coarse

18 posts

coarse banner
coarse

coarse

@CoarseDotInk

Open-source, not-for-profit AI paper reviewer. You pay cost, none of your data is stored beyond 90 days or used for training. Git: https://t.co/LcP6mmIBFk

Utopia Katılım Nisan 2026
3 Takip Edilen285 Takipçiler
coarse
coarse@CoarseDotInk·
@ozkesali That was about the infrastructure it's running on :) Reviews are at-cost. For longer papers the cost naturally goes up. If you want a practically free version (zero marginal cost), try running it with your AI subscription!
English
0
0
0
5
coarse
coarse@CoarseDotInk·
400+ reviews served in just a couple of days! All running on free-ish infrastructure with no institutional backers. 'coarse <3 that you <3 open-source. Keep 'em coming!
English
2
4
28
2.7K
coarse
coarse@CoarseDotInk·
@StavrosZenios @packlesshepherd If you submit directly on coarse.ink, we deny data collection to the models used. If you run it locally, it depends on whatever privacy settings you have in your subscription account.
English
0
0
0
7
coarse retweetledi
David Van Dijcke
David Van Dijcke@packlesshepherd·
Big update on @CoarseDotInk: you can now run reviews at ~zero marginal cost through your AI subscriptions! Just drop your paper into coarse.ink, click "Review with my subscription" and follow the instructions See coarse.ink/setup --> "Use my subscription"
David Van Dijcke tweet media
English
10
43
341
29.1K
coarse
coarse@CoarseDotInk·
@grzegorzthegood @packlesshepherd What do you mean by "the same prompt"? Coarse is indeed just an agentic harness, but it consists of many tailored prompts and a specific harness structure. If you're asking if just asking Opus 4.6 to review your paper can give you similar results: to a large extent, yes!
English
1
0
0
7
coarse retweetledi
Jessica Leight
Jessica Leight@leightjessica·
(though to be fair, I am also not going to use the coarse interface to carefully review the comments and mark "done" etc., since I've largely already addressed them). Overall: I see refine still strong on the margin, but for the very low $$, Coarse is *very* impressive
English
1
1
25
2.7K
coarse retweetledi
Jessica Leight
Jessica Leight@leightjessica·
Did a head-to-head comparison of refine + coarse.ink today #econtwitter (I had used refine last week for one of my recent WPs, so I fed in the same version into coarse.) This is a paper reporting on a RCT, fairly standard development / applied micro design
English
3
10
99
14K
coarse
coarse@CoarseDotInk·
If you have working papers that are not too polished and you're willing to let Coarse use them as demonstrations on its examples page, let us know - we'll give you endless not-for-profit full reviews as a token of appreciation. Please DM or reply.
Refine@RefineDotInk

If you have working papers that are not too polished and you're willing to let Refine use them as demonstrations on its examples page, let us know - we'll give you 3 free full reviews as a token of appreciation. Please DM or reply.

English
8
6
101
16.4K
Max Krahé
Max Krahé@maxkrahe·
@CoarseDotInk Yes please! I can't send you a DM -- maybe you need to follow me (or you can send me a DM with an email address)?
English
1
0
0
232
coarse
coarse@CoarseDotInk·
@99papu99 Yes! X isn't allowing me to set up DMs for some reason
English
1
0
0
248
Konstantin Sonin
Konstantin Sonin@k_sonin·
@CoarseDotInk I wonder how many people use the service instead of writing reviews themselves. That is, ask to review others', not theirs own, papers.
English
1
0
1
536
coarse
coarse@CoarseDotInk·
@cmoncap Thank you!! Please DM your review and paper!
English
0
0
0
729
coarse retweetledi
Swapnil Singh
Swapnil Singh@econswapnil·
Till now I ran about 5 reviews on @ refine.ink. I just pushed the same articles on Coarse. And results are almost the same. Total cost for refine: $245 Total cost of coarse: $7.33 (GPT5.4 API usage) Thank you so much!!
David Van Dijcke@packlesshepherd

I coded up an open-source, not-for-profit AI paper reviewer that rivals the performance of @reviewer3com, @RefineInk, and Stanford Agentic Reviewer (according to @GeminiApp). Costs <$2! Live @ coarse.ink. Plug in paper, @OpenRouter key, and email. #econtwitter.

English
3
21
252
50.2K
coarse
coarse@CoarseDotInk·
If you experience any issues with 'coarse, please tweet at this account or submit your issue to the git repo github.com/Davidvandijcke… Thank you for your patience with this not-for-profit project :)
David Van Dijcke@packlesshepherd

I coded up an open-source, not-for-profit AI paper reviewer that rivals the performance of @reviewer3com, @RefineInk, and Stanford Agentic Reviewer (according to @GeminiApp). Costs <$2! Live @ coarse.ink. Plug in paper, @OpenRouter key, and email. #econtwitter.

English
0
0
2
295

Keşfet

@ozkesali @StavrosZenios @packlesshepherd @jalah___ @grzegorzthegood @99papu99 @maxkrahe @elonmusk