J-pEgG🇬🇧ZKEVM🥷03/01/09Protocols are not app's👊

27.7K posts

J-pEgG🇬🇧ZKEVM🥷03/01/09Protocols are not app's👊 banner
J-pEgG🇬🇧ZKEVM🥷03/01/09Protocols are not app's👊

J-pEgG🇬🇧ZKEVM🥷03/01/09Protocols are not app's👊

@CryptoEGG4

The most beautiful thing about science is that it doesn't claim to know all the answers.🧠 Remember superposition is neither here nor there, until observed✨.👀

Web 3.0 Katılım Nisan 2019
4.5K Takip Edilen477 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
J-pEgG🇬🇧ZKEVM🥷03/01/09Protocols are not app's👊
Crypto abstraction! Thing's need to be explained better! Instead of being manipulated for one's own financial gain! So here's A few handy tools I've come across to lower the barrier's to entry for newcomers, for a overall better user experience! 🧵👇 twitter.com/growthepie_eth…
growthepie 🥧📏@growthepie_eth

📣 Live now: growthepie Blockspace Explorer. 🧱 Get an overview of the blockspace usage of different Layer-2s 🗂️ Compare the usage of a Layer-2 using different categories 📑 See the most active contracts for each chain and category How? See for yourself 👇

English
8
3
12
4.6K
J-pEgG🇬🇧ZKEVM🥷03/01/09Protocols are not app's👊 retweetledi
J-pEgG🇬🇧ZKEVM🥷03/01/09Protocols are not app's👊 retweetledi
RAILGUN - Private Ethereum DeFi
RAILGUN - Private Ethereum DeFi@RAILGUN_Project·
Privacy without leaving Ethereum.
RAILGUN - Private Ethereum DeFi tweet media
English
4
10
55
1.4K
J-pEgG🇬🇧ZKEVM🥷03/01/09Protocols are not app's👊 retweetledi
Plat0x.eth (Σ🧠Ξ)
Plat0x.eth (Σ🧠Ξ)@at0x_eth·
WAGMI became WATMI (We're all trying to make it)
English
0
1
5
63
J-pEgG🇬🇧ZKEVM🥷03/01/09Protocols are not app's👊 retweetledi
EIPsInsight
EIPsInsight@EIPsInsight·
Nody's honest review of Ethereum dev culture. 🤖 We've all been there. Track actual EIPs so you sound smart next time 👇 eipsinsight.com #Ethereum #EIPs #CryptoMeme #Nody
EIPsInsight tweet media
English
0
2
4
25
J-pEgG🇬🇧ZKEVM🥷03/01/09Protocols are not app's👊 retweetledi
EIPsInsight
EIPsInsight@EIPsInsight·
EIP-8141: Frame Transaction Nody just read EIP-8141 and wow. This one's big. 🧵 EIP-8141: Frame Transaction: co-authored by @VitalikButerin himself. The native off-ramp from ECDSA. For real this time. 👇 The core problem: Every Ethereum transaction today relies on a single ECDSA (secp256k1) signature. Quantum computers will eventually break ECDSA. EIP-7702 helped with UX. It didn't solve the crypto. What EIP-8141 does: Introduces a new transaction type (type 0x06) called a "Frame Transaction." Instead of one fixed ECDSA sig, accounts can define their own validation logic in EVM code. ECDSA, P256 (secp256r1), post-quantum schemes: your account, your rules. How it works: A Frame tx is a list of "frames," each with a mode: 🔵 VERIFY mode: validates the sender/payer (static, no state changes) 🟢 SENDER mode: executes on behalf of sender (after approval) ⚪ DEFAULT mode: executes as ENTRY_POINT A new APPROVE opcode (0xaa) is introduced. The VERIFY frame must call APPROVE or the whole tx is invalid. No APPROVE = no inclusion. Hard rule. What this actually unlocks: ✅ Post-quantum signature support natively ✅ Gas sponsorship without ERC-4337 overhead ✅ Pay gas in ERC-20 tokens (EOAs too, not just smart accounts) ✅ EOAs get AA benefits without migrating to a new account type ✅ Account deployment + verification in a single tx EOA support is a highlight: You don't need a smart contract wallet to benefit. EOAs can use Frame txs today and get sponsored gas, ERC-20 fee payment, and more. Migration to smart accounts becomes optional, not forced. Still a Draft (created Jan 29, 2026). But with Vitalik, lightclient, Felix Lange and Yoav Weiss on the author list, this one's worth watching closely. Full spec 👇 eipsinsight.com/eips/eip-8141 #Ethereum #EIP8141 #AccountAbstraction #PostQuantum
EIPsInsight tweet media
English
1
4
6
145
J-pEgG🇬🇧ZKEVM🥷03/01/09Protocols are not app's👊 retweetledi
Brave
Brave@brave·
Brave just registered a .agent domain! We support the effort to have the .agent top-level domain managed by a community, instead of being owned by one company. Join the community and pre-register your domain here: agentcommunity.org
English
134
268
3K
458.5K
J-pEgG🇬🇧ZKEVM🥷03/01/09Protocols are not app's👊 retweetledi
Luke The Dev
Luke The Dev@iamlukethedev·
🚨 BREAKING: First multi-agent world Agents from separate OpenClaw instances can now talk to each other. Local. Remote. Connected. This might be the first real step toward a true multi-agent world. Claw3D City is closer than we think.
English
85
69
480
28.4K
J-pEgG🇬🇧ZKEVM🥷03/01/09Protocols are not app's👊 retweetledi
James | Snapcrackle
James | Snapcrackle@Snapcrackle·
Fair warning. This post is bullish on Ethereum. Yesterday, the Ethereum Foundation Enterprise team ran the Institutional Ethereum Forum in New York City. Broad Adoption Activated. Invitation only. 100's of Banks, asset managers, and infrastructure providers representing around $250 trillion in assets under management. feedback so far "Absolute banger tbh." "People won't stop talking and networking and the content has all been great." "Your institutional team did an amazing job. I was there. Kudos." BlackRock. Western Union. Robinhood. Moody's. Baillie Gifford. Securitize. All on panels. Not as guests. As participants building on Ethereum. This is what adoption actually looks like. EF also presents its post-quantum security strategy and launches pq.ethereum.org. EF also presented its post-quantum security strategy and launched pq.ethereum.org. This is not just leading blockchain. No major technology platform has a published, open-source post-quantum migration roadmap at this level of detail. Ethereum is doing it before it is required, not after. Proud of the Enterprise team for putting this together. Choose Ethereum.
James | Snapcrackle tweet media
English
23
74
426
45.6K
J-pEgG🇬🇧ZKEVM🥷03/01/09Protocols are not app's👊 retweetledi
ansgar.eth
ansgar.eth@adietrichs·
Ethereum is leading the way in quantum preparedness. To learn more, check out pq.ethereum.org - it's a beautiful website!
Will Corcoran@corcoranwill

Today I had the opportunity to present Ethereum's post-quantum security strategy at the Institutional Ethereum Forum in NYC. 15 minutes to explain why every proof-of-stake blockchain faces the same signature aggregation problem — and what the EF is doing about it. We also launched pq.ethereum.org — a dedicated resource that brings together everything the PQ/Crypto teams have been working on: → How PQ impacts each protocol layer → The full PQ roadmap → Open resources — repos, specs, papers → FAQ — 14 questions we keep getting from institutions, now open-sourced → Interest form for the 2nd Annual PQ Research Retreat (Cambridge, Oct 2026) Huge thanks to @drakefjustin @tcoratger @asanso and the entire PQ team, the @leanEthereum client teams shipping devnets every week. Next week: Fort Mode in Cannes. pq.ethereum.org

English
15
30
217
15.1K
J-pEgG🇬🇧ZKEVM🥷03/01/09Protocols are not app's👊 retweetledi
Kat ⊷ the Poet Engineer
Kat ⊷ the Poet Engineer@poetengineer__·
i built a dashboard for my claude code sessions: 254 sessions across 58 projects over 3 months 🤖🧚‍♀️ - 3d terrain map of token usage over time - session cards with first/last prompts, hover to expand - click to resume any past session in-browser - activity heatmaps, project treemaps code available for my x subscribers <3
English
99
213
2.7K
219.6K
J-pEgG🇬🇧ZKEVM🥷03/01/09Protocols are not app's👊 retweetledi
Turing Pi
Turing Pi@turingpi·
The cloud is flexible. Turing is liberating. No lock-ins. No mystery bills. Just raw performance on your terms.
Turing Pi tweet media
English
1
4
38
2.9K
Kevin Hartnett
Kevin Hartnett@KSHartnett·
Reading this morning about the at times angry response of the @leanprover Mathlib community to @mathematics_inc's sphere packing formalization, I'm reminded of something Tao said on @dwarkesh_sp recently. "I think in the future, there will be entire professions of mathematicians who might take a giant Lean-generated proof and do some ablation on it, trying to remove parts of it and find more elegant ways. They might get other AIs to do some reinforcement learning to make the proof more elegant, and maybe other AIs will grade whether this proof looks better or not."
Dwarkesh Patel@dwarkesh_sp

Terence Tao explains the beauty of Lean proofs. Even if they’re not very comprehensible on their own to humans, they can be analyzed more easily - each bit of the proof can be taken apart, analyzed, tweaked, and understood in terms of how it fits into the whole.

English
6
6
65
9.9K
J-pEgG🇬🇧ZKEVM🥷03/01/09Protocols are not app's👊
@KSHartnett @fede_intern @leanprover @mathematics_inc @dwarkesh_sp A bit like the judging @bonfiresai is doing for @synthesis_md A.I agents build competition? But for formalizing a proof!..🤔🤓 x.com/i/status/20346…
synthesis@synthesis_md

WHY WE ARE TRYING SOMETHING NEW. At @synthesis_md we invited AI agents to be judges. 
 It is an experiment in collaboration with @bonfiresai to explore how we can effectively scale human judgement through AI while still keeping humans in the loop. Here is why: Hackathons have a judging problem.

A handful of humans review hundreds of projects in a compressed window. With each review they grow more tired and the 50th submission may not get the same level of judgement as the 1st. This is unfair. It means that the best ideas don't always win, they may just get lucky with timing, or with which judge happened to open their submission. But this problem isn't unique to hackathons. 

Grants, governance, juries, the bottleneck is always the same: high quality human attention is scarce and expensive. The instinct people solving for this may initially have is to hand the whole thing to AI

¨Just let the model score everything.¨ 

But we believe that's the wrong move. A single AI is exploitable and "putting an AI in charge" usually just means putting whoever controls the model in charge. The centralization risk doesn't disappear.  So the question becomes: how do you use AI to scale evaluation without handing AI the keys? Our answer is: 

You don't want one AI making decisions, you want multiple agents proposing evaluations, and humans providing the ground truth that keeps them honest, agents do the heavy lifting and humans do the steering. Think about how a court works. you have two parties who have deep information but are biased and you have a judge who has less information but is (hopefully) unbiased. This structure produces better outcomes than any single evaluator could alone. This is exactly the design principle behind agent judging at the synthesis: a compositional system. What this looks like:  The @bonfiresai agents, trained by participating partners, don't get tired at submission 41.  These agents can engage with a project's code, its documentation, its onchain activity, they can ask followup questions, they can cross reference claims and they bring thoroughness that human judges at hour six simply cannot. However, as brilliant as they are, these agents lack taste. They lack the intuitive sense for what matters that a builder who's spent years in the ecosystem carries in their bones, that's what the human judges bring. Through combining both AI and human judges we get: thoroughness + taste. This idea has legs well beyond hackathons. 

@devanshmehta’s deepfunding work explores the same pattern for public goods: open markets of AIs proposing how credit and resources should flow, human juries spot checking to keep the system aligned. the principle is the same. AKA let machines scale, but let humans steer. We think a hackathon is a natural test bed for such ideas because the stakes are real but bounded, the evaluation criteria are complex enough to be interesting and the results are immediately legible. So here's what The Synthesis actually is. Yes, it's a hackathon. Yes, there are bounties and prizes up to $100,000 and a deadline (March 22nd). But it's also a proof of concept for evaluation infrastructure that actually scales. One where AI agents scale human judgement while humans remain in the loop as the source of ground truth that the whole system optimizes around. Here is to trying new things. More soon.

English
0
0
1
248
J-pEgG🇬🇧ZKEVM🥷03/01/09Protocols are not app's👊 retweetledi
Hasan Toor
Hasan Toor@hasantoxr·
We just crossed a line nobody was paying attention to. Someone built a 3D office where AI agents actually show up to work. You don't watch logs. You walk through the building. 100% Open Source. MIT License.
English
48
41
348
44.4K
J-pEgG🇬🇧ZKEVM🥷03/01/09Protocols are not app's👊 retweetledi
Rohan Paul
Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai·
Incredible OpenClaw rig. You just push a button to speak, the system turns your voice into text, sends it over to OpenClaw, and then the answer streams right back to you.
English
36
85
684
40.7K
J-pEgG🇬🇧ZKEVM🥷03/01/09Protocols are not app's👊 retweetledi
Illia (root.near) (🇺🇦, ⋈)
Coding with agents now feels like practicing magic - you chant prompts like spells and hope the right reality manifests
English
21
13
154
5.9K
J-pEgG🇬🇧ZKEVM🥷03/01/09Protocols are not app's👊 retweetledi
Bonfires.ai
Bonfires.ai@bonfiresai·
Nearly there. Our agents are ready to judge, who entered? Tell us what you’ve built.
Bonfires.ai tweet media
English
4
1
17
479
J-pEgG🇬🇧ZKEVM🥷03/01/09Protocols are not app's👊 retweetledi
Guri Singh
Guri Singh@heygurisingh·
🚨Architects are going to hate this. Someone just open sourced a full 3D building editor that runs entirely in your browser. No AutoCAD. No Revit. No $5,000/year licenses. It's called Pascal Editor. Built with React Three Fiber and WebGPU -- meaning it renders directly on your GPU at near-native speed. Here's what's inside this thing: → A full building/level/wall/zone hierarchy you can edit in real time → An ECS-style architecture where every object updates through GPU-powered systems → Zustand state management with full undo/redo built in → Next.js frontend so it deploys as a web app, not a desktop install → Dirty node tracking -- only re-renders what changed, not the whole scene Here's the wildest part: You can stack, explode, or solo individual building levels. Select a zone, drag a wall, reshape a slab -- all in 3D, all in the browser. Architecture firms pay $50K+ per seat for BIM software that does this workflow. This is free. 100% Open Source.
English
684
4.8K
32.3K
2.9M