Sabitlenmiş Tweet
King Conch 🌎☮️
6.5K posts
King Conch 🌎☮️
@Conchster
Devoted Husband, Grateful Conch, Project Management Veteran, Occasional Pirate and Consummate Entrepreneur... シ $conch 🦚
Pipe Hittin’ USA Katılım Kasım 2012
2K Takip Edilen632 Takipçiler
King Conch 🌎☮️ retweetledi
@sonofsun1984 Who cares - Code is not protocol.
TCP is TCP whether from Linux, M$ or Apple
English
King Conch 🌎☮️ retweetledi
@Dr_CSWright You were not villainized for defending the individual. That's you rationalizing. That's you trying to promoting an image you want people to think is you. That's you wanting to be seen as a hero who has been wrongly treated. It's just an image it's not reality.
English
King Conch 🌎☮️ retweetledi
Think about the inversion for a moment.
I am the one who has been villainised for defending the individual—for insisting that Bitcoin must have a fixed protocol so that no developer, corporation, exchange or foundation can seize control of it.
I put tens of millions of my own family’s money into that fight. I threw everything at building the technology, restoring the protocol and releasing the tools. I dealt with compromised systems, intrusions, litigation and years of organised public hostility.
Then look at what stood against me.
COPA was backed by interests connected to Meta, Jack Dorsey, Coinbase and some of the largest corporate players in the world—organisations collectively representing trillions of dollars in capital and influence.
Yet many of you convinced yourselves that they represented the small individual, while I represented centralised control.
Think about that.
I argued for rules that even I could not change. They defended a system directed by a small group of developers and supported by exchanges, custodians and corporate infrastructure.
I argued that anyone should be able to build, compete and accept payment. They supported restrictions that pushed ordinary users back towards middlemen.
You were told that concentrated corporate power was decentralisation, while the person demanding a protocol beyond anyone’s control was the villain.
If you genuinely care about the small individual, stop repeating the branding and examine the structure of power.
English
King Conch 🌎☮️ retweetledi
@PacArtCollect The programming is ubiquitous!
Nobody goes untouched…
Some maintain their agency better.
English
The saddest thing in life is watching people being brainwashed by governments & corporations.
English
@Citrullin @vamosvigilante We are all programmable…
Some maintain their agency better than others.
Scary abyss or majestic heights alike.
English
@vamosvigilante We can go into the depth of psychology here.
And me saying there is no evil probably won't help.
Even though it is technically speaking correct.
I am just very glad you start to dig down this path.
It's worth exploring, even when the abyss is scary at times.
English
The brainrot in BTC is incredibly deep.
I'm realizing we were literary dealing with retards all along. Retards manipulated by a few evil and clever individuals - like Epstein.
Rafael LaVerde@vamosvigilante
The moment the Epstein files dropped showing that he was behind the hijacking of Bitcoin -centralizing control of BTC, was the moment you should have stopped listening to everyone around this click who ran cover for Epstein's involvement. These same individuals told you to use the coldcard wallet that was "hacked". Rule of thumb: never ever trust anyone or any network associated with Jeffrey Epstein. Incredible that one has to spell these things out...
English
King Conch 🌎☮️ retweetledi
There is a reason the largest corporate players—and trillions of dollars in institutional capital—prefer BTC.
It is not threatening.
BTC does not remove their role. Restricted capacity pushes ordinary users towards exchanges, custodians, ETFs, payment channels and managed services. Instead of allowing everyone to transact directly, it recreates dependence upon the same institutions Bitcoin was designed to route around.
Corporations can accommodate an asset they custody, package, regulate, trade and sell access to. What threatens entrenched power is a fixed, scalable protocol that lets anyone accept payments, create services and compete globally without permission.
They do not fear “digital gold”. They understand gold.
They fear open competition at the edges.
English
@Dr_CSWright Some seen what needed seeing…
Because those who knew had the courage to speak truth🫡
English
Think about what has happened.
You were told that “running your own node” gives you power. But a home node with no hash power creates no blocks, orders no transactions and cannot make anyone else follow its rules. It may verify information for you, but it does not govern the network.
You signal nothing that block producers are required to obey.
That was the bait-and-switch. Through 1984-level Newspeak, dependence was renamed “sovereignty”, restricted capacity became “decentralisation”, and developer control became “consensus”.
Meanwhile, the limits pushed ordinary users away from direct transactions and towards exchanges, custodians, payment channels and other middlemen. You were taught that running powerless software at home made you independent while the economic system became increasingly dependent upon centralised services.
Think about what you bought into.
You defended a system in which developers can alter the rules, intermediaries control access and most users cannot afford to transact directly—then congratulated yourselves for defeating centralisation.
Your node does not make you sovereign when you possess no power to produce blocks, change the economic order or make others recognise your preferred rules. You are merely choosing which system to observe.
You were sold the appearance of control while real control moved elsewhere.
Think about how dependency was marketed to you as freedom—and how willingly you accepted it.
Welcome to BTC.
English
King Conch 🌎☮️ retweetledi
Now think carefully about what that means.
Many of you called me a fraud for arguing that Bitcoin should remain an open system with a fixed protocol—one in which anyone can transact, build, compete and accept payment without seeking permission.
At the same time, you yelled in defence of a system where a small group of developers can restrict capacity, alter rules, exclude dissenters and determine the direction everyone else must follow.
You called fixed rules “centralised” while demanding rule by committee.
You called unrestricted competition dangerous while defending artificial limits that force users back through exchanges, custodians and other middlemen.
You called me controlling for arguing that nobody—not developers, miners, corporations, foundations or even me—should control the protocol.
That is the contradiction.
Bitcoin was never supposed to depend upon trusting the correct developers. It was designed to remove that power entirely. The rules are fixed; everyone competes above them.
If you opposed me because I wanted an open protocol that no individual could change, ask yourself what you were actually defending—and who truly benefited from it.
Dr Craig S Wright@Dr_CSWright
Imagine thinking Bitcoin was supposed to be governed by a small group of developers who can change the rules, isolate dissenters and gradually degrade the protocol—then calling that decentralisation. Bitcoin was designed to be the opposite. The protocol should be fixed so that no developer, miner, exchange, foundation or corporation can rewrite the rules for its own benefit. Businesses should compete under the same stable conditions, without needing permission from a committee or fearing that their investment will be undermined by the next fashionable “upgrade”. That is what makes the system fair. With a fixed protocol, control moves to the edges. Anyone can build. Anyone can create a service. Anyone can accept payment. Anyone can develop a competing implementation or business model. No central organisation decides who may participate, what applications are acceptable or whose transactions deserve access. The base rules remain stable while competition above them remains unlimited. Changing the protocol is not innovation. Innovation is building better products without forcing everyone else to accept your preferred rules. Bitcoin decentralises power by preventing anyone—including me—from controlling the protocol. That is the point: fixed rules, open access and unrestricted competition at the edges.
English
King Conch 🌎☮️ retweetledi
Bitcoin should not be governed by developers, exchanges, committees, foundations, miners or social-media factions. Governance means the power to change the rules—and whoever can change the rules ultimately controls everyone who depends upon them.
Consensus is not governance. Proof of work does not give miners the right to redesign Bitcoin. It allows competing processors to order transactions under a fixed set of rules. An honest node is not one that votes correctly; it is one that follows the protocol.
That distinction matters.
BTC has become centred on artificial scarcity, restricted capacity, political upgrades and layers of custodians. That is not what Bitcoin was designed to be. Bitcoin should be peer-to-peer electronic cash: a stable commodity protocol that businesses and individuals can integrate without seeking permission or wondering whether tomorrow’s committee will change the economics.
The base rules should be fixed. Software implementations may improve. Hardware may improve. Applications, overlays, payment systems and business models should compete relentlessly—but the foundation must remain stable.
True decentralisation does not mean every individual runs an expensive server. It means open entry, replaceable service providers and the ability to transact without compulsory gatekeepers. Miners process transactions. Users retain their transactions and proofs. Developers build at the edges. No central group governs the system.
Bitcoin should scale so widely, and become so inexpensive, that people use it without thinking about “blockchain”. It should disappear into ordinary commerce: payments, invoices, identity, contracts, property, tickets, records and machine-to-machine exchange.
Bitcoin is not a speculative club governed by whoever controls the repository, ticker or narrative. It is fixed infrastructure for direct economic exchange.
If the protocol can be politically rewritten, it is governed.
If the rules are fixed and everyone competes above them, it is Bitcoin.
English
King Conch 🌎☮️ retweetledi
@lopp It turned out your home nodes had nothing to do with it
English
Happy UASF day!
Nearly a decade has passed.
BCH now trades at 0.33% of the real Bitcoin.
x.com/lopp/status/10…
Jameson Lopp@lopp
Today Bitcoiners celebrate their independence from miner governance via UASF while Bcashers celebrate their independence from Bitcoin via miner governance. The unfortunate truth is that BCH will never be fully independent of BTC as long as it's trying to become Bitcoin.
English
@bsvsimp They took the time to split the coins?
Seems odd in the middle of a heist!
My money is on a marketing stunt😏
English
