Commentator

106.8K posts

Commentator

Commentator

@Commuternyc

Father of three live in Morris County New Jersey and work in Midtown Manhattan. opinions are my own not investment advice

Long Hill New Jersey Katılım Mart 2009
5K Takip Edilen2K Takipçiler
Occupy Democrats
Occupy Democrats@OccupyDemocrats·
BREAKING: HELL YES! Hawaii's Democratic Governor Joshua Green signs a law to destroy the power of the corrupt Citizens United ruling — reducing corporate influence and dark money donations in his state. This is a blueprint to save our democracy... “Hawaii is taking a brave and bold step to get corporate and dark money out of America’s politics. It will send a powerful message that will be heard loud and clear across the Pacific and across the mainland," said Tom Moore of the Center for American Progress, the organization that helped mastermind this plan. The groundbreaking legislation redefines corporations to ban them from spending on elections or ballot measures and instead restricts them to spending money on lobbying, a far less effective form of influence-buying. Citizens United is often pointed to as the epicenter of our current political nightmare. It holds that corporations as "people" are entitled to spend unlimited money on political issues because such expenditures are supposedly a form of First Amendment-protected free speech. The only real restriction is that they can't donate directly to campaigns, but the proliferation of Super PACs makes that a toothless rule. Thanks to Citizens United, corporations have twisted our government to serve their needs over the needs of the American people. Politicians have bent over backwards to slash regulations and weaken labor power so that they can siphon up more donations from big companies to help them win elections. It's a total inversion of what the Founders envisioned for our country. “If the states are not brave enough to challenge Citizens United and other court rulings at the highest court in the land, those rulings will stand forever. We need states to step forward in order to challenge these rulings," said State Rep. Scot Matayoshi. This could be the start of a deluge of such legislation. Currently, 14 other states have introduced similar bills although none have yet advanced. The time to pass them is now! Please ❤️ and share to demand that your state pass a law like this!
Occupy Democrats tweet media
English
4
43
109
1.8K
Commentator
Commentator@Commuternyc·
Would it be a breach of Fund manager’s fiduciary duty to invest in a company Spacx where the CEO can’t be fired and the FUNd has no voting rights? I think it would be for sure. ) $tsla $tslaq
Alex@alex_avoigt

Tesla - SpaceX Merger Since discussions regarding a potential merger between SpaceX and Tesla show no signs of ending, I would like to offer a brief statement with my thoughts on the matter here. There will be no merger involving a 1:1 valuation ratio between SpaceX and Tesla, as Tesla shareholders would not approve it. Why? Because SpaceX’s major cash flow streams lie in the future, whereas Tesla’s are already in the realization phase. Consequently, we are currently witnessing a rally in Tesla stock—one which, in my opinion, could climb relatively quickly to just about $700 once it breaks past its all-time high (ATH) of $500. Tesla stock represents tangible potential for cash flow, revenue, and profit that is largely situated in the short-to-medium term; SpaceX, conversely, must first build the necessary infrastructure—including in-orbit data centers—before it can realize its substantial profits and that will take time. Tesla shareholders are well aware of this fact and will therefore only consent to a merger if the terms of the exchange ratio reflect this reality. Since Elon is conscious of this, he will be compelled to assign a commensurate premium to Tesla stock—thereby making the merger proposal sufficiently attractive for Tesla shareholders to vote in favor of it. This holds true entirely irrespective of how SpaceX stock is valued or how it performs following its IPO. There are some voices predicting that SpaceX stock will surge immediately after its IPO, only to suffer a sharp subsequent decline; while this scenario may well materialize, it would have no adverse impact on Tesla shareholders. Elon will not proceed with a merger until SpaceX stock has established a solid trading foundation- a prerequisite that may, in and of itself, ensure Tesla shareholders receive a significant premium. Given these underlying conditions, Tesla shareholders stand to benefit in any scenario: both from the SpaceX IPO - thanks to the ensuing hype surrounding Elon’s ventures - and from a potential merger, which is unlikely to take place until 2027. None of us knows what will happen since stock markets, and particularly the price movements of individual stocks, are unpredictable yet I see not enormous risks, but rather opportunities for an increase in Tesla’s share price. $tsla

English
2
1
3
149
Commentator
Commentator@Commuternyc·
@RicochetRowdy Or not buying which may be required given the unusual structure $tslaq
English
1
0
1
13
Ricochet Rowdy
Ricochet Rowdy@RicochetRowdy·
@Commuternyc I do not believe this would be a breach. $meta has a dual-class structure and cannot realistically fire Zuckerberg. However, a fund can "fire" the CEO by selling its shares.
English
1
0
0
35
Commentator
Commentator@Commuternyc·
Would it be a breach of Fund manager’s fiduciary duty to invest in a company Spacx where the CEO can’t be fired and the FUNd has no voting rights? I think it would be for sure. $tsla $tslaq
English
1
1
1
93
Commentator
Commentator@Commuternyc·
Would it be a breach of Fund manager’s fiduciary duty to invest in a company Spacx where the CEO can’t be fired and the FUNd has no voting rights? I think it would be for sure. V3 $tsla $tslaq
Dan O'Dowd@RealDanODowd

Watch @Tesla self-driving v14.3.2 make an illegal right turn from a straight only lane. @NHTSAgov, didn't you recall this safety defect three years ago with FSD Beta?

English
0
0
0
86
Commentator
Commentator@Commuternyc·
@FT Would it be a breach of Fund manager’s fiduciary duty to invest in a company Spacx where the CEO can’t be fired and the FUNd has no voting rights? I think it would be for sure. $tsla $tslaq
English
1
0
0
212
Financial Times
SpaceX is intending to guarantee Elon Musk cannot be fired and offering a trillion-dollar pay deal linked to building a colony on Mars. ft.trib.al/byv6y9T
Financial Times tweet media
English
92
142
1.4K
188.4K
Commentator
Commentator@Commuternyc·
Slowing EV demand Heavy competition from Chinese automakers Regulatory scrutiny of self-driving tech High spending on AI/robotaxis without proven profits yet Recall and quality-control concerns Dependence on Elon Musk’s long-term AI vision $tslaq
English
0
0
1
47
Commentator
Commentator@Commuternyc·
Tesla is increasing spending on AI, robotics, chips, and robotaxis — with planned capital expenditures jumping above $25 billion. Some analysts worry this could pressure cash flow if autonomous-driving profits take longer than expected to materialize negative cash $tsla
English
0
0
0
73
Commentator
Commentator@Commuternyc·
robotics, chips, and robotaxis — with planned capital expenditures jumping above $25 billion. Some analysts worry this could pressure cash flow if autonomous-driving profits take longer than expected to materialize Negative cash flow $tslaq
English
0
0
0
50
Commentator
Commentator@Commuternyc·
Another report noted Tesla’s actual retail sales in China fell 10% year-over-year in April despite headlines suggesting strong wholesale growth. Tesla is not a growth company $tsla
English
0
1
11
216
Commentator
Commentator@Commuternyc·
European regulators are reportedly scrutinizing Tesla’s Full Self-Driving technology more aggressively. Reuters said internal records show skepticism inside EU regulatory bodies over Tesla’s automated-driving safety claims and approval process. IOW Tesla is a fraud of lies $tsla
English
0
4
13
515
Commentator
Commentator@Commuternyc·
lol 😂 Scaling. WTAFJ Reuters reported that Tesla’s robotaxi rollout in Texas is seeing very long wait times and operational friction. That raises concerns about whether Tesla’s autonomous-taxi expansion is scaling as smoothly as investors hoped. $tsla $tslaq
English
0
1
5
252
Commentator retweetledi
Motorhead
Motorhead@BradMunchen·
I've never seen a carmaker spend billions of $$ and years of development time to make a new model that nobody can drive on public roads. $TSLA
Motorhead tweet media
English
26
32
202
6K
Mark Frantz
Mark Frantz@ironted21·
@Commuternyc Number two and number three best selling cars in America Behind only the Ford F150
English
1
0
0
22