Sabitlenmiş Tweet

So This is something that should be understood more: there has been a larger push to make CICs (Controllers in Command) standalone across the US. There was even some screenshots floating around of pi charts that would show red for any CICs that also worked a position. Midnight shifts or other low traffic times have often been staffed by two people in a cab. However also historically you'd have the CIC working some positions. Now this had its own caveats but one thing that certified controllers (CPCs) were torn about was the idea of keeping two on roster for a shift but essentially only having one control combined positions.
Many thought it could lead to disaster eventuay and while it's easy to point at this ofc we need to wait for all the potential factors to be reviewed and assessed. What I instead want to clarify is this is something that was intended and is directed from higher levels of air traffic management. Now policy shifts slowly so it's not like the trump admin was the one that initially floated the idea and a lot of this is in the general theme of doing more with less that really has been the case since even as far back as Reagan. Still it's worth noting that such decisions like this can be undone by a single secretary on their authority.
So why does Duffy not do that and fix this? the caveat is they really don't have enough people to make each shift three people (2 CPCs on position and an OS as CIC). There are some pushes to get more staff but it's complicated by the fact that the OKC academy is the single bottleneck for training. They tried to add more academies but it's been shut down in Congress (needs congress approval and OK congressmen won't want to relinquish a big benefit to them even if it makes things safer long term because jobs losses).
This is a complicated issue and is not one sided but since people are talking more on the control side i want this to get more attention to get real meaningful fixes that CPCs are comfortable with. Yes they have a union, no that union is not helpful atm and Nick Daniels has shown them to be completely impotent in leadership ability against the current challenges.
To preempt what normally comes up: yes i live in Sweden, but I'm American and have had strong ties to aviation through friends and being a licensed FAA pilot that also understands the air traffic side and listens to the controllers impacted by these issues. I don't try to talk out of my ass and instead just listen to the actual controllers working the job. We need to listen to the controllers more. They are the real data points not a shitty pie chart pushing for more standalone CICs (or CICs that just work CD). Staffing issues are not new. Duffy is absolutely inheriting the issues that really have been ramping up since the late 80s but he's the one with the role. As we say elsewhere: comes with the title, he can fix things.
English













