Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Conrad deWolf
5K posts

Conrad deWolf
@ConraddeWolf
Husband. Dad. Son. Brother. F/T Investor. Trader. Business Owner. Breeding Registered Brangus Seedstock. Be good to others it comes around. My opinions only.
Somewhere in Texas Katılım Kasım 2013
518 Takip Edilen508 Takipçiler
Conrad deWolf retweetledi

I do not want to raise tamed boys. I want to raise moral boys. There is a difference. To mother boys is to be one of the first voices that tells them what their strength is for, and so I must learn.
Every mother of sons faces a difficult decision:
Do I shape them to fit the world as it is, or do I raise them to reshape the world as it ought to be?
There is a wildness in boys that is not a flaw of creation but a part of it. A gift given by God Himself. A desire to run, to chase, to build, to break, to defend, to explore the unknown and come home covered in dust as if they had conquered the world.
If we kill their spirits for the sake of convenience, for quiet classrooms and tidy living rooms, we may win temporary peace, but the cost is at the expense of a future man. And this truth is prevalent all around us.

English
Conrad deWolf retweetledi

There's a physicist at Stanford named Safi Bahcall who modeled this exact principle and the math is wild.
He calls it "phase transitions in human networks." When you're stationary, your probability of a lucky event is limited to your existing surface area: the people you already know, the places you already go, the ideas you've already been exposed to. Your opportunity window is fixed.
When you move, your collision rate with new nodes in a network increases nonlinearly. Double your movement (new conversations, new cities, new projects) and your probability of a serendipitous encounter doesn't double. It roughly quadruples. Because each new node connects you to their entire network, not just to them.
Richard Wiseman ran a 10-year study at the University of Hertfordshire tracking self-described "lucky" and "unlucky" people. The single biggest differentiator wasn't IQ, education, or family money. Lucky people scored significantly higher on one trait: openness to experience. They talked to strangers more, varied their routines more, and said yes to invitations at nearly twice the rate.
The "unlucky" group followed the same routes, ate at the same restaurants, and talked to the same 5 people. Their networks were closed loops. No new inputs, no new collisions.
Luck isn't random. Luck is surface area. And surface area is a function of movement.
The lobster emoji is doing more work than most people realize. Lobsters grow by shedding their shell when it gets too tight. The growth requires a period of total vulnerability. No protection, no armor, soft body exposed to the ocean.
That's the cost of movement nobody posts about. You have to be uncomfortable first. The new shell only hardens after you've already moved.
ຸ@D9vidson
a moving man will meet his luck 🥀
English

@Tanyaelisabeth Try staying home to raise your kids as their father.
English

If I stay home and raise my own children I am a loser and not ambitious
But if I hire and pay another woman to raise and take care of my children for me than I am an empowered woman
If that same woman stayed home with her children she would be a loser
But if she takes care of my children she is not
If we both switched and raised each others children for a paycheck we would be successful ambitious girl bosses
But if we do it for our own children we are losers
English

Terrible trigger happy close here but another $110. Classic vcp/triangle breakout. An ounce of pause on the exit would’ve printed a few hundred more. #futures $nq

English
Conrad deWolf retweetledi

Why do you want to have children?
This is the best answer.
Someday in your thirties or forties,
you will suddenly realize
the best things in life
have already happened.
The rest is just repetition and growing old,
year after year, day after day.
But a child washes away the repetition,
making life unknown once again.
They cause you worry, make you care,
bring you joy, bring you surprise,
and let you experience childhood all over again.
They make you understand your parents' state of mind from back then,
give you an excuse to buy the toys you once yearned for but couldn't have,
make you strong in pain, and calm in a crisis.
They let you see your childhood self,
so that you can better understand and accept yourself.
Parents raise the child,
and the child also accompanies the parents.
Parents and children nourish each other,
and fulfill each other.
In the fleeting time,
the child gives us something to look forward to in the future.
I think, this is the reason for having children.
Why do you want to have children?
Leave your comment below.
English

@NewRightPoast Imagine seeing this and believing there is no Creator.
“It’s all random”
Yeah, ok.
English

I was so annoyed by this tweet that I spent the last week writing an entire children's book called The Insignificant Speck, which starts out telling this Reddit Atheist story ("You're just a speck, you're not special, nothing means anything"), but then takes a left turn halfway through, exploring the mathematical impossibility of life, how miraculous it is that anything exists at all, how an infinite sequence of stuff had to happen to produce you, how you are imbued with all of that magic, how the human experience is ablaze with the majesty and wonder of its Creator, and how your life has cosmic importance and is weighted with tremendous moral responsibility, and you owe your ancestors and your progeny the honor of living well and fully.
It's the children's picture book I want my kids to read more than any other. A based "Oh, the Places You'll Go" for our retarded age.
Anyone know any illustrators who'd want to collaborate on this?
Gurwinder@G_S_Bhogal
A nice reminder that everything you're worried about is ultimately insignificant.
English
Conrad deWolf retweetledi

Nobody talks about the part between quitting your job and actually making it as a Trader. I lived it.
Waking up every morning knowing there's no paycheck coming. No boss to blame. Just me, my charts, and a family counting on me to figure it out.
I spent 3 years watching other traders post wins while I was journaling losses and trying to understand why I kept breaking my own rules.
The hardest part wasn't losing $13,000 in a day. It was sitting down the next morning and choosing to trade smaller, follow the plan, and trust a process that hadn't paid off yet.
Previous job gave me $10-12K a month and took my whole life. Trading gives me my whole life back, but only after it took everything I thought I knew about myself. If you're having trouble trading right now, still breaking rules, still frustrated, still wondering if this is even going to work.
The only difference between then and now is I stopped trying to be great and started trying to be consistent.
English
Conrad deWolf retweetledi


You can be pretty confident that someone doesn’t read when they say “raped over at Kohl’s” rather than “raked over the coals.” As literacy declines, we are seeing new & unparalleled malapropisms.
hair of the pawg@haleyvemealone
My fav malapropism
English

@CardilloSamuel We’ll never stop finding new ways to kill eachother 😂
English
Conrad deWolf retweetledi

Let me explain exactly why every new subdivision in America looks like the top photo, because the math is wild.
A mature tree increases a home's value by 7 to 19 percent. On a $400,000 house, that's $28,000 to $76,000. A single shade tree produces the cooling equivalent of ten room-size air conditioners running 20 hours a day. One tree on the west side of a house cuts energy bills by 12 percent within 15 years. The bottom photo is worth more, costs less to live in, and sells faster. This has been documented by the University of Washington, Clemson, Michigan State, and the USDA. The data is not in dispute.
Removing those trees saves the builder roughly $5,000 per lot. Concrete trucks need twice the dripline radius of every standing tree. Utility trenches need flat ground. A bulldozer flattens 200 lots in an afternoon. Preserving trees adds weeks and thousands per home.
So the developer pockets $5,000 in savings and the buyer eats $50,000 in lost value for the next two decades. The person making the decision and the person paying for it have never been in the same room.
The Woodlands, Texas is the proof of what happens when they are. George Mitchell bought 28,000 acres of Houston timberland in 1974 and preserved 28% as permanent green space. He forced McDonald's to build behind the tree canopy. That McDonald's became one of the highest-volume locations in Texas. The first office building, designed to reflect the surrounding forest so you couldn't see it from the street, leased completely.
The Woodlands median home price today: $615,000. Katy, a comparable Houston suburb that clear-cut: $375,000. Named #1 community to live in America two years running.
Fifty years of data. The trees are worth more than removing them saves. Developers clear-cut anyway because they sell the house once and leave. You live in it for 30 years.
bitfloorsghost@bitfloorsghost
we ruined such a good thing
English

@frogNscorpion @grok summarize and give a fact based dissection of claims made
English

STUDY DUMP PART 1: Use the wayback machine to view scrubbed articles and SciHub to bypass paywalls.
◼️ Four times more likely to beat their wives than ◻️ men.
>sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
English

@CoachAGochis I’ll vote for you just don’t sell us out like all the rest.
English

For those keeping score at home:
Texas has the most data centers being built in the country
The third most mosques
The eighth highest tax burden (only red state in the top 10)
40th in education
Top 10 highest property taxes
Top 5 H1B imports
Care to comment @GregAbbott_TX
English







