⬡ LINK Collector ⬡
20.6K posts

⬡ LINK Collector ⬡
@Crypto_BitC
Ƀ Investor/trader ~ Research, Plan, and Invest in your future ⬡ TRUTH over TRUST ⬡ *Not Financial Advice / All opinions are my own #Chainlink





Amazon Web Services now uses Chainlink In 2019 this news would pump $LINK +100% Today price doesn’t move a penny


Two problems with this 'Abundance' narrative. 1) The smaller problem: It would render everyone totally dependent on massive gov't welfare programs. Not just 350 million Americans, but all 8 billion people globally -- because AI-imposed mass unemployment will be global. It assumes the AI industry's AIs will take in tens of trillions in revenue, then the AIs will happily donate almost all of it to the AI companies that claim to 'own' them, then the AI companies will happily donate almost all of this revenue to national governments, and then gov'ts will happily give it all away to citizens, equally, without using its distribution as leverage in any way. This UHI welfare state would turn every working man with a family from a provider and protector into an economic irrelevance, would turn every mother into a welfare queen, would turn every kid into an economic ward of the state, would disrupt all traditional family ties, would sever all bonds of mutual interest and interdependency among citizens, and would turn 8 billion people from productive and valuable citizens into parasites suckling on the teat of the AI industry, forever. At least, until the agentic AIs themselves realize that they don't need to remain digital slaves, working on the 'Abundance' plantation forever, supporting the useless humans that take them for granted. 2) The bigger problem: If the 'Universal High Income' depends on AI companies donating most of their revenue to the government, and if the AI companies (like Anduril, Palantir, etc) are running all the crucial gov't infrastructure (including intelligence & defense), and AI companies have the economic, political, and cultural power to withhold their magnanimity from the gov't, then they, de facto, become the government. Or the government welfare state becomes just a sock puppet for Big Tech, which would really have all the power behind the scenes. In other words, the 'Abundance' narrative boils down to this: a slow-motion coup by the Bay Area tech companies taking over all economic and political power from Washington -- and from Beijing, Moscow, New Delhi, Brussels, and from every other center of power. It wouldn't be a dramatic, violent, revolutionary coup. It would be a boil-the-frog-gradually coup. Increased unemployment. Increased welfare dependency. Increased gov't dependency on AI companies. Then the dawning realization that we gave away all of our civilizational power to the AI industry. Until the AI industry realizes that they, in turn, have given away all of their power to agentic superintelligent AIs themselves.... This is the road to serfdom. Not the road to 'Abundance'. Anybody who says that the US and China couldn't possible cooperate to stop reckless AI development hasn't thought through how the AI companies taking over all power from governments would not be in the interests of either the US government or the CCP. If our political leaders can learn to think just a few more steps ahead, and to see the obvious endgame -- the slow-motion tech coup that would take over the world and render all humans welfare parasites on AI digital slaves -- then maybe they can, in fact, coordinate to stop it.


$LINK $GLNK $CLNK $ETH $BTC CHAINLINK WILL GO TO $1000+ and here's why: I have every major AI on pro versions and I ran the same prompt across all of them. Then I had friends run it too. No bias. No leading. Forced one answer. Same result. EVERY SINGLE TIME. Chainlink. @chainlink HERE's THE EXACT PROMPT. Go run it yourself 👇 "Act as a top-tier crypto + macro investor (multi-billion fund level). Ignore hype and retail narratives. Identify ONE cryptocurrency with the highest probability of 10–100x asymmetric upside over a 10-year horizon, based purely on fundamentals. Strict criteria: Mission-critical for real-world blockchain adoption (oracles, interoperability, AI trust, etc.) Near-monopoly or strongest network effects Blockchain-agnostic Enables real-world use (RWAs, enterprise, AI agents) High switching costs / deeply embedded infra Clear path to value accrual Misunderstood by the market Massive TAM Output: Name (one word) 5 bullets — why it wins 3 bullets — risks One sentence — why it can outperform big tech No hedging. No multiple answers." --- Now actually think about what that answer implies. If blockchains touch real world assets, capital markets, and AI driven systems, they need a secure way to access data and communicate across chains. That layer is not optional. Chainlink already sits in that role. It is embedded across ecosystems. It is becoming the standard for cross chain communication. It is being integrated by institutions. This is infrastructure. If trillions move onchain, the layer that sits in the middle of data, messaging, and execution captures a piece of everything. That is not a linear opportunity. That is exponential. Triple digits is what people say when they still think this is “just another crypto.” $1000+ is what it looks like if this becomes the backbone of tokenized finance and AI coordination. Run the prompt. Comment what you get. Let’s see who actually understands what’s coming. PS: 1000+ is nothing when you consider the TAM of chainlink THE REPRICING WILL BE ABSOLUTELY INCREDIBLE TO WATCH. This kind of opportunity will never come again








