Marion Cobretti

14.7K posts

Marion Cobretti banner
Marion Cobretti

Marion Cobretti

@ColWilliamK1970

Left-wing lunacy is a disease. Meet the cure. Love collecting leftist pelts. Better bring your A game, if you have one. 😉

Los Angeles, USA Katılım Ekim 2022
603 Takip Edilen428 Takipçiler
Marion Cobretti retweetledi
Gunther Eagleman™
Gunther Eagleman™@GuntherEagleman·
How to know you’re in a cult, Democrat Edition: • Vote Blue no matter who • Get the shot or lose your job • Silence anyone who disagrees • Everyone else is a Nazi/Racist • Support BLM, LGBTQ & Abortion • Wave foreign flags over the American one • Blame Republicans & Trump for everything If this list sounds familiar… congratulations, you’re in a cult. 😂
Gunther Eagleman™ tweet media
English
140
806
1.7K
20.6K
Marion Cobretti retweetledi
Toni
Toni@ToniLL22·
Democrats will do anything to stay in power. . . 👈😡 For sixty years we were told the goal was simple. Every American, no matter their color, gets one vote and an equal shot at the ballot box. That was the promise of 1965, and it was right. So what happened? Somewhere along the way, the Democratic Party stopped fighting discrimination and started running on it. Race became the product. Keep people angry, keep them afraid, keep them convinced they cannot make it without the party, and you keep their votes locked in cycle after cycle. The latest proof came in Louisiana v. Callais. On April 29, the Supreme Court ruled 6 to 3 that Louisiana's congressional map was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. In plain English, the Court said you cannot carve up a state by skin color to guarantee a political outcome. That is not voter suppression. That is the opposite of it. But listen to the reaction. Hakeem Jeffries and the Congressional Black Caucus ran to the cameras and called it a plot to rig the midterms. They want you to believe black Americans are about to be silenced and erased. It is not true. Nobody is losing the right to vote. Nobody is being turned away at the polls. What is ending is the habit of treating citizens as racial blocs to be herded into safe districts. The vote is untouched. The only thing under threat is a guaranteed seat count drawn by race. The Founders warned about exactly this. In Federalist 57, Madison argued that representatives are chosen by the whole body of the people, not sorted and assigned by a ruling class that decides where each group belongs. That is the real fight. Equal citizenship, or permanent division. The Democrats picked division, because division pays. And now that the Court has said enough, they are not mourning lost rights. They are mourning lost power.
Toni tweet media
English
11
66
81
1.2K
Marion Cobretti
Marion Cobretti@ColWilliamK1970·
@ebonymystique @Quirk22 @Emolclause And your point about red states is a dumb point. If that’s the case, then why aren’t all cities in red states out of control in regard to crime? It’s the Democrat-run cities in the red states that are the issue. Compare Fort Worth to Austin, then get back to me. I’ve got more.
English
0
0
1
29
Yam Grier
Yam Grier@ebonymystique·
@ColWilliamK1970 @Quirk22 @Emolclause Mayors don’t write the penal code, manage the prison system, or set state gun laws - state legislature does. 8 of the top 10 cities with the highest murder rate are in red states. & Chicago isn’t even in the top 10.
English
2
0
0
32
Emoluments Clause
Emoluments Clause@Emolclause·
#BREAKING: Black Alabama protester: “The thing got me the other day was my aunt who participated as a foot soldier…she was in pain and she said…why in the world do they hate us so much? She participated in all those marches and it just sort of hurt my heart to hear her say that at 92 years old.”😢
English
253
1.8K
7.2K
150.1K
Marion Cobretti
Marion Cobretti@ColWilliamK1970·
@ebonymystique @Quirk22 @Emolclause Local leadership matters. Mayors appoint police chiefs, influence prosecution priorities, back bail policies, oversee policing strategy, and shape city culture on law enforcement. You can’t dismiss local governance when discussing crime trends in major cities.
English
0
0
1
20
Marion Cobretti retweetledi
Toni
Toni@ToniLL22·
Liberals don’t want to hear other views but their own. 🔥🔥🔥 William F. Buckley nailed it decades ago, and the line still draws blood today. He said liberals claim they want to hear other views, then act shocked and offended when they find out other views actually exist. Buckley said "liberals," but in 2026 there is no daylight between that mindset and the Democratic Party. They are one and the same now. Watch how it plays out. They tell you they believe in dialogue. They say they want a big tent. They claim the moral high ground on tolerance. Then you tell them you have questions about DEI mandates, or about teaching kids to see everything through race, or about a federal government that grows no matter who is in charge. And the mask drops. You do not get a debate. You get a label. Racist. Bigot. Threat to democracy. The conversation is over before it starts, because in their minds the only reason anyone could disagree is ignorance or hate. Here is what they still cannot accept. In 2024, mainstream America looked at all of it and said no. Not a narrow no. A clear one. And what did they do with that message? Nothing. They did not rethink a single position. They just got louder. Every move gets called a crisis. Every policy gets called the end of the republic. Reasonable people watch the meltdown and wonder if anyone over there is actually listening. That is the tell. A party confident in its ideas argues for them. A party that believes it already knows best just tries to shame you into silence. Buckley saw it coming. The arrogance, the certainty, the genuine surprise that half the country thinks for itself. The country has not stopped thinking for itself. It just stopped asking permission. The only question left is whether the elites running that party will ever notice, or whether they will keep being shocked, right up until the next election reminds them again.
Toni tweet media
English
20
148
186
3.5K
Marion Cobretti retweetledi
Patrick Bet-David
Patrick Bet-David@patrickbetdavid·
There is a lot of noise surrounding the potential US/Iran deal. Here’s what the rumors are so far: - Iran has agreed to give up its stockpile of highly enriched uranium. Iran currently has 400 kg of highly enriched uranium. Enough for 11 nuclear bombs. - The US would begin a phased unfreezing of Iran’s $6b to $30b in cash. - The Strait of Hormuz will open up. - Iran won’t charge a penny for ships to pass through. No $2m toll fee. - The US agrees to relieve some of the sanctions. - War ENDS on all fronts with Lebanon. - US forces near Iran to withdraw. - 30 to 60 days to finalize the nuclear deal. If true, that’s a massive victory for the President. Here are the winners and losers. Winners: 1. American people. Oil prices will likely fall. Shipping insurance costs drop. Inflation pressure eases. 2. The President 3. Global markets. 4. Stock market. 5. Gulf states. Temporary tension eliminated. I have them as both winners and losers. 6. IRGC gains legitimacy. They’re not Venezuela. Whether anyone likes it or not. Including myself. 7. China is a major winner. The Strait of Hormuz hurt them the most. They can spin this to their people that the deal got done after the President left China. 8. Russia relies on Iran being a bit more stable. 9. NATO nations were starting to worry. They were pansies shivering about having to help the US. (They’re also big losers in my eyes) Losers: 1. Iranian people. No one knows what the IRGC will do after this deal to their own people. Their media outlets will say they beat America. That message will 100% be pushed. The Iranian people will be under even more scrutiny by the IRGC. 2. Obama’s administration. This sounds like a much stronger deal than Obama’s administration made. 3. Netanyahu. He wanted regime change or collapse for his legacy, but Trump wasn’t on the same page at the end. 4. NATO was exposed. They showed they don’t have America’s back if shit were to hit the fan. Terrible moment for them. 5. Reza Pahlavi. Another year of not being able to help his people become free. This point will lead to more memes by the RP loyalists but it’s the truth. 6. Gulf states. The IRGC still controls a neighbor capable of firing rockets at surrounding Gulf nations. 7. Iranian proxies and non state actors. Hezbollah, Houthis, and Shia militias will not receive the same funding flow if sanctions are removed under limitations tied to the agreement. 8. Defense contractors and war hawks. They wanted this thing to continue so they could land massive contracts. I’m sure they’re not happy. 9. Oil producers benefiting from high prices. 10. Political extremists on both sides. Those who wanted to see the President lose (woke right) and those pushing for nuclear war. 11. Democrats. They desperately needed this to continue heading into the midterms. They will HATE this deal. Don’t worry, they’ll still find a way to blame Trump. But independents won’t fall for the BS. Democrats and the woke right will follow suit, but not reasonable independents who can see through the nonsense. I predicted this would be done before June 14th. Lots of people pushed back. Obviously, it’s not done yet, and anything can happen, especially when dealing with Iran, but if the President pulls this off, the news outlets, pundits, and influencers will move on to the next issue after they’re done crying nonstop. The greatest 60 days of positive distractions are around the corner. President Trump’s birthday: June 14th US 250 year anniversary: July 4th World Cup: June 11th to July 19th The world will move on, and the President can focus on driving results toward the midterms, Cuba, affordability and other issues. Love him or hate him, he continues to show how fluid his mind is and that he can change his approach depending on whether things do or don’t go his way. Future Looks Bright.
English
3.9K
2.6K
15.7K
1.7M
Marion Cobretti
Marion Cobretti@ColWilliamK1970·
@ebonymystique @Quirk22 @Emolclause America’s most violent cities 2025 — New Orleans (46 homicides/100k), Memphis (41), St. Louis (38), Baltimore (36), DC (36) — have been run by Democrats for decades. Why haven’t Democrat policies fixed this? It’s because they are notoriously soft on crime.
English
1
0
1
43
Marion Cobretti
Marion Cobretti@ColWilliamK1970·
@ebonymystique @Quirk22 @Emolclause Explain cities like Jacksonville, Fort Worth, Miami, and San Diego that also have large metros with lower violent crime rates than many heavily progressive-run cities. Policy matters: policing, prosecution, bail, and enforcement matter, which Democrats are historically soft on.
English
1
0
0
82
Yam Grier
Yam Grier@ebonymystique·
@ColWilliamK1970 @Quirk22 @Emolclause You showed the benefits of democratic leadership and are choosing to ignore them in favor of pointing out that violence happens more in densely populated metropolis’s, which are all democratic, than in less densely populated areas which is common sense
English
1
0
0
29
Marion Cobretti
Marion Cobretti@ColWilliamK1970·
@ebonymystique @Quirk22 @Emolclause You point proves less than it claims: the Harvard study says electing Democratic mayors doesn’t reduce crime, arrests, police staffing, or spending—only the racial share of arrests shifts modestly. That’s not “safer cities.” That’s politics changing enforcement patterns. Duh.
English
0
0
1
20
Yam Grier
Yam Grier@ebonymystique·
@ColWilliamK1970 @Quirk22 @Emolclause your reading comprehension skills are seriously trash. Your screenshot states the goal of democratic policies and the benefits. The cropped out part is what “critics say”. & my link says PARTISANSHIP DOES NOT AFFECT CRIME RATES which means it doesn’t matter what party they’re in
Yam Grier tweet mediaYam Grier tweet media
English
1
0
0
23
Marion Cobretti
Marion Cobretti@ColWilliamK1970·
@ebonymystique @Quirk22 @Emolclause Maybe you’re really slow in comprehending that these are still major problems in Democrat-run cities with black populations. What is gonna be your excuse now? I just showed you the receipt. Why aren’t Democrat policies remedying the problems that still exist many years later?
English
1
0
1
39
Marion Cobretti
Marion Cobretti@ColWilliamK1970·
@ebonymystique @Quirk22 @Emolclause The author is literally implying that when black officers are hired, policing becomes less aggressive, enforcement priorities shift, departments arrest fewer people for certain offenses.
English
0
0
1
17
Yam Grier
Yam Grier@ebonymystique·
@ColWilliamK1970 @Quirk22 @Emolclause You do not have good reading comprehension skills which is why you are not understanding the point of the article. You failed the reading test so we’re done. Enjoy your day.
English
2
0
0
17