Oliver🏴‍☠️

My hardship is the adventure I’ve been waiting for. Every struggle, a chapter. Every setback, a scene. This is where the story gets good.

@RhysSullivan Doesn’t it depend?

codex is a better model anyways

@VadimYuryev This…

MacBook Neo will start to REALLY shine with the A19 Pro with 12GB of memory and (hopefully) faster SSD Perfomance.

@theniteshdev @andrewjclare Never used it, I been reading it’s doing well actually.

@CodeWithOllie @andrewjclare correct, its just like chromebook ?

air or neo?

@burkov Gemini is thrash.

GPT-5.4 > Opus 4.6 And Google still doesn't have anything even remotely competitive.

@baanditeagle @PaulSolt Just realised what you typed lol

@CodeWithOllie @PaulSolt No it’s not, it’s the same and the limits are wild!

Have you tried Gemini for code review?

@PaulSolt GPT... but man... I miss a good 4.6 level of design... for my business use cases... and writing...

GPT-5.4 vs. Opus 4.6 Which is writing most of your code?

@LLMJunky It’s still in beta anyways, I don’t know why benchmarks use it and not explicitly say this.

While I haven't tried GPT's 1 million context window, I fully agree with this. There's really two things here: 1) OpenAI's compaction endpoint is absolutely incredible. Unless you're reading some very large files that simply cannot reasonably fit into the normal 256k-400k context window, I see no meaningful benefit. I have been letting Codex run to context window limits repeatedly for months and I never notice any degradation in intelligence. No idea how they do it. 2) As Sero said, subagents. I basically orchestrate with swarms universally now. When you have subagents working through a well-developed spec sheet, you are rarely even compacting anyway. And even when you do, see point 1. Furthermore, I prefer to write my specs to a markdown file for my subagents to work through, add logs, etc, so the orchestration agent knows exactly what is going on at any given time regardless. I think its great that there's a 1M context window, and I hope that performance improves while using it, but I *basically* don't care at all about it right now. I will say though, using Opus 4.6, the 1M context window is absolutely fantastic because unlike GPT models, I don't like to let Opus compact at all. I do find that it reduces performance, and so having the extra headroom completely changes the UX using Claude. Also it works very well. So all of this is to drive the point home that while large context windows are desired, and I am excited about getting them, it is not the most important factor to consider.

@AntoniaBVasile @OpenAIDevs Gemini is trash! I use Claude and ChatGPT exclusively. Well, I like the image models from Gemini.

@CodeWithOllie @OpenAIDevs I use chatGPT for strategy- google Ads Agency+ creativity with gemini+ some with claude now+some with grok( as agency we also serve an adult store ecommerce so any ai except grok is shy)

We’re introducing GPT-5.4 mini and nano, our most capable small models yet. GPT-5.4 mini is more than 2x faster than GPT-5 mini. Optimized for coding, computer use, multimodal understanding, and subagents. For lighter-weight tasks, GPT-5.4 nano is our smallest and cheapest version of GPT-5.4. openai.com/index/introduc…

@robinebers I am going to join you, when are you starting?

should I run a 30-day Codex challenge? nothing but Codex app for a month documenting works and what doesn’t

@robinebers Build it and share it!

can anyone help me with this? has anyone built a skill that lets Codex invoke headless Claude Code for copywriting and design changes? else I might built one to fill Codex gaps myself

@thesayannayak Codex.

Google uses Python. Netflix uses Python. Instagram was built with Python. Spotify uses Python. NASA uses Python. Amazon uses Python. Reddit uses Python. What’s stopping you from learning Python ? 🐍

@nadzi_mouad Wtf was codex max???

Codex model selector in 2026 be like 😂 they promised they’ll fix it… but you still have to: Scroll through GPT-5.4 GPT-5.4-Mini GPT-5.3-Codex GPT-5.2-Codex GPT-5.2 GPT-5.1-Codex-Max GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini …and counting THEN pick your reasoning level Low / Medium / High / Extra High The list is only getting longer and longer

@JosephNWalker How? Do you have a tutorial on how to use them together? Like a system of sorts?

Obsidian x Claude Code has been a game changer for me. I’m maybe 20-30% more productive. Is anyone else finding this?

@rohandotnagpal @DanielP1973235 @OpenAIDevs Someone gets it. And this transfers to other area, like I need to make presentations. ChatGPT just can’t do it. Even in how it writes it just still feels too “quanty” and not business like. Maybe I can fix the business writing with a prompt?

@DanielP1973235 @CodeWithOllie @OpenAIDevs ChatGPT for excel is quite solid. But yeah OpenAI has some way to go in nailing down design. The wireframes the models generate are ass and they’re even worse at following wireframes.

@LLMJunky KO, am.will wins. Health and ran out 🤪

damn openai really fell off. no usage resets in over six days. just when you think you know someone nothing stings like betrayal maybe tomorrow at 11

@YouyrI3070 @OpenAIDevs It’s not in the level of opus.

@CodeWithOllie @OpenAIDevs They LITERALLY have it

@thsottiaux Is there a way for you to have simple tasks delegated by gpt4 standard to mini? Like exploring code bases and stuff. I know, silly me, I can just write my own agent for that and have my main agent always sue it to expire.

Yesterday we launched subagents in Codex. Today we released GPT-5.4-Mini, which is SoTA in its category. Coincidence or genius move?

@JasonBotterill I’ll believe it when I see real world performance.

5.4-mini is roughly Sonnet 4.6 intelligence but 70% cheaper and like 3x faster

@DanielP1973235 @OpenAIDevs Well... I would't count out ChatGPT for Excel... I think its best at it... but Opus does better communication in my opinion..

@CodeWithOllie @OpenAIDevs Claude is best for excel, PowerPoint, word etc by a long shot