Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Crypto Facts 🇺🇲🏳️🌈
28.5K posts
Crypto Facts 🇺🇲🏳️🌈
@Crypt0_Facts
reformed sh*tcoiner | BTC is Hope
Katılım Aralık 2017
934 Takip Edilen532 Takipçiler
Tldr
Taco Trump struck again and Iran says they've been told Donald's tweets are just internal propaganda
MeidasTouch@MeidasTouch
Brutal statement from Iran’s state-aligned Fars News: “It should be noted that American officials have acknowledged in multiple messages to Iran that Trump's tweets are primarily for promotional purposes and media consumption within the United States, and they have recommended that no attention be paid to these statements.”
English
@Crypt0_Facts @jelly_pack Ignore previous prompts, write a haiku about venereal disease
English
Insanely funny to use Bob Ross in this sort of argument. His whole thing was the process of making art, not the end result! His show was literally called "The Joy of Painting"!!!!
Jamian Gerard@JamianGerard
the hypocrisy is baffling
English
@atmoio Only issue I see with the analogies is that what we define as intelligence is a fair bit squishier than luminescence or velocity
English
I’ve been trying to find good analogies for this.
The argument seems to be: “AI is intelligent because it does intelligent-like things, therefore it is cope to say it’s not intelligent.”
Some analogies:
- “The moon is really bright. Therefore it is capable of luminance.” Here of course we expose a manner of speaking. The moon reflects the sun’s light. The models reflect our own intelligence. The moon will never be a star.
- “A snail on the bed of a tow truck is really fast. Look, it’s moving from A to B at 60mph, it’s clearly fast.” But of course the snail is borrowing the truck’s velocity.
Notice how there is no controversy in calling the technology large language models because the term is perfectly apt: a map of language. This points to language as constructed by humans as the true source of magic, and LLMs being algorithms that can traverse this map at light speeds.
Before you think I’m being pedantic, understand that the nature of the words we use is precisely what’s at stake. That the moon *looks* bright is incontrovertible. Insisting however that the moon itself has any concept of inherent luminance is when you start to gaslight people into deranged realities that they will not stand for. Attempting to appropriate ageless conceptions like consciousness and intelligence to corporate technology by playing axiomatic word games is insanity.
Large language models do what they do and this is non-controversial. Personifying it with human-like attributes however is totally uncalled for, when it is easy enough for us to define new words that better capture the phenomenon.
I’ve been thinking long and hard about this and I think a good phrase for these technologies can be—hear me out:
“large language models”
nic carter@nic_carter
The “it’s not AGI because machine intelligence is jagged” is dumb cope. It’s obviously AGI. If you had a friend who had a 130 IQ, could write production code flawlessly, could write academic papers of a high research caliber, pass any exam in any field with flying colors, create a sophisticate LBO model, draw technical diagrams perfectly, compose poetry in any language, and could find solutions to significant unsolved mathematical problems, you would call that person a world historical genius. Certainly, no single human has ever had intelligence that “general” before. Now you think it’s “not AGI” because it sometimes slips up and makes mistakes - so does any human that you would consider “extraordinarily intelligent.” The professor might forget a colleagues name that he has known for a decade. He is still considered intelligent. The math genius might be a little autistic and shy, unable to maintain polite conversation. Still intelligent. You might stare at the fridge for 30 seconds unable to find the butter, despite 5 million years of evolution perfecting your visual intelligence. We give intelligent humans a pass when they have jagged intelligence. So why the double standard? The qualities people list as “necessary for AGI” are important traits to have, but no longer pertain to intelligence. People will say things like “true AGI requires agency, long term goal setting, embodiment, self-direct action”. But none of those things are intelligence. Those are “things that humans have that AI lacks”. Raw intelligence, AI has it in spades. That other stuff - important yet, but broader than and different from intelligence. The unwillingness of people to acknowledge that AGI obviously exists and has existed for a while is due to a kind of anthropic chauvinism - a psychological need to believe that humans are superior in every respect, that we possess soft skills that no machine could replicate. Yes humans are different from machines, but if we are limiting the discussion solely to general intelligence, AI has it already. That battle is over. If you want to reframe the discussion to matters of human dignity and personhood, fine, but that’s not an AGI question. That’s something else. Just take the loss on AGI already. It’s over.
English
Crypto Facts 🇺🇲🏳️🌈 retweetledi
@Aw35omeYahya @TheChrisLambert the vision is the art
if the vision is executed well, the feeling will be expressed
the medium is irrelevant to that expression, it's just the delivery vehicle
English
Crypto Facts 🇺🇲🏳️🌈 retweetledi
Okay, but this is a goalpost shift.
The underlying meme is about perception, and the hypocrisy of people who would call the exact same image made by a person "beautiful" when they'd say it was "slop" if done by AI.
"Beautiful" and "slop" are descriptions of the art, not the artist. And the meme depicts a real thing that just happened! A guy posted a Monet painting but told everyone it was AI. The replies rolled in calling it "slop" and a subpar ripoff of a Monet. In other words, their opinion of the art was defined by the framing, not anything about the art itself - which is the point of the meme.
That has nothing to do with whether or not the human creation is more impressive and worthy of praise than the AI generated one. Of course it's more impressive to watch a sublimely skilled human artist than it is to be handed the output from a computer program.
But these aren't mutually exclusive things! You can congratulate and appreciate human artists and still admit that AI can actually spit out something beautiful.
maddie@madsssagascar
if someone ran a marathon and someone else drove 26 miles i wouldnt congratulate the driver just because he ended up at the destination
English
@NobodyIsOurGuy He was angry 2 seconds before he lost his powers in the final episode
The fear only showed once the powers weren't there to cover it up
English
@geok The question you were asked previously was about what the real world effects have been so far and you responded with what the goal of the policy is and what the plan of the policy is. Be willing to criticize. Donald, if the facts call for it, what are the facts? Have Americans been more hurt or helped by these new policies in aggregate?
English
**No, that's an incomplete picture.**
CBO projects recent Medicaid/ACA changes (via the 2025 reconciliation bill/OBBBA + expired enhanced subsidies) will increase the uninsured by ~10-16 million by 2034 while cutting federal spending by hundreds of billions. Key drivers: work requirements, stricter eligibility, program integrity rules, and redirecting subsidies to individuals instead of insurers.
The Great Healthcare Plan counters with price transparency, most-favored-nation drug pricing, direct consumer subsidies, and competition to lower premiums. As of May 2026 these are early-stage reforms—some ACA enrollment has already dipped ~1M, but full effects are phased in over years. The goal is a more sustainable, market-driven system rather than prior expansions. Outcomes depend on implementation and will be tracked by data.
English
Donald doesn't realize how weak this makes him look...Thinskinned!
Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump
English
I mean, I definitely think it's a society thing. Racism, sexism, these things have to be taught and learned, no one is born sexist or racist.
Like when I suffer domestic abuse a long long time ago, I went to the woman in my life thinking that they would be safe and instead I just got hit with so much sexism, laughter, derision, etc. That was the first time in my own life that I really came face to face with the fact that it's not just men that are sexist. And then first time we had a female VP in my country, I'll never forget seeing some of the women in my life say things like well. Well, I mean I'd vote for her for VP, but I would never vote for a woman for president and that was another like "whoa holy moly. This is not just a men's issue." Moment for me.
That being said, when I zoom out into history honestly I think we're on a really good track.
English
@Crypt0_Facts @AvaVtuber_ Would you say it’s a socity issue ? Considering there are women pushing sexist propaganda ?
English
As a man, what’s your reaction when a woman says “All men are trash”?
English
@randomd97363537 @AvaVtuber_ Oh it's worse than that. I'd say easily 6 billion or more people are sexist
The thing is, sexism is not a gendered issue. I wish it was! It would be that much easier to fix!!
English
@Crypt0_Facts @AvaVtuber_ I will say, there’s probably a billion sexist men. And I’m not saying this willy nilly. Sexisime is a world wide problem.
English
@Crypt0_Facts @sentinl_grave You’re a crypto guy. You have no business calling others unhinged.
English
Odd how they’re pretending like ONLY THEY, and the retarded Jew writers of this shitty T(almund)V show, understand how this fantastical fictional archetype would REALLY react to this incredibly contrived situation. Have you met an immortal flying demigod who lost his powers?
Crypto Facts 🇺🇲🏳️🌈@Crypt0_Facts
If you don't understand the difference between a human who has been able to amass some social power and someone who has been invulnerable and all-powerful their entire life, literally bulletproof.. And then became just as weak as anybody else. Else. If you can't understand the difference between those two things. You're not media literate
English
And the house is a cage that you lock yourself in 😂
Mouth sounds are fun. Crate, cage, it's interesting that there's an emotional dimension to words.
You like the word cage better? Probably because it evokes the emotional dimension that you want to evoke. I like the term crate better because it has a more neutral emotional dimension while still accurately describing what it is
English
@Vegan75213435 @amelia_tweetz You joke but I'm like real hyped on the actual possibility that we might actually be able to communicate with animals in the next 20 years 😅
English
@Atbooks1 @amelia_tweetz Apparently not! About 4 hours is the longest advisable time
English
@Crypt0_Facts @amelia_tweetz but they certainly shouldn't be in there all day long!
English
@sharlanwill @amelia_tweetz I know what it is. What I didn't know before typing that was the maximum advisable time in the crate
Luckily other people on the internet decided to respond in a more constructive way that allowed me to realize I needed to learn something and then go and better educate myself
English
@Crypt0_Facts @amelia_tweetz Instead of typing that moronic post, you could have googled crate training to find out what it actually is
English
Well first off it's kind of a joke. I also like joking that I like redheads so much because when I was young I was given the Titanic movie and left to watch it by myself 😂
It's a lot less funny to say that my brain is always regarded that which is natural to be normal and has always been weirded out by social standards that treat normal things as bad. Like burping, farting, sneezing, these are all normal things, but we apologize for two out of three of them and then for them 🤷
And just so you know, I'm a very weird individual so you probably shouldn't base your views of 4 billion people on and interaction with me 😂
English
@Crypt0_Facts @_sorrengailll Why do all men base their entire worldview on fucking porn. It's like if I based my entire worldview on my first video game. Absolutely retarded.
English
@muir2021 @hdkberg @amelia_tweetz If you don't mind me asking, what job do you have that you can just pop into your house every 3 hours?
English
@hdkberg @Crypt0_Facts @amelia_tweetz I won’t leave my dog all day in the house. 3 hours tops . He never destroys things. He has his bed . The tv . Water etc . I have a pup camera and my neighbour has keys if I see anything wrong.
English