Cryptonymous

5.7K posts

Cryptonymous banner
Cryptonymous

Cryptonymous

@Crypt0nym0us1

Katılım Ekim 2013
1.3K Takip Edilen2.6K Takipçiler
Cryptonymous
Cryptonymous@Crypt0nym0us1·
@DPJHodges You’re basing this on one by election win in a left wing stronghold? Reform are forecasted to do well / win the GE, but no one is saying they would win every seat. Strongholds like this will always exist, but doesn’t mean huge right wing / swing regions will turn Reform.
English
0
0
0
21
(((Dan Hodges)))
(((Dan Hodges)))@DPJHodges·
It wasn't. We were told Reform were in with a chance of winning the seat. They didn't even come close. They will continue to be major disruptors, and a serious political force. But there is now no prospect of them winning an election outright. They have hit their ceiling.
Arron Banks@Arron_banks

The result last night was terrific for Reform, in an area with a very high Muslim population. The conservatives had their worse ever result in a by election. With the left split between Green & Labour, Reform must destroy the Conservative Party & unite the centre right. Roll on May..

English
502
157
1.3K
191K
Cryptonymous
Cryptonymous@Crypt0nym0us1·
@geethreedeebees @Slarty247 @NicholasTyrone I understand your hope, but it doesn’t show that. Greens won a traditional left wing seat. Bad for Labour, but expected for Reform. When Reform won their by election last year, it didn’t mean they would definitely win the GE. Also, Reform is still leading in the polls.
English
0
0
0
10
Nick Tyrone
Nick Tyrone@NicholasTyrone·
For those saying this was a bad loss for Reform consider: 1. The result suggests Reform are at around 30% nationally, way ahead of the rest. 2. The Greens winning points to a more split left-wing vote in the near future. 3. Sectarian voting works to Reform’s grand argument.
English
43
6
96
6.3K
Cryptonymous
Cryptonymous@Crypt0nym0us1·
@kim_oneil @Slarty247 @NicholasTyrone Respectfully, I dont think it shows that. This Green win was in a Labour safe seat where labour had a history of winning. It is listed around 400 in Reforms hit list. The fact that reform came second in such a left wing area is huge.
English
0
0
0
7
Cryptonymous
Cryptonymous@Crypt0nym0us1·
@cezthesocialist “No evidence of this”…checks where other wealth taxes have been launched.
Cryptonymous tweet media
English
0
0
0
10
cez
cez@cezthesocialist·
It’s often said that if we tax the rich more they will just leave and overall tax revenue will be lower. Not only is there no evidence of this but the overwhelming majority of millionaires, especially those who would be affected, support a 2% wealth tax on assets over £10 million
cez tweet media
English
152
221
787
27.6K
Cryptonymous
Cryptonymous@Crypt0nym0us1·
@PaulWelters @tonymeadows @BladeoftheS This wouldn’t work. Most countries who have tried wealth tax’s repeal them as they eventually reduce tax revenue. Sure, you can tax non moveable assets, but the loss in income tax revenue makes it not worth it. 60% of income tax revenue comes from top 10%
Cryptonymous tweet media
English
0
0
0
43
Paul Welters
Paul Welters@PaulWelters·
@tonymeadows @BladeoftheS Or we could just tax the rich more, a lot more. Close all the loopholes. Make Accountancy LLPs liable for failed tax avoidance schemes with a 100% surcharge and no partners' liability waiver for schemes judged illegal.
English
4
0
9
557
BladeoftheSun
BladeoftheSun@BladeoftheS·
Maximum monthly State Pension. Luxembourg £5,426 Norway £1,839 Switzerland £1,657 Denmark £1,486 Sweden £1,373 Belgium £1,338 Netherlands £1,322 France £1,254 Spain £1,238 UK £997 Guess which is unaffordable?
English
360
2.5K
8.7K
427K
Cryptonymous
Cryptonymous@Crypt0nym0us1·
@maxblunt @ScannellLe35289 @w_stronge lol - blocked for stating facts. You can’t even come up with a counter argument. Stay in your social media echo chamber then - critical thinking is probably too much for you.
English
0
0
0
7
Cryptonymous
Cryptonymous@Crypt0nym0us1·
@maxblunt @ScannellLe35289 @w_stronge They can’t stay out of landlords have to sell - they would have to be evicted for landlords to sell their properties. Abolish landlords = millions tenants forced out.
English
2
0
0
20
Cryptonymous
Cryptonymous@Crypt0nym0us1·
@JENBROOK8 @DanSamme Okay - I retract the “tried” from my post. Zack has hypnotic powers that cause women’s breasts to increase in size. He should run with that for the next election.
English
1
0
0
28
Dan Samme
Dan Samme@DanSamme·
Zack Polanski is honestly every politicians worst nightmare right now. Hard act to be relatable but still portray authority and hes doing it very well. Inspired decision to be on The Last Leg last night and he smashed it out the park.
English
470
226
2.3K
50.8K
Cryptonymous
Cryptonymous@Crypt0nym0us1·
@GoluMolu___ @OliDugmore Wealthy already do pay more tax. Over 60% of tax revenue is generated by top 10%. All landlord income is also subject tax. By banning landlords you actually reduce tax revenue. & by penalising higher earners you risk losing tax revenue. This has been done & failed, see image
Cryptonymous tweet media
English
1
0
0
19
Ben Lux
Ben Lux@GoluMolu___·
@Crypt0nym0us1 @OliDugmore The current system is impractical, rents keep rising higher eating larger portions of our incomes while house prices rise higher keeping them at a near unattainable level transferring more wealth into the pockets of those who don't need it. We've been conditioned to accept it
English
1
0
0
54
Oli Dugmore
Oli Dugmore@OliDugmore·
Housing secretary says Greens are “wacky” for trying to abolish landlords. Also that he doesn’t know their housing policies.
English
35
10
68
13.9K
Cryptonymous
Cryptonymous@Crypt0nym0us1·
@Heccles94 Flawed logic. There may be homes, but wouldn’t mean everyone has money to buy the houses. It just means there would be a lot of empty properties & your options would be either buy a house you can’t afford or live on the street. Would cost councils trillions to acquire them all.
English
1
0
2
149
Harry Eccles
Harry Eccles@Heccles94·
People say, without landlords there would be no homes. Nope, there would still be homes just no landlords. Without billionaires, there would be no money? Nope. They'red still be money, just no billionaires. Without bosses there would be no work! Nope plenty of work to do, just no bosses.
English
166
67
200
8K
Cryptonymous
Cryptonymous@Crypt0nym0us1·
@GoluMolu___ @OliDugmore It’s an impractical policy. With what money would councils be able to buy rentals? It would cost literally trillions to buy all rental properties if landlordism were outlawed. Focus should go on building more, which would increase supply and lower price.
English
1
0
0
16
Ben Lux
Ben Lux@GoluMolu___·
@Crypt0nym0us1 @OliDugmore Well if houses were cheaper because they weren't being bought out by the wealthy to rent to working and middle class families then yes people would buy them. Plus they want to allow councils to buy up rent houses to then be able to provide in their communities
English
1
0
1
23
Cryptonymous
Cryptonymous@Crypt0nym0us1·
@PhilipProudfoot Their income is mobile… they are the largest contributor to income tax (around 60% of income tax revenue comes from the top 10% of earners). Sure, they’ll sell assets as they leave - but we lose massive amounts of income tax revenue and will be net worse off.
English
0
0
1
96
Philip Proudfoot
Philip Proudfoot@PhilipProudfoot·
Their assets aren’t mobile. And they’ll be significantly less mobile as individuals if we apply an exit tax/ citizenship tax Tom’s argument is an ideological defense of a situation that has gotten is into the very mess we are in today. Inequality is the real enemy of growth.
Tom Harwood@tomhfh

There are just 55 billionaires resident in all of the UK. 55. By comparison there are 123 billionaires in New York City alone. These are literally the most mobile people on the face of the planet. Any tax system that is predicated upon squeezing the hyper mobile will fail.

English
104
59
482
138.6K
Cryptonymous
Cryptonymous@Crypt0nym0us1·
@sallonsax How would councils be able to purchase rental housing if landlord are abolished? It would cost trillions. There would be a massive decrease in availability of rental property and a whole lot of empty houses on the market with no buyers.
English
0
0
1
43
Cryptonymous
Cryptonymous@Crypt0nym0us1·
@ratcliff_jake Wait till you actually ready their fiscal policies…you won’t want to join then
English
1
0
1
302
dominic dyer
dominic dyer@domdyer70·
Britain must do the same
dominic dyer tweet media
English
343
1.7K
9.7K
134K
Cryptonymous
Cryptonymous@Crypt0nym0us1·
@AaronBastani Can’t vote for him… he can engage the youth, but his fiscal policies are inherently damaging
English
0
0
0
33
Cryptonymous
Cryptonymous@Crypt0nym0us1·
@ewanalexander65 @Matthayden65 @owenjonesjourno Starmer might not even be PM by the next election. Greens policies on Taxation, foreign policy and abolishing landlords will decimate the UK economy, plunging more into poverty. Any sensible person knows this and would vote for anything but green (and ideally not reform either)
English
0
0
0
44
Ewan Alexander
Ewan Alexander@ewanalexander65·
@Crypt0nym0us1 @Matthayden65 @owenjonesjourno Er no we wont. I've voted Labour for 42 years but will never do so again. I hope that they are totally destroyed at the next election. Starmer is the worst PM in my lifetime even Thatcher had principles , Starmer has none.
English
1
0
0
32
Cryptonymous
Cryptonymous@Crypt0nym0us1·
@Heccles94 He’s not going to get it - they targets they have put on it are insane. This whole story is just noise
English
0
0
0
34
Harry Eccles
Harry Eccles@Heccles94·
Musk is going to receive a pay package of $1000,000,000,000. That's 19,000,000 NHS nurses for one year. That's the entire NHS budget for the whole UK - three times over. That's enough money to feed the world's hungry, with remaining change.
English
1.8K
513
1.7K
393.7K

Keşfet

@DPJHodges @geethreedeebees @Slarty247 @NicholasTyrone @kim_oneil @cezthesocialist @PaulWelters @tonymeadows