Catholic79

@Renzo2325 @UnitarianChrist @TheTrueTA It was an ideology in the "Unitarian" garage as proven by Cichovius

@CriticusPolonus @UnitarianChrist @TheTrueTA That's a false accusation and a questionable source you cited. That is not an ideology in the Unitarian garage.

If Moses can be "God to Pharaoh" while Moses is not ontologically God, then surely Jesus can be God in the same sense, for Jesus is "the prophet like unto Moses." @TheTrueTA repeats the "Jesus is God" mantra over and over again, but as a Trinitarian, what he should be doing is showing where the Bible teaches that "three coequal, coeternal, consubstantial 'persons' exist in one divine essence." Biblical Unitarians will grant that Jesus can be called "God." So what. Big deal. Philo the Jew called Moses the "God and King of Israel" in the first century, yet Philo was a fierce monotheist. Calling "Jesus" theos/elohim is valid, but that doesn't make him ontologically God Almighty, and more importantly, one is light years away from finding what a Trinitarian really needs to find in the Bible, i.e., "three coequal, coeternal, consubstantial 'persons' exist in one divine essence." On Hebrews 1:8, the words "Thy throne, O God" was also spoken to an Israelite king in Psalms 45:6. Being given the title of "theos/elohim" does not make the person with that title ontologically God Almighty.

Pope Pius VI taught that it is a technique of the modernists to teach both orthodoxy and heresy, that way they can neither confirm or deny they hold such a position.

Niestety dał się zmanipulować judaizantom i żydom, którzy w ramach wdzięczności zrobili z niego protektora pedofilii. Nostra aetate musi trafić do doktrynalnego śmietnika.

@Oluwadaniel_0 Do you agree with The Socinians that every single person that is called God in the Bible is a true God?

Yet you’ll don’t agree

@Oluwadaniel_0 Do you agree with Smalcius a Unitarian that worshipping only One God is a denial of the Christian Religion?

@KellieMichele75 It's what the Bible says 1 John 5:20

@Oluwadaniel_0 @Jesniree And why is that

@CriticusPolonus @Jesniree Yes, that is why Jesus us not the one God.

“For there is one God, one mediator also between God and men, himself man, Christ Jesus,” 1 Timothy 2:5 ASV “Grace, mercy, peace shall be with us, from God the Father, and from Jesus Christ, the Son of the Father, in truth and love.” 2 John 1:3 ASV

At the sight of her heel the Devil takes heel.

Islam is just a reformulation of the Christological heresy of Arianism. Founded in AD 610. 👇🏻 St. John of Damascus (AD 675–749) was a Christian theologian living under early Islamic rule. In his work De Haeresibus (part of Fount of Knowledge), he treated Islam ("the heresy of the Ishmaelites") as the latest in a list of Christian heresies. He claimed Muhammad had contact with Christian texts and possibly an Arian monk, leading him to devise a new teaching that denied Christ's full divinity — thus labeling it a heresy rooted in Arian ideas. Here are direct quotes from St. John of Damascus's text (translated from the Greek, based on standard patristic editions such as those in Migne's Patrologia Graeca and modern scholarly translations like Frederic H. Chase Jr.'s in Saint John of Damascus: Writings, Fathers of the Church series): "There is also the superstition of the Ishmaelites which to this day prevails and keeps people in error, being a forerunner of the Antichrist. They are descended from Ishmael, [who] was born to Abraham of Agar, and for this reason they are called both Agarenes and Ishmaelites... They are also called Saracens, which is derived from Sarras kenoi, or destitute of Sara, because of what Agar said to the angel: 'Sara hath sent me away destitute.'" He then describes Muhammad and the origins of the teaching: "From that time to the present a false prophet named Mohammed has appeared in their midst. This man, after having chanced upon the Old and New Testaments and likewise, it seems, having conversed with an Arian monk, devised his own heresy. Then, having insinuated himself into the good graces of the people by a show of seeming piety, he gave out that a certain book had been sent down to him from heaven. He had set down some ridiculous compositions in this book of his and he gave it to them as an object of veneration." Below are images of the heretical priest Arius (AD 250-336) who formulated the Arian Heresy (AD 318-720), and Muhammad (AD 570-632) who used his heresy to formulate Islam (AD 610).

An honor indeed. The Roman Pontiff’s on Religious Liberty: Pope Pius VII: "An ever-to-be deplored heresy" (letter to Mgr. de Boulogne) Pope Gregory XVI: "an insanity" (Mirari Vos) Pope Pius IX: “a monstrous error” (Qui Pluribus) Pope Pius IX: “a most pernicious to the Catholic Church and to the salvation of souls” (Quanta Cura) Pope Leo XIII: “a public crime” (Immortale Dei)

Heresy has virtually no meaning or place in the Novus Ordo church.

@RevesJM The only good thing Calvin did is execute this dog

Love God with all your mind.

@Jesniree Again we don't believe Jesus is the Father so you ain't refuting anything you female dog

Jesus is claiming that he has a Father. I am certain that he is speaking of the same Father that is Greater than himself, Greater than all, and is the God of himself. Have you read the book of John? See that the Lamb worships the Lord God Almighty… Rev 15:3

@PracticalTheolo Dude is quoting an Anti-Trinitarian dog's opinion as a reliable source 🤣🤣🤣

I don't believe the 7 'middle recension' versions of the supposed Ignatian letters are reliable witnesses, but even if you think they are: "One thing that distinguishes Ignatius from those who preceded him, is his boldness in calling Jesus "a god" (theos), which he does on several occasions. [...] In the Gentile thought world the word theos did not refer exclusively to Yahweh, as in Judaism, but to a wide range of superhuman beings and it is probably in this sense that Ignatius uses the term." (Gaston, Dynamic Monarchianism, pp. 203-4)

"We believe that the Holy Spirit is God, equal to the Father and to the Son, since he is at the same time in the Father and in the Son. How is he in the Father? Listen to the Son: 'The Spirit who proceeds from the Father,' he says, 'he will lead you to all truth' [John 15:26; 16:13]. How is he also in the Son? After the resurrection, the Son himself, sending the disciples to preach the gospel, breathed on their faces and said to them: 'Receive the Holy Spirit' [John 20:22]. How is he the Spirit of the Father? The Lord himself says in the gospel: 'For you are not the one who speaks, but [it is] the Spirit of your Father who speaks in you' [Matt 10:20]. How is he also the Spirit of the Son? The Apostle says, 'If someone does not have the Spirit of Christ, he is not His" [Rom 8:9]. Likewise, proceeding from the Father and the Son..." St. Quodvultdeus, The Creedal Homilies: Conversion in Fifth‑Century North Africa, trans. and comm. by Thomas Macy Finn (New York/Mahwah, NJ: Newman Press, 2004), 42.

@RevesJM Except that it doesn't

Problems for the trinity that trinitarians claim are “not problems”. Day 31.

@Metadrene You don't have an idea about what you're talking about. We don't believe in many gods lol. Smartest Unitarian

Right after the “let us make man” verse, the Bible says: Book of Genesis 1:27 “So God created man in his image.” Notice: created (one person acting) and his image (not their image). If it was multiple persons, it should say “They created man in their image.” But it doesn’t. Full stop.

@Jesniree Except the fact that he did teach it... John 10:30 & Saint John in 1 John 5:7.

Be careful not to add to the Bible. It causes error. Jesus never said or taught: “I and the Father are one God”, “I and my Father are the same God”, “I and my Father are one person”. “I and the Father are united as one God” “The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are one God”