CSG

65.7K posts

CSG banner
CSG

CSG

@Common_Sense_G

something, something important, life changing and interesting.

England, United Kngdom Katılım Mart 2017
621 Takip Edilen402 Takipçiler
CSG
CSG@Common_Sense_G·
@darwintojesus Yeah that all beg the question and strawman the position sure. Please if you can what do you reject and why from my argument please.
English
0
0
0
4
Darwin to Jesus
Darwin to Jesus@darwintojesus·
@Common_Sense_G If this is what you actually want to discuss that’s fine that’s just not what you said. You know I’ve written like three articles addressing this very argument right?
English
1
0
0
16
TheRooster
TheRooster@HandsofScars·
@Common_Sense_G @darwintojesus You said it with all the premises. In short God has the power to prevent suffering and enact his will, logically that means an all powerful God must do this all the time. Because if your argument is anything short of that then you agree that God isn't required to intervene.
English
1
0
0
5
TheRooster
TheRooster@HandsofScars·
@Common_Sense_G @darwintojesus Can and has to are two completely different things. I'm only trying to understand your rationale for God having to always intervene just because he is all powerful.
English
1
0
0
6
Thoughtful Confections & Café 🦬
@Common_Sense_G @darwintojesus God is Spirit and has a mind, but I reject your premise. Morality is necessarily rooted in God, but it isn't arbitrary or subjective for us. We aren't equal to God and His purposes and standards exist independently of our own minds. Morality is dependent on God but not us.
English
2
0
0
17
CSG
CSG@Common_Sense_G·
@darwintojesus Lol an impossibility is a contradiction lol
English
1
0
0
18
Darwin to Jesus
Darwin to Jesus@darwintojesus·
Okay so this isn’t actually arguing against God’s nature and showing there’s a contradiction, this is trying to demonstrate that there’s a tension or impossibility between having omniscience and free will. So did you want to actually talk about number three or was this what you meant and you don’t understand that these are different subjects?
English
1
1
2
43
CSG
CSG@Common_Sense_G·
@Davism_Soupism @darwintojesus Not true. People like me and you have different views on where life begins and when personhood starts. You keep pushing this objective standard but saying we agree on a standard does not mate it objective.
English
0
0
0
2
David Soup
David Soup@Davism_Soupism·
@Common_Sense_G @darwintojesus I’ll tell you why it’s BS: you and I both believe that murdering a one or two year-old is evil and would give any mother long lasting regret and nightmares, unless they are a sociopath. Everyone knows the only difference between an unborn baby and born baby is where they reside.
English
1
0
0
5
CSG
CSG@Common_Sense_G·
@ThoughtfulCafe @darwintojesus Why would it state good is objective? It can be analytically objective or true. But anything coming from a mind by definition is subjective. Is your god a mind or has one?
English
1
0
0
10
Thoughtful Confections & Café 🦬
@Common_Sense_G @darwintojesus It's your burden. I honestly don't believe you can coherently define "good" with an authoritative and objective standard that will work for your critique. I also seriously doubt you can support and defend the other assertions.
English
1
0
0
13
David Soup
David Soup@Davism_Soupism·
@Common_Sense_G @darwintojesus “They are better at accepting their child overall and allow for personal growth and expiration of self.” - “go ahead Bobbie, do whatever you want as long as it makes you happy” is not necessarily good parenting. Please, give me more examples. No lol
English
1
0
0
4
David Soup
David Soup@Davism_Soupism·
@Common_Sense_G @darwintojesus If two men would be “just as good”, then men would be able to breast feed, get pregnant, talk to their daughter about menstrual cycles, etc.
English
1
0
0
12
CSG
CSG@Common_Sense_G·
@Davism_Soupism @darwintojesus Pretty much overall yes. They are better at accepting their child overall and allow for personal growth and expiration of self. The vax are safe. We do have less ice and polar bears are out due to habitats changing.
English
3
0
0
17
David Soup
David Soup@Davism_Soupism·
@Common_Sense_G @darwintojesus Oh, so it comes out perfectly even? Lol Please tell me what a gay couple does better than a straight couple. Fair, but remember how the studies showed the vax was 100% safe??? or how Gore’s studies showed we would have significantly less ice and polar bears?
English
1
0
0
17
CSG
CSG@Common_Sense_G·
@Davism_Soupism @darwintojesus Because they can diagnose it and have strict criteria for it, especially for a study. You can literally find out what the clinical definitions are.
English
2
0
0
15
CSG
CSG@Common_Sense_G·
@darwintojesus Sure. Here's a argument i made before.
CSG tweet media
English
2
1
1
79
CSG
CSG@Common_Sense_G·
@Davism_Soupism @darwintojesus Both are just as good. Almost all 2 parent households are similar. Some do somethings slightly better while others do something else better. But all the studies show they are just as good. Also notice I didn't just dismis your source because its a pro life organisation?
English
2
0
0
19
David Soup
David Soup@Davism_Soupism·
@Common_Sense_G @darwintojesus lol a collection of studies collected from Cornell’s public policy dept? This is easy. According to natural law, which parenting couple will be best for children- a couple that has a father and mother, or a gay couple?
English
1
0
0
20