Lex et Scientia
57.7K posts

Lex et Scientia
@lexetscientia
Moral & political philosopher, lawyer, evolutionary biology, history, epistemology, CFB handicapping























Tucker is basically parroting John Mearsheimer who said that the Middle East would be more stable if I ran had a nuclear weapon because then Israel would not attack them. My response is that having a nuclear weapon does not deter the Muslim states from attacking Israel. Part of this is because they believe in murdered them. Everybody in the world agrees our Ranch should not have a nuclear weapon up until this year. Most Democrats and Republicans are merely arguing over how close Iran was to actually getting nuclear weapons. But that also misses the point ballistic missiles are extremely devastating and Iran had a mountain full of ballistic missiles and has not hesitated to use cluster bombs on civilian centers this year via ballistic missiles. Cluster bombs are a violation of the Geneva convention. I believe that we have miscalculated the messaging here. Yes it would be extremely bad for Iran to have a nuclear weapon, but it’s already bad for them to even have ballistic weapons. They should not be allowed to have anything of the sort, not drones not ballistic missiles, not nuclear weapons, not a navy, and not an army.





L.A. is safer than it's been in decades, but crime is an issue dominating the mayor's race latimes.com/california/sto…










