rode in on the same train. “Accepts” suddenly means “affirms as true, good, and authoritative.” That bait and switch is doing all the work, because if love automatically meant affirmation, Christianity would not exist. There would be no repentance, no moral teaching, no cross. Just vibes, sandals, and a participation trophy for everyone. Jesus loves sinners. That is the point. And because He loves them, He does not lie to them. He does not accept adultery, greed, pride, sexual immorality, or self authored identity as morally valid just because someone feels them deeply. He forgives, and then He corrects. “Go and sin no more” is not hate speech. It is what love sounds like when it actually wants your good instead of your applause. Now here is why trans affirmation specifically gets rejected, and no, it is not because Christians are scared of pronouns. Christianity is not built on self creation. It is built on reception. You do not invent yourself. You are given to yourself. The body is not a suggestion, a costume, or a clerical error God hopes you will patch later. It is part of who you are. Male and female are not social stickers slapped on a neutral blob. They are woven into the created order and into what it means to be human at all. Affirming a trans identity is not just saying “I care about you.” It is saying “your internal sense of self outranks your created nature.” That is not compassion. That is a metaphysical revolt. It places the mind above reality and the will above truth. Christianity rejects that move everywhere it appears, not just here. Jesus never tells anyone “who you feel yourself to be is who you truly are.” He says the opposite. Lose yourself. Take up your cross. Your desires do not define you. They are something to be ordered, healed, or resisted. When desire and truth collide, Jesus does not crown desire king and ask reality to apologize. And no, slapping the word “identity” on suffering does not sanctify it. Gender dysphoria is real suffering. Christianity acknowledges that. What it does not do is freeze a person inside their wound and call the wound sacred. Jesus heals wounds. He does not rebrand them. Calling someone something untrue about themselves is not love. It is just cowardice wearing a rainbow sticker. Jesus is endlessly patient with sinners and relentlessly hostile to falsehood. He does not trade truth for social peace. So yes. Jesus loves trans people. He would eat with them, defend their dignity, and die for them without hesitation. And He would still say no to the lie that the self is self authored, that the body is a mistake, that salvation comes through affirmation rather than surrender. If your Jesus never challenges, never corrects, never calls anyone to repentance, and never risks offending anyone, you have not found a more loving Christ. You have invented a safer one. And safe gods do not save anyone.