Ross Anderson

6.4K posts

Ross Anderson banner
Ross Anderson

Ross Anderson

@Cure_The_CDC

Physicist -Interfaith Interpreter - Friend -

Unified Global Entity - Guest Katılım Nisan 2022
4.3K Takip Edilen1K Takipçiler
Ross Anderson
Ross Anderson@Cure_The_CDC·
@StartsWithABang I'm trying to understand the distinction in the t=0 singularity condition, vs. observed evolution from a t=0=now, slice of Friedmann. Is there any reason this derivation is invalid under your assumptions? youtu.be/6NZ0pc8AI0Q
YouTube video
YouTube
Ross Anderson tweet media
English
1
0
0
15
Ethan Siegel
Ethan Siegel@StartsWithABang·
@Cure_The_CDC The value of t is irrelevant. We usually call it "t_0" (t today, to correspond with a today), but it's completely arbitrary. t=0 holds no special meaning, particularly in a Universe with an inflationary early phase.
English
1
0
1
12
Ethan Siegel
Ethan Siegel@StartsWithABang·
The Universe has changed by the time you finish this sentence It takes just over three seconds to read a typical sentence. In that tiny flash of time, the Universe has changed in tiny but mighty ways. On cosmic timescales, that really adds up! bigthink.com/starts-with-a-…
English
7
10
26
995
Ross Anderson
Ross Anderson@Cure_The_CDC·
Eternal & Unchanging Universe, Seems a Bit Simplistic. Forcing t=0=Now, De Sitter & Einstein are Both Correct. An Open Minded Assumption of Space & Time's Origin, is Required to Address G, Lambda Crisis & H_0 Tension. Initial Singularity vs. Unending, Evolutionary Dynamics= Time.
Quanta Magazine@QuantaMagazine

Einstein believed in an eternal and unchanging universe. But the Dutch physicist Willem de Sitter was more open-minded. He realized that an evolving universe was a natural consequence of Einstein’s theory. quantamagazine.org/in-expanding-d…

English
0
0
1
41
Ethan Siegel
Ethan Siegel@StartsWithABang·
@Cure_The_CDC Yes we know how to predict the cooling rate over time; because we know how "a" (the scale factor) evolves dependent on what's in the Universe as a function of time, and "a" relative to "a_0" ("a" today) determines the temperature change in the future.
English
1
0
1
28
Prof. Lee Cronin
Prof. Lee Cronin@leecronin·
I’m right on AI because I understand what I don’t know. The people certain I’m wrong however are …
English
22
3
51
7.5K
Ross Anderson
Ross Anderson@Cure_The_CDC·
So, watched this video: "How Could We Possibly Know the Universe Had a Beginning?" Sad to report, I cannot prove @PhysicsExplain1 "is correct". But, tomorrow, I will be laying out the logarithmic roots of the G & Lambda derivations, with Baryonic Acoustic Oscillation Predictions.
Ross Anderson tweet mediaRoss Anderson tweet mediaRoss Anderson tweet media
English
1
0
1
56
Ross Anderson
Ross Anderson@Cure_The_CDC·
Proving Dr. Paul Wilhelm Is Correct. @drxwilhelm x.com/i/grok/share/d…
Dr. Paul Wilhelm | Advanced Rediscovery@drxwilhelm

🌌 In five dimensions, the vector potential IS gravity. Kaluza showed in 1921 that extending spacetime from four to five dimensions makes the electromagnetic four-potential Aμ appear as off-diagonal components of the five-dimensional metric tensor g₅μ. The metric tensor. The object that defines the geometry of spacetime in general relativity. The vector potential is literally a piece of the gravitational field in one extra dimension. In this formulation, gauge transformations ARE coordinate transformations in the fifth dimension. Electric charge IS momentum in the fifth dimension. Klein extended this in 1926 by compactifying the fifth dimension to Planck-scale radius, making it unobservable while preserving its physical effects. Two of the deepest theories in physics become one theory in five dimensions. The consequence for the deletion thesis: when you gauge-fix the electromagnetic potentials, you are constraining gravitational degrees of freedom in the Kaluza-Klein framework. Deleting degrees of freedom from Aμ simultaneously deletes components of the higher-dimensional gravitational field. The superpotential formulation makes this precise: the gravitational potential Φg is related to ∇·A. Precisely the term the Lorenz gauge eliminates. If ∇·A carries gravitational information, then gauge-fixing electromagnetism simultaneously hides gravitational physics. Li and Torr showed that in a superconductor, the same Cooper pair condensate that physically fixes A (London gauge) may simultaneously fix the gravitational vector potential Ag. The electromagnetic-gravitational bridge may be a physical coupling mediated by the same condensate. The GEM analogy has experimental confirmation: Gravity Probe B measured frame-dragging at 37.2 ± 7.2 milliarcseconds per year. Moving mass generates a gravitational analogue of the magnetic vector potential. Section 4.10 of my paper "The Deleted Degrees of Freedom" develops the full Kaluza-Klein argument and the superconductor bridge. Section 5.3 covers gravitational engineering implications. Free. Pinned on my profile.

English
1
0
2
57
Science without the gobbledygook
The Boltzmann brain hypothesis suggests a fully formed brain randomly appearing in space is more likely than the Big Bang. A recent physics paper found it and the second law of thermodynamics equally plausible. @skdh has a look. youtu.be/x5sR5sGi6kU
YouTube video
YouTube
English
4
4
19
1.6K
Ross Anderson
Ross Anderson@Cure_The_CDC·
@Kali_fissure , it deleted your tag when I posted this, but, I thought it was cool that you were putting together some explainers. I Got the coding figured out to make these neat @3blue1brown style animations, & Might try to enter @TOEwithCurt CORE1, Advanced Research Exposition.
English
0
0
3
62