Clifford Richardson

5.2K posts

Clifford Richardson banner
Clifford Richardson

Clifford Richardson

@CorvusCrypto

exabyte scale data strategy by day job. safety critical aviation/marine systems by passion. Not involved in crypto; short for Corvus cryptoleucus :D

Stockholm, Sweden Katılım Eylül 2013
71 Takip Edilen336 Takipçiler
Wylfċen
Wylfċen@wylfcen·
Reminder that this is what Thor authentically looks like↓ This is a stone carving of him from Viking-age Sweden.
Wylfċen tweet media
English
95
371
7.7K
156.8K
Clifford Richardson
Clifford Richardson@CorvusCrypto·
I think people are naturally on edge. There's also a lot of "pull weight" comments, but idk, these things tend to be a lot more complicated than anyone tries to make it seem. Ignoring the whole Gripen vs F35 debate, there are plenty of other systems where the US and Sweden for example have had a lot of collaboration to introduce tech that supplements and enhances the capabilities of even US hardware (specifically Sweden has been excellent at ECM hardware supply to allies). I can't speak to other countries because I don't know, but I do know that there are a lot of defense systems we manufacture here, but I believe the focus had never really been against ballistic systems precisely because the agreements split some areas of expertise and we could just rely on US systems being deployed as per agreements. I just don't think despite people wanting this to be black and white that it is and certainly many people involved in defense at higher levels are more level headed and do think longer than just a few months or years
English
0
0
1
64
KC-10 Driver ✈️ 👨‍✈️ B-737 Wrangler
Calm down. The U.S. has missile intercept systems at a couple points in Europe, like Romania & Poland, as well as ships in the Mediterranean with the capability. But as long as we’re talking…if you guys want to get serious & build a system, we’d appreciate it.
Piers Morgan@piersmorgan

So not only has Iran brazenly lied about its ballistic missile range capacity, but this means it can probably hit the UK with them - and we have zero, I repeat ZERO, defence against these missiles. Very worrying.

English
52
57
866
35.9K
Clifford Richardson
Clifford Richardson@CorvusCrypto·
@QuanquanGu Ironically this proves we are pretty much likely to be in a simulation ourself. Can't wait for that existential dread
English
0
0
0
115
Clifford Richardson
Clifford Richardson@CorvusCrypto·
@flightradar24 Note that ground speeds tend to be higher on both takeoff and landing at high DA airports like Denver.
English
1
0
6
3.1K
Clifford Richardson
Clifford Richardson@CorvusCrypto·
@vanessajossi Nah it's covered in the xc training along with diverting because your CFI wanted to stop at Raisin Cane's at an airport about 20 min.away
English
0
0
1
56
Vanessa
Vanessa@vanessajossi·
A problem that they don't prepare you for in PPL training is when the wind on the day has changed and someone's got the aircraft booked after you, so now the flight is cutting into you toilet & snacky turnaround time
English
5
1
33
2.2K
Paul Gibb
Paul Gibb@PaulGibb18·
@MCCCANM It's a dumb format/system that needed to be overhauled 30+ years ago.
English
1
0
2
15
Clifford Richardson
Clifford Richardson@CorvusCrypto·
@GB_Drone @Xaraphim If you're interested look up some of Prandtls work and NASAs. The term you're looking for is box wings. Definitely not just some random amateur draw up
English
0
0
0
13
Gooney Bird Drone
Gooney Bird Drone@GB_Drone·
@Xaraphim It's a .. [checks notes] .. BIPLANE. Only amateurs and applied aero flunkies fall for this shit.
English
2
0
9
914
Phoenix𝕏
Phoenix𝕏@Xaraphim·
incredible things are happening
Phoenix𝕏 tweet media
English
62
226
4.4K
187.2K
Clifford Richardson
Clifford Richardson@CorvusCrypto·
@officialetienne @Xaraphim Open wings make the air spill over the tip of the wing. By spilling over the air spirals and creates more drag on the wing. Looped (boxed) wings reduce this effect since there is no wing tip for the air to "spill" over. Not a new design just very hard to build and stabilize
English
0
0
0
13
Eti
Eti@officialetienne·
@Xaraphim not an engineer, can someone explain how this reduces drag? my layman’s brain is “but it’s more stuff there”
English
1
0
1
462
Clifford Richardson
Clifford Richardson@CorvusCrypto·
@PIC_Colleen Also the folks at SNA were generally amazing. So we're the chaps that ran LAXs class B mini route transition
English
0
0
0
17
Clifford Richardson
Clifford Richardson@CorvusCrypto·
@PIC_Colleen Favorite and least favorite. Favorite were the folks at Camarillo (CMA) and least favorite was an older naval controller working point mugu approach who always required the weirdest made up procedures to confirm stupid things like that he has me radar contact. Roger ain't enough?
English
1
0
2
222
Colleen Loustalot ✈️
Colleen Loustalot ✈️@PIC_Colleen·
I think everyone has favorite controllers. I know I do. There’s this one gentleman who works Miami approach and departure. Very recognizable voice. Very clear enunciation. Always wanting to help you with vectors. Always wishes you a good day. I don’t know who you are sir, but I always feel happy when I hear you working. ⭐️
Colleen Loustalot ✈️ tweet media
English
23
13
255
6K
Clifford Richardson
Clifford Richardson@CorvusCrypto·
One thing I always appreciated with the FAA is pragmatism. I mean the fact they allow contact approaches to be a thing is such an empowering thing. Sure it's rare that it's useful but it is definitely a tool worth having when used properly
English
0
0
0
19
Clifford Richardson
Clifford Richardson@CorvusCrypto·
Just blip the sides with some primer after the body dries and we'll be good to goooooo
English
0
0
0
14
Clifford Richardson
Clifford Richardson@CorvusCrypto·
@GonZoFreak_ This is a world i had no idea that existed. You can just buy entire MCP and FMS mockups now? Lmao what! That's awesome
English
0
0
0
75
Gonzo
Gonzo@GonZoFreak_·
I admit that I’m a plane nerd…
Gonzo tweet media
English
61
37
863
27.5K
Clifford Richardson
Clifford Richardson@CorvusCrypto·
now that said there are tradeoffs. Bandwidth being one of them. So yknow... not like you should treat everything as a safety-critical subsystem :D
English
0
0
0
11
Clifford Richardson
Clifford Richardson@CorvusCrypto·
"Avionics is hard." Not really. You just make all allocations static, and all timing windows fixed and move on. It's our own fault in other industries making things hard with reliance on dynamic behaviors :P
English
1
0
0
34
Clifford Richardson
Clifford Richardson@CorvusCrypto·
@MingtaKaivo @tunguz nah this is just his shtick. He's XGB-maxxing. He knows just like any reasonable person where the boundary of gradient boosting or decision tree use ends :P
English
0
0
0
5
Mingta Kaivo 明塔 开沃
@tunguz depends what you're inferring. a full transformer for classification or sentiment is overkill. for next-token generation with multi-hop reasoning, there's nothing smaller that holds. the problem is people deploy one architecture at everything.
English
2
0
2
150
Bojan Tunguz
Bojan Tunguz@tunguz·
Neural nets are an overkill. Especially for inference.
English
6
1
42
4.7K
Clifford Richardson
Clifford Richardson@CorvusCrypto·
We really need to dial down the sensationalism before we have official information. ADS-B data is often not as accurate as you think it is and it is NOT radar data. Go Arounds due to obstruction or danger happens more than you think, but you don't hear about all the times people successfully execute go arounds at smaller class C airports because it's not as widely monitored by hobbyists. Wait for more info, get the facts, then evaluate what went wrong (if anything, remember that a go around call like this is a normal part of handling air traffic if separation cannot be guaranteed)
Breaking Aviation News & Videos@aviationbrk

An Alaska Airlines 737 and a FedEx 777 nearly collided as they attempted to land on intersecting runways at Newark Liberty International Airport in New Jersey, according to radar data. The incident happened around 8:17 p.m. Tuesday as the Alaska flight arrived from Portland, Oregon, and the FedEx plane arrived from Memphis, Tennessee. Air traffic control told the Alaska plane to go around seconds before it touched down while the plane was just 150 feet in the air, according to air traffic control audio. Meanwhile, the FedEx plane continued its landing on the intersecting runway. Preliminary data from Flightradar24 shows the Alaska plane cleared the FedEx plane by just 300 to 325 feet. The Federal Aviation Administration said, "An air traffic controller instructed Alaska Airlines Flight 294 to perform a go-around at Newark International Airport because FedEx Flight 721 was cleared for the final approach to an intersecting runway. The FAA is investigating."

English
0
1
0
87