CrediBULL Crypto

There are crypto traders, and then there's based crypto traders.

Monumental indeed 🤝 I’ve been in crypto for some time now and even though price doesn’t show it, the amount of things in the pipeline for @hedera and the $HBAR ecosystem is ridiculous Whether it’s this year, next year or in 5 years doesn’t matter. A huge HTS wave is coming 🌊

@deebee_ Just so excited my bad 😂😂

@CredibleCrypto Reannouncing the announcement of the announcement. Wouldn't be crypto without it 😂

October 10th set me back on this project a bit- as I had set aside 6 figures to see it through but decided post 10/10 that those funds were probably better used to help me recover from that hit. But over the last few weeks I keep coming back to the idea (which is super exciting to me) and i've decided to push forward with it regardless. Won't be cutting any corners with this so it will take at least a year or more minimum- so don't expect anything soon- but when it's finally done I think it'll be worth the wait and I'm stoked to share it with you all when it's ready.

@MartySpanishCT Actually might, could you shoot me a DM just so that I have your info on file in case the need arises?

@CredibleCrypto Congrats and good luck my man. If you need any help for anything hit me up (+6yrs legal and regulatory compliance experience)

@Tradernaber Thank you sir!

@chriswadey82 Maybe closer to release :)

@CredibleCrypto You gonna give us any clues!? 😆

@LTCABUNDANCE On the contrary the above is stating it's possible we don't get another low...

@CredibleCrypto Always another low…

For some additional context we did have a sharp rejection off the local highs but the PA we have so far is near identical to the PA from a few weeks ago which led to new local highs anyways. Only thing certain atm is that this move up is def corrective- which is clear from the heavy overlap and lack of impulsive PA. But as we know, corrective moves can continue to grind higher as well and PA thus far gives us no indication of whether the corrective grind up has ended or whether we are still in the middle of it. Metrics under the hood look the same as they have for days now and nothing in particular sticks out atm.

@Freedtrader @GabrielLDALLAC Honestly depends on how things look at 80k+. Some alts may have moved up high enough off key levels to avoid revisiting the lows on a subsequent drop, especially those sitting on HTF support against BTC.

@CredibleCrypto @GabrielLDALLAC If we flush off of 80k, what would you expect to happen to the key alts you talk about? Would they also flush the local lows?

So that is technically possible- it's not something we haven't seen before (corrective move up at some point shifts to impulsive PA) but it's the exception not the rule. More often than not corrective moves up results in a failure at some point and then another sharp swing down that usually makes a new local low but can also truncate (fail to make a lower low) and then THAT move is followed by a true impulse.

@CredibleCrypto Would u expect an impulse perhaps to begin at 80k?

@GabrielLDALLAC That is very much in line with what I am leaning towards atm.

@CredibleCrypto Hi Cred! So, can we continue with this internal structure of higher bottoms and peaks, with the possibility of moving to the demand region at 80,000, and then presenting a corrective action down to the lows of the range? Thanks Man

@tradex22 Could it? Yes. Does it change the fact that R/R here for longs is in favor of an attempt? No.

@CredibleCrypto do you think CRV will hit your htf inval of .18?

Yea not much to update on that front- BTC dom looks like it's curling over and in general I think upside is limited relative to downside from current levels (with the exception of a blow off top scenario that may spike BTC dom temporarily) but has yet to really break down! Let's see!

@CredibleCrypto I’ve watched your two recent videos a few times but just wondering if you had any interesting developments on the BTC.D front? BTC nuked 50%, while BTC.D continues to mosey above 58%, all while ALTS have continued to eat ass everyday for the last 6 months got me in a pretzellol

@Doriang33333 It's been a great one eh.

@CredibleCrypto Been playing the .2275-.26 range for weeks.

@CInvestUK At this stage, yea pretty much lol.

@CredibleCrypto Summary- anything can happen 😂

@luren100x @cryptohofa @ConvexFinance Full tutorial here: youtu.be/Dg8WdTmMvyQ?si…

@cryptohofa @CredibleCrypto @ConvexFinance good post! what‘s the best way to lock cvx?

Just re-read @CredibleCrypto's Curve Wars thread — one of the best explainers on how Convex changed the game. Read that first if you haven’t already. 2026 bonus: what’s crazy is that the core thesis still holds. @ConvexFinance still controls about 53.5% of all veCRV. So the key idea — that aggregating governance power and routing incentives efficiently would matter a lot — was not some temporary cycle phenomenon. It became durable market structure. And I think that’s the part that aged best. Convex didn’t just help users farm harder. It simplified a system that would otherwise heavily favor large lockers, whales, and people willing to actively manage every moving part. Instead of forcing everyone to individually lock CRV, monitor gauges, optimize boosts, and stay on top of governance mechanics, it pooled that complexity into one layer and turned it into a much more accessible system for regular users. That sounds simple now, but at the time it was a huge shift. It took something that was technically powerful but operationally messy and made it far more usable. In a lot of ways, that was the real innovation: not inventing incentives, but organizing them better than everyone else. And the model clearly had second-order effects. The same “aggregate vote power, direct emissions, maximize capital efficiency” framework spread well beyond the original Curve context. Convex itself now shows sizable control across multiple vote-escrow ecosystems, not just veCRV. So what originally looked like one protocol finding an edge increasingly looks, in hindsight, like the emergence of a broader DeFi design pattern. That matters because it tells you this wasn’t just a one-cycle meta or some niche governance game that worked under a specific market setup. The structure had staying power. It solved a real coordination problem, and DeFi kept reusing the playbook because it worked. Also worth noting: Curve is still sitting around $1.8B TVL today. That alone says a lot. In a sector where narratives come and go fast, that kind of durability suggests the underlying liquidity engine and incentive design were not just clever in theory — they were resilient in practice. To me, that’s what makes all of this interesting to look back on now. It wasn’t just a clever setup for one moment in the market. It ended up being a structure that actually lasted. And in DeFi, that’s pretty rare. A lot of things get a ton of attention for a while and then fade once conditions change. This didn’t. The system kept working, people kept using it, and the logic behind it still makes sense years later. That’s really what stands out to me most — not just that it worked back then, but that it still feels relevant now. Feels like one of those things where the repricing will look obvious in hindsight. $CVX

@smw000001 Brother none of my references to trading have anything to do with spot holdings. Those positions remain unchanged, as they have for years.

@CredibleCrypto No positions ? What about those positions from last cycle ?

Yea another rejection/fakeout of the highs but I don't necessarily think this is some big plunge to the lows either- just more chop- and it's doing a good job of trapping both bulls and bears. Sitting on hands for now.

@Tardonatore @CryptoGrim @Capashnicho x.com/CredibleCrypto…

@CryptoGrim @Capashnicho @CredibleCrypto thoughts on this?

None of this shit matters until I sell $CRV above $4.00 🤟 We kicked ass today, doesn't mean shit for the big picture. Til the next one 🫡

@sourcererr @CryptoGrim @Capashnicho Have made my thoughts clear many times sir :)

@CryptoGrim @Capashnicho @CredibleCrypto what do you think