John Wikamoto

492 posts

John Wikamoto banner
John Wikamoto

John Wikamoto

@CryptoWickss

staying afloat since 2017.

Thailand Katılım Kasım 2021
384 Takip Edilen36 Takipçiler
Adam Smith
Adam Smith@elcryptomaestro·
Someone explain how $riot is outperforming Bitcoin. Stocks are just so much more attractive right now, it's actually annoying.
English
1
0
0
194
John Wikamoto
John Wikamoto@CryptoWickss·
Don't poke the bear. Let her sleep.
English
0
0
3
9
John Wikamoto
John Wikamoto@CryptoWickss·
@RepHaridopolos I was curious about this too and thought this was a great explanation. x.com/bretas_erick/s…
Erick Bretas@bretas_erick

Since you asked an honest question here’s my attempt to honestly answer it: America’s wealth is driven primarily by high-value service industries such as banking, technology, and entertainment. Just think of companies like JPMorgan Chase, Netflix, or Amazon. These sectors not only dominate the domestic economy but also play a key role in U.S. exports. According to the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, in 2023 the services sector accounted for over 77% of the U.S. GDP, while manufacturing contributed approximately 11%. The U.S. is also the world’s largest exporter of services, with exports totaling more than $970 billion in 2023—covering financial services, software, cloud computing, intellectual property, and consulting. These are areas largely not subject to tariffs. In a sense, manufacturing is a game the U.S. has already outgrown, shifting its focus to more sophisticated and less labor-intensive sectors. This evolution allows the U.S. to leverage its comparative advantage in innovation and productivity, rather than competing on low-cost labor. Meanwhile, many other countries impose tariffs on U.S. agricultural and consumer goods because they lack competitiveness in fields like finance, technology, and professional services. By protecting these less efficient sectors, they attempt to shelter local jobs, but at the cost of higher consumer prices and economic inefficiencies. Americans are major consumers of agricultural and manufactured goods, not because these sectors dominate the economy, but because of the purchasing power generated by a highly productive, service-oriented economy. Imposing tariffs on imports may create the illusion of protecting domestic jobs, but in reality, it often leads to higher prices for consumers and little to no job creation, especially in a country operating near full employment (the U.S. unemployment rate was just 3.7% in early 2024). In short, tariffs are a blunt instrument that may be politically appealing but are economically inefficient in a modern, dynamic, service-led economy like the United States.

English
0
0
0
95
Congressman Mike Haridopolos
Congressman Mike Haridopolos@RepHaridopolos·
If tariffs are so bad, why are other countries’ tariffs so good? 🤔 Asking for a friend
English
4.2K
4.7K
41.6K
2.5M
John Wikamoto
John Wikamoto@CryptoWickss·
@BradRTorgersen It would make more sense if tariffs were sector specific and targeted due to the competitive advantage caused by low labor cost. From my understanding, they are reciprocal; if they lower their tariffs so will we. Jobs will stay where they are of the negotiation works.
English
1
0
1
876
Brad R. Torgersen
Brad R. Torgersen@BradRTorgersen·
If tariffs are a terrible idea and no sane politician would use them, why do 90% of America's "partner" nations use tariffs against America? I'm really trying to understand why an economic tool that's been used by other countries for a long time, is suddenly bad. 🫤
English
4.9K
5.9K
74.6K
10.5M
John Wikamoto
John Wikamoto@CryptoWickss·
@bretas_erick @BradRTorgersen This is one of the most thoughtful resorts I've seen to the tariff debate. No "orange man bad" appeals to emotion, just practical real world facts. We need more in the world like you. Thank you sir.
English
1
0
19
3.8K
Erick Bretas
Erick Bretas@bretas_erick·
Since you asked an honest question here’s my attempt to honestly answer it: America’s wealth is driven primarily by high-value service industries such as banking, technology, and entertainment. Just think of companies like JPMorgan Chase, Netflix, or Amazon. These sectors not only dominate the domestic economy but also play a key role in U.S. exports. According to the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, in 2023 the services sector accounted for over 77% of the U.S. GDP, while manufacturing contributed approximately 11%. The U.S. is also the world’s largest exporter of services, with exports totaling more than $970 billion in 2023—covering financial services, software, cloud computing, intellectual property, and consulting. These are areas largely not subject to tariffs. In a sense, manufacturing is a game the U.S. has already outgrown, shifting its focus to more sophisticated and less labor-intensive sectors. This evolution allows the U.S. to leverage its comparative advantage in innovation and productivity, rather than competing on low-cost labor. Meanwhile, many other countries impose tariffs on U.S. agricultural and consumer goods because they lack competitiveness in fields like finance, technology, and professional services. By protecting these less efficient sectors, they attempt to shelter local jobs, but at the cost of higher consumer prices and economic inefficiencies. Americans are major consumers of agricultural and manufactured goods, not because these sectors dominate the economy, but because of the purchasing power generated by a highly productive, service-oriented economy. Imposing tariffs on imports may create the illusion of protecting domestic jobs, but in reality, it often leads to higher prices for consumers and little to no job creation, especially in a country operating near full employment (the U.S. unemployment rate was just 3.7% in early 2024). In short, tariffs are a blunt instrument that may be politically appealing but are economically inefficient in a modern, dynamic, service-led economy like the United States.
English
68
146
2.4K
231.6K
Peter Schiff
Peter Schiff@PeterSchiff·
@Megan7560964546 Yes, but why does the U.S. government need a strategic reserve of XRP? There are a lot of valuable assets that the U.S. government doesn't hold in reserve. What's so special about XRP.
English
370
29
1.7K
165.5K
Peter Schiff
Peter Schiff@PeterSchiff·
I get the rationale for a Bitcoin reserve. I don't agree with it, but I get it. We have a gold reserve. Bitcoin is digital gold, which is better than analog gold. So let's create a Bitcoin reserve too. But what's the rationale for an XRP reserve? Why the hell would we need that?
English
7K
2.8K
33.2K
4.2M
John Wikamoto
John Wikamoto@CryptoWickss·
@elonmusk Your claim that judicial blocks on presidential orders signal "TYRANNY of the JUDICIARY" oversimplifies the U.S. system. Courts uphold checks and balances, not tyranny, by ensuring executive actions comply with the Constitution—crucial for democracy, not its demise.
English
0
0
14
574
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
If ANY judge ANYWHERE can block EVERY Presidential order EVERYWHERE, we do NOT have democracy, we have TYRANNY of the JUDICIARY.
English
54.3K
77.4K
433K
78.7M
John Wikamoto
John Wikamoto@CryptoWickss·
@DisrespectedThe Price inflation will occur whether or not the countries move operations to the US. Either through the increased taxes or increase moving/labor cost. I don't see any other way around it.
English
0
0
1
63
John Wikamoto
John Wikamoto@CryptoWickss·
damn, blusky is horrible
English
0
0
0
24
John Wikamoto
John Wikamoto@CryptoWickss·
@hippygecko Am I missing something? Did they say they were considering it?
English
1
0
0
4
mysticgecko
mysticgecko@hippygecko·
Can you imagine if $MSFT actually starts to buy #bitcoin!
mysticgecko tweet media
English
2
0
0
173
John Wikamoto
John Wikamoto@CryptoWickss·
@donalt On a high enough timeframe, everything is vertical.
English
5
0
0
66
DonAlt
DonAlt@DonAlt·
BTC going straight vertical ... on the low timeframes When high timeframe vertical?
English
127
48
1.5K
94.5K
John Wikamoto
John Wikamoto@CryptoWickss·
This is going to be an interesting week for $BTC 👀 Close above $66k and run, below and continue the soul crushing chop.
English
0
0
0
50
Daila
Daila@DailaX·
Thoughts and prayers 🤍
English
8
0
25
863
John Wikamoto retweetledi
Rekt Capital
Rekt Capital@rektcapital·
#BTC Bitcoin has experienced a rejection from the top of the Downtrending Channel (red) just like in the past (blue circles) It's essential Bitcoin Weekly Closes inside the red resistance to avoid a deeper rejection from here Still early on in the week Generally, we need to observe this Downtrending Channel resistance (red) for signs of weakening compared to previous rejections $BTC #Crypto #Bitcoin
Rekt Capital tweet media
Rekt Capital@rektcapital

#BTC Bitcoin is breaking out, right into the Downtrending Channel Top (red) Moment of truth $BTC #Crypto #Bitcoin

English
31
53
404
205.7K
John Wikamoto retweetledi
Chris Hoeger
Chris Hoeger@DataDInvesting·
If $SOFI were priced the same as their fintech competitors, they'd be trading above $21 today (based on gross profit). SoFi is above average in both growth and profitability from this list, so it should trade at an above average price. Still lots of room to run.
Chris Hoeger tweet media
English
22
34
432
38.7K
stock goat
stock goat@kylewhitegoat·
$SOFI I raised my price target from $14.50 to $16 ✅ due to "new streams of revenue" A.I banking/lending contracts 🚨 SMASHED $10 🐳📈🌘🤯
stock goat tweet media
English
18
24
388
20.2K
John Wikamoto
John Wikamoto@CryptoWickss·
Buying since sub $5 with an average cost of $7.30. If I'm comfortable with this breakout, I will likely be dip buying with a $14+ target. If the dips don't happen, I'm happy with my position. $SOFI
John Wikamoto tweet media
English
0
0
0
106
John Wikamoto retweetledi
stock goat
stock goat@kylewhitegoat·
$SOFI 🚨HOLY SHIT! 🚨 SOFI is hiring 37 Engineers right now!???..... WTF are they building in the lab????? #AI
stock goat tweet media
English
22
28
493
56.7K