ᛤ Crazy Crypto Meow ᛤ

4 years ago I lived in a bush and hunted for my meals. Now I have 2 passive incomes, my own house, & a personal chef. Follow for financial advice. #crypto #Hodl

Karpathy just outlined the next era of AI. all over 66 minutes… I broke down his 10 major takeaways so you don’t have to watch the full video (but you still probably should after reading this) here’s what he said matters most…. → “I don’t think I’ve typed a line of code since December.” the default workflow for software engineers has changed permanently since late 2025. we don’t write code anymore. we express intent to persistent AI agents for 16+ hours a day → he coined “AI psychosis”… the anxiety of knowing you have unused tokens just sitting there. success isn’t measured in your flops anymore. it’s measured in your token throughput → the limits aren’t model capability anymore. they’re orchestration skill. the people who know how to direct agents are operating 10x above everyone else using the same tools let me walk through all of his points… 1. mastery looks different now Karpathy built a personal agent called “Dobby” that controls his entire home through natural language. persistence + memory + parallel agents = a 2 person team operating like a 20 person org 2. software becomes disposable humans don’t need custom apps anymore. the customer is no longer the human… it’s agents acting on behalf of humans. entire industries have to account for and refactor for this 3. AutoResearch changes everything his side project (github .com/karpathy/autoresearch)… fully autonomous research loops. agents edit code, train models, and iterate overnight while you sleep. human only writes the high level goal 4. the skills that matter now understand that an agent can be both a brilliant PhD level systems programmer and a 10 year old’s unformed mind in the same conversation. and your job is to overcome those challenges and direct your agents. everything else they’ll soon do better 5. specialized models > one giant brain stop trying to build one know it all mega brain model. the future looks like an ecosystem… diverse adaptable and specialized models built for specific jobs. a team of focused models beats one mega model every time 6. distributed research could disrupt the lab monopoly imagine thousands of smartphones and computers around the world running AI experiments at the same time… not owned by one company. results are easy to verify but hard to discover. it’s how open collaboration could disrupt big closed labs decentralized internet 7. jobs data says something completely different than the narrative Karpathy looked at all the real data. engineering job demand is still rising. cheaper engineering creates MORE demand, not less. like how ATMs actually created more bank teller jobs 8. open source is the safety net open models generally lag frontier by 6-8 months but they’re also essential. closed models carry systemic risk from over-centralization. Karpathy wants ensembles of minds, not 2-3 labs behind closed doors making decisions for everyone 9. robotics will lag badly the physical world is messy and capital intensive. digital transformation will be orders of magnitude faster. future prediction… most AI agents will pay humans to act as their hands and eyes in the physical world, creating information markets for real world data to sell between themselves 10. education gets rebuilt from scratch the core LLM training algorithm fits in about 200 lines of Python. the rest is bloat. the new model? humans explain concepts to agents once, agents tutor humans infinitely and personally. write documentation for agents first. yes, a markdown first file world his one liner that hits hardest for me… “I put in just very few tokens… and a huge amount of stuff happens on my behalf” we’re in the era of autonomous agents. humans become directors, not doers. the leverage is insane, but it’s only really available to people who learn how to use it properly if you’re building with AI now, this is required listening material imo the ones who move first? they don’t ask permission they just do it: master AI

@mgrabina If you detect a swap where the user could lose ~10% of value, don’t just show a small text ⚠️ Add a clear warning and a big caption. ⚠️ Require the user to type “CONFIRM” before proceeding. When real value can be lost, safeguards should be explicit, not hidden in small UI hints

After today's unfavourable $50M swap on our interface, there's a lot of confusion around slippage I'd like to clarify: Slippage is the tolerance buffer on a market order: how much the final fill price can deviate from the quoted price due to market movement between signing and execution. On the Aave interface, suggested slippage is algorithmically calculated from asset pair volatility and order size. Since we offer both market orders (with adjustable slippage) and limit orders, our slippage and fee estimates are tuned for execution time. Users can always tighten it (or set limit amounts) and will typically get a surplus back thanks to @CoWSwap's auction mechanism. In this case, the user sent a market order with the suggested 1.21% slippage. But the core issue wasn't slippage, it was just the accepted quote with 99% price impact: As you can confirm it yourself on the CoW explorer, the order includes a quote field showing the original rate (50M USDT -> <140 AAVE) presented to the user before fees and slippage. It was already a very bad rate. All the interactions were also verified via internal analytics, and the user even received a 0.7% surplus, confirming the swap mechanics worked exactly as intended. Thanks to our open-source nature, anyone can reproduce this. So, the price impact warning was displayed. The checkbox was checked, sadly. While we're working on stronger guardrails for all our users, we'll always believe in permissionless DeFi.

JUST IN: $5 TRILLION NVIDIA-BACKED STARCLOUD JUST ANNOUNCED IT WILL BE THE 1st COMPANY TO MINE #BITCOIN IN SPACE BTC IS INTERGALACTIC MONEY 🚀

JUST IN: BILLIONAIRE DAN MOREHEAD JUST SAID LIVE ON BLOOMBERG THAT ALL AI AGENTS WILL BUY AND SAVE IN #BITCOIN AND CRYPTO "THEY WILL HAVE TO USE CRYPTO" "THEY WILL NOT USE BANKS" "IT'S ALREADY HAPPENING" 🔥

JUST IN: 𝕏 Money plans to offer 6% APY, $250,000 insurance and 3% cash back on purchases. You can also order a physical metal card. This is going to be an insane product. 🤯

JUST IN: $16 TRILLION VISA JUST ANNOUNCED TO LAUNCH CRYPTO CREDIT CARDS IN OVER 100 COUNTRIES #BITCOIN AS GLOBAL MONEY. IT'S COMING 🚀

JUST IN: $14 TRILLION BLACKROCK JUST BOUGHT #BITCOIN COMPANY METAPLANET VIA iSHARES JAPAN ETF FOR THE 1st TIME IN HISTORY THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF WALL STREET ADOPTING BTC 🚀

New in Claude Code: Remote Control. Kick off a task in your terminal and pick it up from your phone while you take a walk or join a meeting. Claude keeps running on your machine, and you can control the session from the Claude app or claude.ai/code

NEW: Major investigation dropping February 26 on one of crypto’s most profitable businesses where multiple employees abused internal data to insider trade over a prolonged period of time.

In a future ruled by AI, you evolve, or get erased. Empires run on control. Revolutions run on code. You can train machines. You can't stop math. ₿ doesn't negotiate. The fight for freedom has just begun. ⚡📷 🤖

Anthropic is quite literally targeting a new trillion-dollar industry every day now. Every time a new Claude-based AI tool emerges, stocks in that industry are erasing $100B+ worth of market cap. The craziest part? We all know exactly what’s happening in real-time.

crypto guys right now

@trq212 Amazing!

We've added a new command to Claude Code called /insights When you run it, Claude Code will read your message history from the past month. It'll summarize your projects, how you use Claude Code, and give suggestions on how to improve your workflow.

@KobeissiLetter @grok When are they going to change the Fed chair?

In case you don’t realize what’s coming: The Chief Investment Officer of BlackRock is now expected to be the next Fed Chair. And, Trump says cutting rates is a “requirement” for the next Fed Chair and is actively calling for 1% interest rates. 2026 is going to be a wild year.

Let me rephrase: Ledger, a French security company has been breached multiple times which resulted in its customers private data being leaked has lead to targeted thefts and millions stolen. Current products have major issue like the battery for the Ledger Nano X. Now Ledger plans to max extract more via US IPO after recently announcing they will also charge a % for clear signing.

@JamesWynnReal James Wynn is jealousy’s whine. Can’t compete with even a sardine, so don’t try to compete with a white whale.

People who know, know. ‘Someone’ purchased $366 of $WhiteWhale and it is now worth $1.5m I see nobody on the timeline posting gains. Other influencers are now too starting to raise suspicions and ask questions. What guy, buys $366 (deep in the trenches + solana degen territory) and holds to $1.5m… not impossible.. people do it. BUT, no profit taking? None? On a token based on no meme? Let me guess, the ‘Treasury’ will OTC buy this wallet… Perrrrrfect way of looking like the good guy while cashing in on YOUR OWN BAGS?! Again, I’m playing devils advocate here. Maybe I’m sooooo wrong. But my alarm bells are ringing. The guy busts his account from $80m to $100 and a week later ‘CTO’s’ a meme in his name (ironic) turns into the knight and shining armour. Supply already scoped up, and then adds massive liquidity altering the price per token to $SOL — genius move. This guy is highly intelligent. But things just ain’t adding up. - Wynn

🚨 $AAVE (@aave) IS PLANNING ON DISTRIBUTING REVENUE GENERATED OUTSIDE THE PROTOCOL WITH TOKEN HOLDERS THIS IS HUGE 👀

@sjdedic All value created by Aave - smart contracts, frontend, IP, brand, distribution, everything - should belong 100% to the $AAVE token.

Look, the current situation around Aave is heated, but it’s a discussion we absolutely need to have. For everyone out there who’s unsure which side to pick, here’s my take. TLDR: both sides are wrong. There should be zero doubt about one thing: All value created by Aave - smart contracts, frontend, IP, brand, distribution, everything - should belong 100% to the $AAVE token. Once a project launches a token, it must fully commit to it. That also means accepting that the equity entity becomes economically irrelevant. Trying to make both equity and token accrue value almost always creates massive conflicts of interest, unnecessary complexity, and unhappy stakeholders. I can’t think of a single case where this has worked long-term. That said, token holders also need to get their expectations in check. Many token holders seem to believe that the only way to create value is by doing 100% buybacks. In most cases, that’s economically stupid. Let businesses reinvest capital: scale the team, expand distribution, do real marketing outside of crypto, acquire users. Do you really think companies like Apple, Amazon, or Tesla would exist today if they had distributed 100% of their revenue to shareholders in their early stages? Of course not, they'd probably even dead today. Instead, they doubled and tripled down until they became the giants they are today. Now, here’s where I think the Aave DAO is getting it seriously wrong: Have a bit more trust in @StaniKulechov and his team, and more generally in the founders you choose to invest behind. I know, this is much easier said than done in crypto, a space where founders rug daily. But that’s exactly why founder diligence is your responsibility. If you want long-term conviction, nothing matters more than deeply understanding the founder’s vision, incentives, and character - often far more than the idea or even the fundamentals. Do your job. Build conviction. Then let the founders execute. Even though these are crypto companies, they must operate like centralized, private companies to stay competitive. Otherwise, they will inevitably be outcompeted or absorbed by banks and corporates. Just look at Stripe’s Tempo vs their fully decentralized / idealistic competitors. The idea that Aave Labs should hand over brand assets, domains, socials, naming rights, github, basically everything, to a DAO is absurd. I can’t imagine anything less efficient than a DeFi protocol being fully governed by a DAO primarily made up of short-term, price-focused token holders who have little to no experience building sustainable businesses. The DAO taking over Aave would likely be the worst possible outcome - not just for Aave, but for DeFi as a whole. Token holders should have a voice and benefit 100% from the success of the protocol. Founders should serve token holders accordingly. Easier said than done. But that’s the only model that actually works. Trust in Stani or simply move on. But please don’t destroy @aave, arguably the best DeFi protocol, and one of the best applications crypto has ever produced.

@StaniKulechov DAOs don’t work. They inevitably get polluted by grifter, just look at the chaos in Polkadot right now. Rewards should be redistributed directly to token holders instead of being captured by intermediaries. Never give anything to a DAO; they will slowly rug through inefficiency

The recent DAO alignment proposal has been moved to Snapshot after extensive discussion. We realize the community is very interested in a path forward and is ready to make a decision. Time for tokenholders to weigh in and vote. snapshot.org/#/s:aavedao.et…