Dovahkiin

Understanding what bitcoin was built for can be overwhelming for many. It has importance, but not in the way the media portrays it as. It's worth an hour out of your time to listen to why bitcoin as a peer to peer electronic cash system is so important to our futures. #BSV

Trick or Treat 🎃 — Satoshi Clue Unmasked? Happy 17th Anniversary to Bitcoin's Whitepaper. white-paper.edgeone.app

The White House 'Digital Asset Report' explains exactly why bitcoin (in the form of BSV) is the obvious solution. It makes a clear case that it's all about efficiency. It even explains exactly why the current iteration of 'crypto' (on/off ramps) is inferior. Check the cope👇🏻

Shall we play a game?

Bitcoin: a peer to peer electronic cash system. No contest. #2-key-concepts-and-innovations" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">bsv-blockchain.github.io/teranode/topic… #bitcoin #bitcoinSV

@draken1721 @PeterSchiff @Cryptowarrior30 Invest in yourself then it becomes easy

What happens in 20 years when companies are mining precious metals from asteroids with robots? How much of bitcoins supply can be increased by mining operations in the galaxy? Still a hard cap bro. If I'm 20 should I invest in gold or Bitcoin? Remember when gold was illegal to own? And could be confiscated? And impossible to smuggle large amounts and obtain far I value for it if you could travel with it? I wonder what we could use instead that isn't so heavy and no one could confiscate (if properly protected)

Bitcoin is back above $110k, what's up with that?

@PeterSchiff Won’t be too long before it starts going the other way again. It’s like it’s almost on queue. You wind these guys up on purpose haha

Just going to leave this here... 👀 craigwright.net/wp-content/upl…

@bogdan_prunaru @MAGAVoice You have not offended me at all. Ivermectin existed many years before celebrities talked about it. People used it many years before any of this happened. But trolls going to troll. See ya doc

First of all: Sorry if I have offended you by not posting the source: I was thinking that maybe you would just google the information yourself rather than relying on a simple screenshot from WiKi. I may have been overestimating you. Second of all: Crypto investments are a separate theme, more like a hobby of mine. It has nothing to do with my professional expertise. Plus don’t flatter yourself, did not change my name because of you, I changed it because I want to extend the themes that I am going to cover here on X Third: I asked you where you studied medicine just to underline the fact that you have NO medical knowledge and thus your opinion for me does not matter. Fourth: I did not debunk that Ivermectin may not be efficient in cancer patients, but in my opinion in vitro studies are not enough. There must be further studies done before we start shoving pill down our throats just because some movie stars say so. The fact that people generally trust their word more than a doctors’ is concerning as to how media has influenced the general population. Fifth and last (not going to give you any more of my time, because I know its a waste): I will leave you with this: You say Big Pharma doesn’t want people to know about Ivermectin, right? Lets see one of the companies that produces Ivermectin Here is your f**king source. Take it with two sips of water! So much for anti-BigPharma…Enjoy and have a nice day merck.com/products/ drugwatch.com/manufacturers/…

Do you support Mel Gibson telling the truth about Ivermectin to millions of people with Joe Rogan ? YES or NO ?

@CoreyBayless @JQaoFern4ndez @RealAlexJones You’re just chatting breeze now.

@Cryptosilky1 @JQaoFern4ndez @RealAlexJones Experiences aren’t facts and aren’t the way… something works once, you must not discount the other variables. There was a guy once who ate peanut butter and somehow never got cancer… Peanut butter must prevent cancer 🤷‍♂️

EXCLUSIVE: Alex Jones Responds To Mel Gibson Exposing Documented Cancer Cures Being Suppressed By Big Pharma Plus, Mel Asks, "Why Is Fauci Still Walking Around?" » WATCH/SHARE THE LIVE X STREAM HERE: x.com/i/broadcasts/1…

So you post me some drivel on google without a source and claim that you studied Medicine in 3 separate locations globally but now sit on twitter as a crypto bro. Changed your name I see. Then ask me where I studied medicine when I didn’t say I did. Then you ask a question about dosage to try and sound smart when it’s done off weight. I think taking your own advice is probably better suited mr doctor. 😂

Also dose related….do you know the exact recommended dose for ivermectin, or do you take the same dose as a cattle? Studies have shown that during the covid perioad many people presented to the E.D with signs of poisoning from ivermectin… So my conclusion is this: Either stop spreading missinformation or don’t come to the ED if you have a medical issue. Call Mel Garbageson instead. He will give you treatment.

@bogdan_prunaru @MAGAVoice Died from taking ivermectin are you nuts. I’ve known hundreds of people take ivermectin over the last 15 years. Not one death funny that. Where did you study medicine?

As a person how studied Medicine for almost 14 years, I feel outraged how people trust someone with 0 medical experiance how just talks from rumors and internet BS info. Do you have any ideea during the COVID pandemic how many people still died even after taking Ivermectin?? No you don’t!! (I have seen them die roght before my eyes) Do you know biochemistry or pharmacology? Do you know how medicines work? How they bind to certain receptors? NO! Do you know how certain diseases work? What is the mechanism of action of each pathology? NO I find it insulting that everyone has an opinion on how medicine works and how big PHARMA is all in, and conspiracy theories how doctors are in on it too! There are years of studies done before anyone can say a certain drug works or not. There is a specific process that needs to be passed: In-vitro tests, in vivo tests and later on clinical trials. After all that we can draw the line and see what are the results. (if it works or not) Mel Gibson is a piece of S**t for even trying to influence the people! Every movie star trying to get more influence by promoting BS trends. Wake up people! Take care of your health, eat healthy, work out, screen yourself for certain diseases if you have certain concerns regarding your health and stay safe! Don’t shive pills that are not studied on human subjects extensively cause you might end up dead! Thank you for your time!

@JQaoFern4ndez @CoreyBayless @RealAlexJones The guys a shill. Been pushing on everyone’s comments basically how they are wrong and discounting their experiences.

@CoreyBayless @RealAlexJones Acidity. I am more than happy to back up with evidence, but only via email or telegram. Let me know by message if you would like for me tho share all the information I acquired over the years. 🙏

I still cannot believe they classed Madden as an independent expert. What a joke. I mean the word joke is becoming synonymous with this whole scenario. I am truly appalled at what I have witnessed and quite frankly embarrassed by the methodologies and application to deliberately railroad the truth. However, it is becoming a lot more obvious and a lot of people are starting to take notice.

If Mr Madden is the so-called expert, then this is no longer a courtroom issue—it’s a battlefield. And the weapon isn’t truth; it’s credibility wrapped in the thin armour of false authority. Mr Madden, the man with the title, the man whose opinions carry the weight of science, walks into the courtroom as if the very air bends to accommodate him. But the question isn’t about how he enters—it’s about whether he deserves to be there at all. Weinberg's critique cuts deep here. Experts like Madden—when they cannot back their claims with a foundation built on scientific reliability—become part of the machinery of injustice. They stand as figures of authority, their words laced with jargon, their findings delivered with an air of untouchable confidence. But what happens when their science crumbles under scrutiny? What happens when their testimony is nothing more than a castle built on sand? This is exactly the kind of scenario Weinberg rails against in IMM v The Queen. If Mr Madden’s expertise cannot withstand the hard questions, if it rests on methods that cannot be replicated or truths that have not been rigorously tested, then it is the trial judge’s duty to slam the gate shut. In Oz, Section 79 of the Evidence Act demands expertise, but without a layer of reliability to go with it, "expert" becomes just another word for "unquestioned." And the problem doesn’t stop with Mr Madden. It extends to the very structure that allows men like him to walk into courtrooms and speak as if their words are laws of nature. It’s a problem of power. Of deference. Of judges who have been neutered by decisions like IMM, where their ability to assess the reliability of expert evidence is undercut by procedural limits. It’s a problem of jurors, who see a man like Mr Madden and take his word as gospel because it’s easier to believe the confident than to wrestle with the uncertain. If Mr Madden’s testimony is at the heart of this complaint, then the rot runs deeper than his findings. It runs into the courtrooms, into the rules of evidence, into the very system that allows an "expert" to hide behind the sheen of their title without ever proving their worth. If his methods are flawed, if his conclusions are unsupported, then his presence in the courtroom is not just a failure of science—it’s a betrayal of justice. Weinberg’s solution is clear: reliability must be the gatekeeper. If Mr Madden’s science doesn’t hold up, then his words shouldn’t carry weight. Judges must take their place as the first line of defence, filtering out the junk before it poisons the trial. Section 137 of the Evidence Act gives them this power, the duty to weigh probative value against prejudice. And in cases like this, where the testimony of one man could tilt the scales of justice, that duty is everything. If Mr Madden stands as an expert, let him prove it. Not with the shine of his credentials, not with the weight of his reputation, but with the unshakable truth of his methods and findings. Anything less is not expertise—it’s theatre. And if the courts let it in, then justice becomes nothing more than a sideshow. Juries, judges, and junk science - expert evidence on trial. search.informit.org/doi/epdf/10.33…

@zuki_kizami @roman_de_fauvel @cregmaxwell @HBO Art of war

@roman_de_fauvel @cregmaxwell @HBO What are you smoking? Craig is not going to the supreme court.

If you haven't studied the original 1843 Champagne case by now you don't know what is going to occur in the next couple of years. It is constantly in court, even today, and the Champagne region consistently wins. BSV won because they stole the name and changed the process.

@noisymedia @LeeAndersonMP_ Didn’t think hard clearly

@LeeAndersonMP_ Where would you find the billions required Lee? Thought not.

Labour's Lies. Can you find anymore lies they told to pensioners?

We are with you Craig. It’s almost like everyone’s lost their minds to fundamentals. The world has got so far from any value, we’re living in a mockery of what society should be. Reading about these times in the past you think how could they ever be like this. Now we know. Greed dictates and they will do everything to stop interference. But, for them everything is temporary they just don’t see it yet for greed is also blind.

And so, what we are witnessing is the slow, deliberate death of innovation, buried beneath layers of legal sophistry and corporate doublespeak. It is not the so-called "patent trolls" that threaten the future of progress—it is these entities, these litigation machines, that have no purpose other than to shield the mediocre from the consequences of their own inability to create.

Let us, then, examine the true nature of entities like Unified Patents LLC and COPA through the lens of reason, not deception. These organizations cloak themselves in the rhetoric of justice, all while perpetuating an insidious game that serves not the innovator, but the corporate giants that feed off the ideas of others. They masquerade as defenders of intellectual property, but what they are, in essence, is the antithesis of that. They stand not for the mind that creates but for the bureaucracy that seeks to enslave it.

@CsTominaga Glad to hear you are in a good place and keeping the consistency.

The journey requires patience and persistence, as the resolution lies just beyond the horizon. Each action taken, each paper submitted, is a step closer to the ultimate goal. This is the work that must be done, and it will be done -one day, one document at a time.

Since 2015, I have walked a path defined by obligations and expectations, dictated by the will of others. For years, my steps were not my own; my choices were shaped by the needs, desires, and demands of those around me. I was tethered to a system that sought to extract my energy, time, and spirit, leaving little room for my own autonomy.

One very life-changing observation of mine was noticing that people who are okay with being disliked don't really lose out on anything significant in life, either.

@gamaroff Love this. Well written and clear. Going to be fun the next few years as we drag everyone kicking and screaming to a brand new world that focuses on global inclusion using scale, micropayments, privacy and data protection.

/9 Real change doesn’t come from shortcuts. It comes from sticking to the original #bitcoin vision, building something that lasts, and understanding that true wealth is about empowering people and communities.

/8 By building scalable, secure systems accessible to all, we can create a #bitcoin network that truly transforms lives, empowering billions, not just a fortunate few.