CommanderNimwit

909 posts

CommanderNimwit banner
CommanderNimwit

CommanderNimwit

@CommanderNimwit

"you think hitler would fuck one of us for a chocolate bar?" - wardaddy, fury (2014) | alt: @commandernimrod

mars Katılım Eylül 2025
3 Takip Edilen6 Takipçiler
CommanderNimwit
CommanderNimwit@CommanderNimwit·
@Krinderliz @gcc_observer @Rainmaker1973 "If scientist were allowed to prove it there'd be proof." 🔄translating...🔄 "I'm gonna make a dumbass claim and then try to make excuses when I fail to show evidence" P.S. the guy is Arab. If you're gonna be racist then at least know what race you're insulting. Dumbass
English
0
0
0
4
The Bringer Brigz
The Bringer Brigz@Krinderliz·
@CommanderNimwit @gcc_observer @Rainmaker1973 If scientist were allowed to prove it there'd be proof. Just saying I'm wrong without actually proving it, makes what you're saying void. The guy is black, but by single word of his comment is proof. I'm obsessed, remember? I'm a sage on the matter
English
0
0
0
8
Massimo
Massimo@Rainmaker1973·
A bomb squad was checking a suspicious backpack, and this dude got fed up with waiting
English
2.1K
5.1K
70K
12.5M
JJ🕊️
JJ🕊️@jesseyjay94·
@CommanderNimwit @BarackObama @USMNT A democratic socialist is a communist. You can’t rebrand it. Socialism is communism in disguise. Are you that historically illiterate? I wouldn’t expect much else.
English
3
0
3
87
CommanderNimwit
CommanderNimwit@CommanderNimwit·
@Krinderliz @gcc_observer @Rainmaker1973 You have no idea what race that guy is. And you can't prove the claim that "critical thinking has everything to do with race" because it doesn't. Your obsession with race and the need to bring it up in a completely unrelated topic tells me that you're only acting this way--
English
2
0
0
6
CommanderNimwit
CommanderNimwit@CommanderNimwit·
@meteor133642 @ChicagosLoneCon I should also probably make gambling orange instead of red because it'd be kinda hypocritical for me to be more in favor for pornography than gambling when both industries are built off of potentially addictive material/practices.
English
0
0
1
14
Chiraq💸 🇺🇸
Chiraq💸 🇺🇸@ChicagosLoneCon·
Are the following morally acceptable? ⬜️ Abortion ⬜️ Physician-assisted suicide ⬜️ Homosexuality ⬜️ Changing one’s gender ⬜️ Pornography ⬜️ Divorce ⬜️ Birth control ⬜️ Pre-marital sex ⬜️ Polygamy ⬜️ Gambling ⬜️ Death penalty ⬜️ Medical testing on animals ⬜️ Cloning
English
99
6
102
427.2K
CommanderNimwit
CommanderNimwit@CommanderNimwit·
@ConsevativHero @ChicagosLoneCon You're strawmanning my argument, that is not what I said. I value human life and I value animal life respectively. However, it does seem to me that you want to completely disregard animal lives whilst also putting humans on a pedestal and applying completely different standards.
English
1
0
0
6
CommanderNimwit
CommanderNimwit@CommanderNimwit·
@ConsevativHero @ChicagosLoneCon I would rather have a fetus be aborted without ever knowing it even existed in the first place than to have a child grow up in a system that will inevitably end up failing them and leaving them homeless and suffering from countless trauma, yes.
English
0
0
0
2
CommanderNimwit
CommanderNimwit@CommanderNimwit·
@ConsevativHero @ChicagosLoneCon But I do think it's more moral to abort a fetus that doesn't have self awareness capabilities than to experiment on a very much self aware non-human living being with unethical experimentation, simply because the experimentation is "life saving".
English
1
0
0
6
CommanderNimwit
CommanderNimwit@CommanderNimwit·
@ConsevativHero @ChicagosLoneCon Just know that the adoption and foster care system is horribly flawed and congested, which leaves children growing up in a horrible system, so I really wouldn't be talking about adoption unless you're actually capable and willing to adopt a child.
English
2
0
0
6
CommanderNimwit
CommanderNimwit@CommanderNimwit·
@ConsevativHero @ChicagosLoneCon People who are already born? No, because they are fully sentient and capable of feeling pain/stress. A fetus? Yes, if it means complications with the pregnancy or if the mother doesn't have the financial or physical capability to take care of the child.
English
2
0
0
13
CommanderNimwit
CommanderNimwit@CommanderNimwit·
@ConsevativHero @ChicagosLoneCon By fully developed, I am saying that their hearts have stopped developing. The whole point of a heart defect is that there is something wrong with the heart.
English
0
0
0
4
CommanderNimwit
CommanderNimwit@CommanderNimwit·
@ConsevativHero @ChicagosLoneCon Exactly, but if you're willing to inflict that exact same pain and suffering upon other sentient beings simply because of the fact that they aren't human, then what's the point?
English
0
0
0
4
CommanderNimwit
CommanderNimwit@CommanderNimwit·
@ConsevativHero @ChicagosLoneCon The problem with that logic is that people who have heart diseases have already fully developed hearts, only their hearts are defected. Fetuses don't have fully developed hearts until 8-10 weeks.
English
2
0
0
10
Consevativ Hero
Consevativ Hero@ConsevativHero·
@CommanderNimwit @ChicagosLoneCon But is sometimes nessesary for the development of sience to save human life. For example some experiments on HIV infected animals with gene tecnology were nessesary to find a way to cure AIDS
English
1
0
0
62
CommanderNimwit
CommanderNimwit@CommanderNimwit·
@ConsevativHero @ChicagosLoneCon The "heartbeat" in question is nothing but electrical impulses that cause a clump of cells that will eventually become the heart to perform the motions of a heartbeat. At six weeks the heart isn't even close to fully developed.
English
1
0
0
9
CommanderNimwit
CommanderNimwit@CommanderNimwit·
@ConsevativHero @ChicagosLoneCon Any experimentation on animals that involves the animal feeling pain or suffering in any way, shape or form is deeply unethical and should never be performed. Of course, there are experiments that don't hurt the test subject in question, such as the mirror test, that I would--
English
2
0
0
12