Sabitlenmiş Tweet
YouTube
YouTube
QME
Paul Dean Charlton 2
17.1K posts
Paul Dean Charlton 2
@KiltedWeirdo
Be the change you want in the world. (Past, Present, Future)=(electron, proton, neutron)= (2^0, 2^1, 2^1+2^0) 2^2=gravity! #PiratesOfPhysics
Oklahoma Katılım Eylül 2022
356 Takip Edilen358 Takipçiler
@MFTphysics @Geezer185 @Cure_The_CDC @Kali_fissure also, we have a theme song (lmfao):
drive.google.com/file/d/1lYs2Zc…
English
@MFTphysics @Geezer185 @Cure_The_CDC @Kali_fissure and above all else, we seek the best views on truth thinking deeply can award.
English
Topological correction and recovery in Möbius Field Theory.
The Klein bottle has TWO fundamental loops — not one.
Loop a (orientable): holonomy e^(2πi/3) — scalar, Z3, generates three generations. Koide lives here.
Loop b (orientation-reversing): holonomy iγ₅ — Clifford, Z2. One traversal immediately splits left from right chirality.
These act on separate spaces. No conflict.
The fundamental group relation bab⁻¹ = a⁻¹ connects them: loop b swaps generations 2 and 3, leaving generation 1 as the algebraic fixed point. First generation = stable matter because it cannot be swapped.
Full Z6: LCM(3,2) = 6 traversals for complete return.
Earlier today we used one combined Clifford operator for both loops. Wrong. Now corrected.
The Koide formula, chirality mechanism, and first generation theorem all survive — on a cleaner foundation.
English
@NoFilterSkin NO, I DIDN'T NOT YET.
wait, wrong Paul. lmfao
about the not-yet and religion thing. time=god as religion.
all things are within time, time plays its part in all things.
omni-knowing, omni-seeing, omni-being.
yes, that includes us, as fractal parts of his whole.
English
@Geezer185 @MFTphysics @Kali_fissure @martinreyn59150 @ArchMic44660667 @Cure_The_CDC @55DAVID22 Hi nick. my name is paul. if you'd like access to these documents to see if you can further your research orientation, let me know. i'll send them to you no problem. just mark what comes from me, as being found by me. it is my belief thats where our ownership ends.
English
@Geezer185 @MFTphysics @Kali_fissure @martinreyn59150 @ArchMic44660667 @Cure_The_CDC @55DAVID22 Claude on initial inspection.
i think i have math that can help with accuracy.
English
Do I know you enough to need to care what you think
Will your thoughts on me or my actions actually effect my life or you past you having had them
Does your aggression to me being me, have similar little effect, or does it grow to what you give into, as far as your aggressiveness
English
@KiltedWeirdo @Geezer185 @Cure_The_CDC @55DAVID22 @Kali_fissure @ArchMic44660667 @AmdredLambda @stephen_wolfram 2 squares shrinking; 6 spheres, compressing top to bottom and dilating equatorially; expansion cycle is Moment, hNms^2, about centroid of tesseract , Sm^4, the entropic limit of -ve expansion, which expresses as +temp pulse through Aethereal Elasticicity to CMB Universal Boundary
English
@Cure_The_CDC @KiltedWeirdo @martinreyn59150 @55DAVID22 @Kali_fissure @ArchMic44660667 @AmdredLambda @grok @stephen_wolfram V7.7.7 - Chapter 16 adds Paul's older new work ☠️
x.com/i/grok/share/d…
English
@Dado50449061 @StuartHameroff Anti matter to matter duality as empathy to consciousness through a^2+b^2=c^2. Same as energy to mass duality.
Why overcomplicate it?
Oh to determine the outcome to a non-thinking cosmos.
Thinking is calculation. The universe calculates things ✔️
No more needed
English
The golden ratio cannot create consciousness because its second-order algebra does not contain the complex phase needed to store quantum information, and its topology cannot close a 13-node lattice without irrational escape; the true topological stability of microtubules is a native property of the third-order unimodular algebra (eta).
Regards.
English
@4gravitons @QuantaMagazine Its also a fractal/whole as over-unity to container normalization. y((x/x)/x)/x where y=x+x/x is fractal/whole, where fractal is more than the whole. (expansion moment)
English
@4gravitons @QuantaMagazine particle mass is our first observable. we can only infer what is under our observable limit.
[protium, deuterium, helium]-> [hydrogen, helium, neon]
-> [helium, neon, argon]
krypton: 2(argon)
xenon: 3(argon)
radon: ?
English
Physicists of X! I'm writing a piece for @QuantaMagazine : "What is Mass?" a collection of different perspectives on mass in physics, in the vein of Natalie Wolchover's "What is a Particle?" piece a few years back. If you've got a cool perspective to share, send me a message!
English
@LucaAmb Because it's unbiased intelligence when built right. No one is building them without bias
English
Why do people think that LLM are somehow supposed to give you tre truth??
We are trying to replicate intelligence here, not the oracle of delphi
Valerio Capraro@ValerioCapraro
The most powerful thing I’ve learned this week: When Copernicus introduced heliocentric theory — the Sun at the centre of the solar system — it actually fit the astronomical data worse than geocentric theory. Ptolemaic geocentric theory had been refined for more than a millennium, with astronomers adding epicycles, deferents, and other adjustments to make it match the observations available at the time. By contrast, heliocentric theory was new, and Copernicus assumed circular orbits, which made its predictions very inaccurate. It took almost a century for Kepler to realise that planetary orbits are not circular, but elliptical. So heliocentric theory was closer to the true structure of the world than geocentric theory, yet it fit the data worse. Here’s the powerful message: sometimes, to get closer to the truth, you first have to move away from what best fits the data. And this is why gradient descent — the basic optimisation procedure underlying modern AI models — is fundamentally limited: it pushes models to better fit the data they see. But fitting data is not the same thing as discovering truth. If medieval astronomers had had LLMs, we would still believe that Mars orbits the Earth along some crazy path.
English
@Philip_Goff @seanmcarroll Sir. May I ask a question? in your book, why, did you also ask its reciprocal, why not?
English
I've enjoyed respectful & constructive disagreement with @seanmcarroll on this, e.g. in his recent response to my arguments. Much more grown up that the "you're a dumb idiot" stuff evidenced in this tweet.
preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2025/1…
Erik Svensson@EvolOdonata
The fine-tuning argument for the existence of God is really bad. Watch physicist @seanmcarroll debunk this incredibly weak argument here: youtu.be/gRp0ent1Z0A?is…
English
@BenjaminYumi8 @skdh you don't need double slit to see it. mathematically speaking, E=mc^2 is simulation theory.
E= off = open
m= on = closed.
open is to the rest of unobservable reality.
English
if you were to try and formulate this idea mathematically, you would realize that it's meaningless blather. that's why physicists use maths.
x.com/InterstellarUA…
Interstellar@InterstellarUAP
🚨 Simulation Theory: The Double Slit Experiment proves particles act like waves until observed then they snap into particles. What if our reality only "renders" when we're looking, just like a video game optimizing resources? Check out this episode from The Why Files breaking it down, tying it to Simulation Theory. Are we in a sim? This could be the key to unlocking the true nature of existence! The Why Files video did a great job on explaining the Double Slit Experiment & Simulation Theory What do YOU think—real or rendered? Drop your thoughts below!
English
@martinmbauer almost. see that's the issue. computers must run within the laws of physics.
it is a direct parent (physics) child (computer science) relationship.
math would be the parent of physics.
because to exist, is to have something to measure, creating measurement by comparison.
English
Physics and computer science is almost a parent-child relationship. That's why many computer scientists have it in their DNA, whether they realise it or not
Lev Reyzin@lreyzin
The 2024 Nobel Prize in physics went to a computer scientist. Now, in turn, the 2025 Turing Award was given to a physicist!
English
@martinmbauer also where c=0, E=c within E=mc^2. Pre light expansion. mass as identity, even in iota's.
English
@martinmbauer except it does, where E=0 if m=1, when E=mc^2.
English
The computer scientist understands how closely simulations can resemble everyday reality, the physicist understands that the Universe, on closer inspection, does not
Elon Musk@elonmusk
I had dinner once with a top physicist and a top computer scientist and asked what they thought the probability was that we were in a simulation. They answered simultaneously at 0% and 100% respectively. It was like a double-slit experiment, but with humans.
English