

Coch II
4.9K posts

@Coch_II
Scientifique, libéral jusqu'au bout des ongles, déteste les vérités obligatoires et les mensonges imposés. Breizh-fan :)
















Orban admitted his defeat‼️ Historic moment for Hungary 🇭🇺


🚨🚨🚨🚨 BREAKING NEWS: 🧵 Four peer-reviewed papers by @jcohler just dismantled the entire scientific foundation of the AGW hypothesis. Not chipped away at it. Dismantled it. Here’s what that actually means. The IPCC’s case for dangerous human-caused warming rests on three empirical pillars: 1.The Earth is warming (GMST) 2.Warming is driven by elevated CO₂ 3.The CO₂ rise is anthropogenic and permanent All three are now gone. Pillar 1 — GMST is physically meaningless. Temperature is an intensive property. You cannot average the temperatures of disjoint physical systems and get a quantity that means anything. The result is a number, not a temperature. The Physical Tether Theorem (Cohler, 2026) proves this formally and rigorously, grounded in representational measurement theory, operationalism, and classical thermodynamics. Every canonical formalization of classical science leads to the same conclusion. GMST does not exist as a physical quantity. Pillar 2 — The CO₂ rise is natural. Cohler & Soon (2026) show that mass-balance analysis, isotopic data, and 500 million years of temperature-CO₂ precedence all point the same direction: natural processes explain the observed CO₂ rise with no detectable anthropogenic contribution. Temperature leads CO₂, not the other way around — at every timescale. Pillar 3 — The Bern model is empirically falsified. The IPCC claims CO₂ persists in the atmosphere for millennia, justifying permanent emissions restrictions. The actual CO₂ residence time is 3.5–4 years. The bomb-¹⁴C pulse from nuclear testing — a clean, real-world tracer experiment — decays as a single exponential over 55+ years, directly falsifying the Bern model’s multi-exponential structure and permanent airborne fraction. This isn’t a modeling dispute. It’s falsification by data. Bonus: The energy accounting is also invalid. Cohler et al. (2026) show that Argo-based ocean heat content estimates violate the scientific method at every step, and that true EEI uncertainty exceeds ±1 W/m² — an order of magnitude larger than IPCC reports — making the Earth Energy Imbalance statistically indistinguishable from zero. The IPCC has no valid thermometer. No valid calorimeter. No valid CO₂ attribution model. No valid energy accounting. Without valid metrics there is no measurement. Without measurement there is no empirical claim. Without an empirical claim, AGW is not a scientific hypothesis. It is a conjecture — built on physically meaningless constructs and a falsified model — on which the world has spent trillions of dollars. That’s not a political statement. It’s a logical one. Papers: papers.jcohler.com














Après avoir dit vouloir tester les talibans, Flahaut salue la Chine qui vient aider l'Iran....Sans commentaire....



