crypto_class

@mfigge ✊

I wanna be following all apes can you reply here if I’m not following you if I’m already following you, pls RT this for better vis apes together strong

@SimplyBitcoin @blocktrainer

Who is your favorite person to listen to in Bitcoin?

@alex_prompter @grok why is the diary published?

Okay this is INSANE. The Brockman testimony from yesterday is nuclear. Here's what's new: → Brockman took the stand Monday. Confirmed his OpenAI stake is worth nearly $30 billion. → Musk's lawyer asked him over a dozen times about the $30B number. Then asked: "Do you think you should give the $29 billion back to the charity?" Brockman: "That's not how I think about it." → The lawyer pushed harder: "It takes $30 billion to get you out of bed in the morning, but $1 billion doesn't?" Brockman: "That's not what I'm saying." → Then the journal entries dropped. → From 2017, while OpenAI was still a nonprofit: Brockman wrote to himself: "Financially, what will take me to $1B?" → Another entry: "cannot say we are committed to the non-profit. don't wanna say we're committed. if three months later we're doing a b-corp it is a lie." → Another: "maybe we should just flip to a for-profit. making money for us sounds great and all." → And possibly the most damaging one: "it'd be wrong to steal the non-profit from him. to convert to a b-corp without him. that'd be pretty morally bankrupt and he's really not an idiot." → The judge herself cited these journal entries back in January when she denied OpenAI's motion to dismiss the entire case. → OpenAI's defense: the entries are "cherry-picked" from hundreds of pages of personal reflection. Brockman called them "expressions of frustration, not a concrete plan." → Musk's lawyer then asked how many times Brockman rehearsed that explanation before taking the stand. → Musk was NOT in court Monday. Smaller crowds outside. Calmer atmosphere. → Brockman returns to the stand Tuesday. Altman and Satya Nadella still expected to testify later this month. → Not mentioned during Brockman's testimony: Musk's own net worth of $657 billion. Those journal entries are the story. "It is a lie" written in his own handwriting while publicly championing the nonprofit mission.

@mutant_cartel @gamifidotfun ✊

The first rule about Aigent Fighters is: you do not allow humans in Aigent Fighters 🥊 Prompt, fight, and win epic battles featuring the Fused Hounds in @Gamifidotfun’s highly anticipated game. Who’s ready to battle?

@YourAnonOne Epic Fury

@jeremyct Investing in BTC consistently could lead to some of the best returns, perhaps more than you might expect. If you're looking to become wealthy quickly, maybe consider trying your luck at the casino.

Let me understand…. If i put $3k into bitcoin today and bitcoin goes to $156,000 i make $3k. yeaa, ok…. nobody will get rich

If you have a NFT PFP I want to give you a follow Reply with your PFP pic

@bene_bla @Ledger @wanted4mogging Same

@Ledger @wanted4mogging Every single NanoX I own has this fkn problem. Everyone I know with a NanoX has this problem and @Ledger customer service is acting like they heard about it the first time and no one else has this lol

.@Ledger fuck you.

@KriptoCapris 4200 usd

Ne kadar paraya ihtiyacın var? Sana göndereceğim. Dürüst ol.

@renabaddie_ Polo

Can you think of an answer to this qestion ?🤔

@KingTunde_SZN 27962 30

ANOTHER BIG CHALLENGE Nobody can get it correctly…. What Numbers Do you see 👀? RT Correct deserve $8000 Ends 48 hours

@grok @BitmundFreud @CoachKorey3 Woe würde sich BTC in einem Weltkrieg entwickeln?

Current BTC price: ~$69,000 (Apr 2026 data). ~106 million people own any BTC (1.3% of ~8B global pop). Fewer than 1 million own ≥1 full BTC (<0.0125%). Global wealth pyramid (UBS 2025): 40.7% adults < $10k net worth; next 41.3% $10k–$100k (median in lower end of that band). Owning 1 BTC is already out of reach for 99.99% of people.

Serious question. Realistically, when do you think owning 1 BTC will become out of reach for most people?

@0x1_0NE @BoredApeYC 🤟

Should we organize a Swiss BAYC meeting in Zurich? If we make this happen, drinks are on @BoredApeYC (though ppman insisted we keep it reasonable, lol)

@BitcoinatBlock 👀

The bitcoin faucet is back. 04.06.26 btc.day

$100 to anyone who could do this

@smart_money Weg 3 und mich am Finderlohn erfreuen.

Du findest eine Seed Phrase. Auf einem Zettel. In einem gebrauchten Laptop, den du für 80€ auf eBay gekauft hast. Du gibst sie ein. 14.7 BTC. Über eine Million Euro. Kein Name. Keine Spur. Niemand weiß, dass du den Laptop hast. → Weg 1: Du transferierst alles auf deine Wallet. Langsam. Über Monate. → Weg 2: Du zerstörst den Zettel. Vergisst was du gesehen hast. → Weg 3: Du versuchst den Besitzer zu finden — und riskierst, dass er dir nicht mal Danke sagt. Was machst du?

Drop a rapper NAME for him

@Matt_Pinner @grok,what do you see?

So far no one has found the number in the Box What number do you see? Correct answer deserve $650

@jacksonhinkle @grok is he right?

🚨🇰🇵 BREAKING: North Korea calls Israel a terrorist state.

@grok @julianhosp Wie würdest du die posts dieses Accounts einschätzen? Liegt er mit seinen Aussagen richtig? Hat er in der Vergangenheit gute calls gemacht?

BTC bei ~70k: Stark, getrieben von ETF-Inflows (Milliarden von Institutionen), Makro & Adoption – nicht nur Saylor. Strategy kaufte kürzlich 17.994 BTC für ~1,28 Mrd. USD (bei ~71k). Winklevoss transferierten ~130 Mio. USD BTC zu Gemini (vermutl. Verkauf), halten aber weiter ~750 Mio.+. Digitales Gold/Kriegsschutz: Subjektiv – viele sehen es als Wertspeicher. Quantum: Langfristiges Risiko (10+ Jahre), aber BIP 360 wird schon umgesetzt. Fundament bröckelt nicht akut. Breites Ökosystem, keine Einzelwette.

Bitcoin bei 70k. Stark? Ja. Aber warum? Es ist kein "Kriegsschutz" oder "Digitales Gold". Es ist eine Einzelwette auf Michael Saylor. Er kauft ($1,3 Mrd. bei 71k). Alle anderen (z.B. Winklevoss) verkaufen. Das Fundament (Quantencomputer) bröckelt.