Kimberly Morin

291.5K posts

Kimberly Morin banner
Kimberly Morin

Kimberly Morin

@Conservativeind

Writer: https://t.co/DYrYY6PUoc and weekly guest on nationally syndicated https://t.co/HoL3qVGcz3 w/ Joe Messina. #2A #NHPolitics

New Hampshire Katılım Temmuz 2009
7.5K Takip Edilen33.2K Takipçiler
Kimberly Morin
Kimberly Morin@Conservativeind·
@Liathetrader You'd save money if you got off your ass and went to the store yourself. Delivery prices are inflated.
English
0
2
50
554
Lia the Trader 👸💸
Lia the Trader 👸💸@Liathetrader·
Groceries for 2 people. Will last us maybe 5 days. I don’t know how people do it. This country is becoming unbearably expensive. 2k monthly groceries Not counting if you want to go to a restaurant once a week, add another 1k.
Lia the Trader 👸💸 tweet media
English
3.9K
166
2.1K
2.1M
Kimberly Morin
Kimberly Morin@Conservativeind·
The Virginia Supreme Court answered this question on pages 7–9 of its opinion (linked below). Under Virginia Supreme Court precedent from 1912, Virginia courts cannot review laws until after the laws are finalized, which in this case was AFTER the referendum. vacourts.gov/static/opinion…
English
1
0
1
11
Cory Emberson ن ✝️
Cory Emberson ن ✝️@pursueliberty·
@Conservativeind @ChrisVanHollen Serious question: If the constitutionality of the session was even in question, why would the vote be allowed to proceed? Why wait until the voters went to the polls and the measure was passed?
English
2
0
1
47
Senator Chris Van Hollen
Senator Chris Van Hollen@ChrisVanHollen·
Unlike Texas, North Carolina, Tennessee, Missouri, & Florida, Virginia put its redistricting referendum up to the will of the PEOPLE. They voted & the redistricting amendment won, fair & square.

This ruling throws out their votes and ignores Virginians’ will.  axios.com/local/richmond…
Senator Chris Van Hollen tweet media
English
855
196
583
35K
Kimberly Morin
Kimberly Morin@Conservativeind·
The Virginia Supreme Court answered this question on pages 7–9 of its opinion (linked below). Under Virginia Supreme Court precedent from 1912, Virginia courts cannot review laws until after the laws are finalized, which in this case was AFTER the referendum. vacourts.gov/static/opinion…
English
0
0
0
16
Go Gators!
Go Gators!@pdizzlefoshiz·
@pursueliberty @Conservativeind @ChrisVanHollen Because the AG specifically asked them to wait till after the vote for judgement, and then after the vote argued they couldn’t make a judgement because it was already voted on. The judgement was written by one of the democrat appointed judges so it was a bi partisan judgement
English
2
0
1
14
Kimberly Morin
Kimberly Morin@Conservativeind·
@nottodaybasil LOL... oh yeah. I don't eat there. I've seen him only ever at gun control rallies and anti-Trump rallies. Maybe a Planned Parenthood rally. Truly pathetic
English
0
0
0
14
Justin J. Pearson
Justin J. Pearson@Justinjpearson·
What happened in the State of Tennessee was the largest and swiftest disenfranchisement of Black people that we've seen in at least a century. It's on all of us to organize, mobilize, and participate in bigger numbers than their maps account for.
English
10.4K
6.6K
20.6K
789.7K
Kimberly Morin retweetledi
The Rational Animal 🤔
The Rational Animal 🤔@theobjectivist·
Let me get this straight. Virginia voters created an independent redistricting commission in 2020 specifically to end partisan gerrymandering. Democrats then bypassed their own commission, rushed a constitutional amendment through while over a million people had already voted, and tried to turn a 6-5 seat advantage into 10-1. Obama backed it. Jeffries campaigned for it multiple times. House Majority PAC spent $38 million on it. The Virginia Supreme Court ruled the process violated the state constitution. Now Jeffries calls it "unprecedented and undemocratic" when a court enforces the constitution against his party. He calls it "voter suppression" when Democrats are stopped from suppressing five Republican districts into one. And he invokes Jim Crow to describe a ruling that upheld the very redistricting reform Virginia voters chose in 2020. You did not lose your voice. You lost your gerrymander. There is a difference. And the fact that you cannot tell the difference is exactly why you should not be drawing maps.
Hakeem Jeffries@RepJeffries

The decision by the Virginia Supreme Court to overturn the will of more than three million voters will not stand.

English
274
3.1K
12.2K
471K
Kimberly Morin
Kimberly Morin@Conservativeind·
@RachelBitecofer No they aren't. Their beloved district was represented by AN OLD WHITE MAN FFS. You propagandists are truly disgusting.
Kimberly Morin tweet media
English
2
4
100
1.4K
Kimberly Morin
Kimberly Morin@Conservativeind·
The Virginia Supreme Court answered this question on pages 7–9 of its opinion (linked below). Under Virginia Supreme Court precedent from 1912, Virginia courts cannot review laws until after the laws are finalized, which in this case was AFTER the referendum. vacourts.gov/static/opinion…
English
0
0
2
23
NJ McG
NJ McG@NancyDoleMcGuig·
@Conservativeind @ChrisVanHollen Again.. If you knew anything about the VA Constitution (which you don’t) and VA_SCOTUS (which you don’t) you would know they gave approval for the election to happen.. Copy and paste doesn’t count for real k knowledge.. bless your heart for trying.
English
2
2
2
20