slav
1.6K posts


@SavitarICT For NY session, do you always use 243 or is 81 an option as well?
English
slav retweetledi

@Fadi_347 @iamdisplacement Back testing is easy. No waiting. No candle formation. Fast forward. No money on the line etc. everyone is good during back testing lol
English

@iamdisplacement How does that work dumbass ? Was your backtest a 100% win rate ?? fuck man i lose brain cells every time i read ICT traders bullshit.
English

Let’s break down ICT’s new PD Array – the BOLO (but not in a rage-bait way)Real talk – I’m an ICT alum too, but for the past few years I’ve been looking at his stuff through a Goldbach Time lens. I just find it gives way more actionable stuff than straight ICT concepts sometimes.Take this example. ICT calls the BOLO a rare setup and shows you the signatures to look for. But honest question: next time one pops up, would you actually spot it in real time? Be real with yourself. ICT can because it’s his thing. Most of us? Probably not. There just aren’t enough clear, actionable clues. Now flip it and look through the Goldbach lens the example, the low that creates the Rejection Block hits at 09:34 EST (15:34 Zurich Time). Boom – suddenly you have a solid time reference. So next time you’re hunting for a BOLO PD Array, you already know to zoom in around the 34/35 minute mark.Why is 35 minutes such a big deal? If you’ve read @hopiplaka
’s book, you know 35 is a consequent encroachment level – it’s basically where the current algorithm ends. In this case, it wrapped up the sell algorithm and kicked off the buy side.With that time clue + its meaning, spotting the BOLO suddenly feels way easier, right?Even though ICT said this thing is super rare, I checked Friday’s charts and a few BOLOs jumped out at me. In one of them, price clearly respected the 35-minute level. Some people might say “nah, that’s not a real BOLO” because it swept liquidity first (unlike the original example). So here’s the real question: do we have to follow ICT’s rules 100% strictly, or can we just buy/sell when the 35 high or low gets swept or a failure swing forms?Same vibe happened again at 09:34 Zurich (03:34 EST). Three “rare” BOLOs in one day? Coincidence… or nah? You decide.I’ve been using Goldbach Time to demystify a bunch of ICT concepts, and hopefully this helps some of you spot BOLOs faster instead of overthinking every signature.Want more breakdowns like this? Come check out the Goldbach Time space:tradeuniv.com/c/goldbach-tim…
ICT content is free.
But time? You can’t get that back.
My mentorship is $350.
You can easily make that money back with just a few good trades…
but the time you save learning to read these time-based edges? That’s priceless.



English

@TradedecisionFX @TheH0n3stTrader 60% win rate and depending on what ur risking, it can work
English

@TheH0n3stTrader 1:1 requires crazy win rate to be profitable.
English

@Shone1910 are u Serbian bro? Been messing around with ur indicators and just saw ur name lol
English

@c___f___b Haven't heard of qubic in ages.
This is still ongoing?
English

A major update of #Aigarth is approaching. We are transforming #Qubic into a giant "anthill" where every miner will be searching for shares in a coordinated manner (like ants for food).
But we are not trying to create #SwarmIntelligence, we are using it for something more ambitious.
English

















