Sabitlenmiş Tweet
TLDR: If you think PBBM should be removed, then file impeachment with real evidence. Don’t blame us for not supporting weak, hole-filled accusations. We’re going after the VP first because that’s where we believe the stronger case is. Elections remove bad leaders; impeachment removes those with proven impeachable offenses.
// My Counter Argument //
The difference is simple: you voted PBBM into office, and the proper way to remove his influence of power is through the ballot box in 2028.
Our side cannot and should not move to oust a sitting President unless there are clear, impeachment-worthy offenses. Bad governance, incompetence, or disappointment may be unfortunate, but they are not automatic grounds for impeachment.
That is what elections are for - to remove proven bad leaders. Pero hindi kayo naniwala sa amin ng 2022, now you are forcing us to do your bidding?
Further,
Your problem is that you treat every corruption allegation thrown at PBBM as if it is already enough to remove him from office, then expect us to rally behind evidence that is obviously weak, misaligned, or incomplete.
If you truly believe he should be ousted, then file the case.
Your side has enough allies, enough noise, and enough numbers to initiate impeachment proceedings against the sitting President.
So if your evidence is really:
(1) true,
(2) valid, and
(3) as damning as you claim,
then why has no one filed?
Because the moment that “evidence” is subjected to real scrutiny, it falls apart.
That is the flaw in your logic.
You accuse us of inaction, when in reality we are acting where the evidence is strongest. We believe there is enough credible basis to go after the Vice President, and the legislators we supported clearly believe the same.
Meanwhile, you want us to help remove a duly elected President (THAT YOUR SIDE ELECTED) using affidavits full of holes, stories that do not line up, “18 Marines” theatrics, and claims that collapse the second they are examined beyond social media outrage.
And for what? So the replacement is a Vice President we already have strong evidence against?
Absurd.
This is not a change in principle.
This is called seeing the bigger picture.
We start with the case that has stronger evidence, stronger basis, and a cleaner legal path. Not with noise. Not with fluff. Not with theater disguised as proof.
When there is credible, solid, impeachment-worthy evidence against PBBM, trust this: we will be the first to file.
Until then, spare us the melodrama.
Hindi lahat nadadaan sa ingay. Sa korte at sa Kongreso, ebidensya ang usapan.
Intergalactic Movement Against Disinformation@imadshield
A sudden change in principles is not mere inconsistency, it is broken inside. It reveals the rot within a person. When someone easily abandons what they once stood for, it shows they have no real principles, no self-respect, and no dignity.
English
