CyprusHodl🇨🇾

@RadarHits Haven't you imperialists done enough damage to Cyprus over the decades?

@dominic_w Got marketing?... or are all your past promises lies?

a diagram can also be a screenshot of an existing website, say

caffeine.ai ☕️🧠 has gone multi-modal :) Now you can upload diagrams and docs to explain how you want your apps and websites on the Internet Computer (ICP) to work 💥 More powerful new features coming soon

@dominic_w Is this your idea of marketing that you promised? If so try again. ICP will not make it past this cycle if you don't and it will be your fault!

Chat to create apps/websites on... Lovable: – SaaS platform (vendor lock-in) Replit: – traditional tech stacks (confgurable) Caffeine: – open tech stack on public cloud (ICP) – 1st programming-language for AI – guarantees: — app security & resilience — no data loss on updates

@dominic_w @EmanAbio You have no idea wtf you're talking about. You shilled to VCs more than 99% of any token and the VCs ripped the faces off of retail and now you have the audacity to criticize Arabs? ... Like wtf! Racist much?!

@EmanAbio Real people. At least we're not backed by shady middle eastern money that supports our price with treasury games. Sui is a fake market with paid developers. Take away your backing and you're not much

In just 2 years #Sui dev growth is outpacing chains that have been here for much much longer. Higher!!

@aaronbennett If

When gold pulls back we’ll see a rotation of that capital into bitcoin.

@ChazzonKe @CelsiusNetwork @IonicDigital 🙏

I've never been shy about my opinion about matters involved with @CelsiusNetwork and @IonicDigital. Some folks seem to forget how this started and why I continue to engage with the victims and advocate for them even with my limited voice. This is a massive post. But figured I'd spell it all out. In 2022 I was asked to help a adhoc group clean, scrub, and make usable the PDF Celsius gave to the adhocs for accounts and balances containing over 14,700+ pages of intermingled, merged, and basically unreadable data. I spent weeks creating a custom powershell script that converted that into a usable, functional data base for the adhoc, which I also shared with other groups pursuing their own adhoc claims. This master document became the basis for which @devDapps used create the interactable website, which allowed everyone free and open access to the data I cleaned for victims, which @CelsiusNetwork never actually provided a usable document to victims till even the bitter end. I'll forever be grateful for Daps putting the data I scrubbed to such use for victims. Over the duration of the Ch.11 I've provided aid and assistance to hundreds of victims directly. To help determine preference exposure long before the LOC or the UCC sent out collection letters so they could financially prepare almost a year in advance. Helped them trace transactions, and balance history, helped them collect their data for taxes, etc. Also during the Ch.11 I worked diligently to provide clean and accurate reporting on the financial statements, offering condensed and easy to understand explanations for those who didn't speak English well, and at times spent hours discussing matters through translation tools to help folks understand the situation as it involved them. I provided consistent reporting on their BTC mining, production reports, estimates on values, and estimated future revenues. Consistently landing well within industry standard margin of error or better. I provided adhocs and pro-se insight and data for their filings directly or was used indirectly. Consistently raising issues about false or misleading statements by @CelsiusNetwork throughout the Ch.11. Primarily on cost basis being inaccurate, energy rates being falsified, and a host of other glaring omissions. The Examiner report, which I covered on release validated those concerns I had, proving without a shred of doubt as she provided the invoices that Celsius mining was in-fact paying substantially over their reported cost basis by an order of magnitude. I've spent months reviewing every plan or revised plan the UCC and Celsius provided and which eventually got approved by a vote. I laid out substantial concerns about profitability, leadership structure, operational issues, environment / permit issues, and the absurd revenue/profit projections which had been so outlandish to be criminal. In Aug of 2023, They laid out this plan summary, and I blasted them for thinking the network hashrate was going to be just 307 EH/S in Sept 2024, and 374 in Sept 2025. It was grossly negligent and substantially misaligned the estimates which anyone on twitter in crypto could have spotted. Their Revenue estimates for Sept 2024 off by just -$175 million and their Sept 2025 Estimate was off by -$327 million. All glaring issues I raised substantial concerns about, and provided substantial evidence supporting my stance and opinion. But when those concerns got brought up in court the UCC led by Scott & Tom (Now board members) and Celsius got Judge Glenn to slam down on objections and push this through. Shocking nobody who actually follows me, my concerns for @IonicDigital have landed basically spot on. Don't even get me started on these revenue estimates, which mind you didn't include selling out the only major asset one just spent $100 million building, only for it to be gutted, shredded, and converted into a new facility. But they won't even hit the FY24 best case based on pure revenue play. I've helped out hundreds, and potentially thousands understand the process. As is always the case, a few loudmouths come out, claim I am negative, and tell me to fuck off. But here is the rub. I've listened to victims losing their homes, losing loved ones, losing retirements, and been a shoulder to lean on. Yes, I don't mince my words, and yes I can be brash and blunt. However; I have not, and will never blow smoke up your ass. The victims of @CelsiusNetwork have already suffered because of unsupported puffery causing their losses, they've suffered from the UCC providing unrealistic, and absurdly inaccurate estimates about what @IonicDigital would be in FY24, FY25, etc, and ya'll still can't trade a single share. So yea, I am going to stay around. Cause there are very few people involved who will fight for your voices to be heard, to share your concerns, and to continue to fight for transparency, accountability, and your rights. To the recent person who told me to fuck off and leave. Maybe, you should have used your platform of 23+ thousand followers to fight for your rights. Imagine having just 17 posts over 3 years discussing Celsius, and 2 since 2025 discussing Ionic (One telling me to fuck off). And yet telling me who's put substantially more effort into advocating for victims rights, that I should leave. If one does not actually care enough to fight for themselves, why should they feel entitled to tell someone who is to leave?

@bkclaims Good take. Emphasis on if the DAT takes on leverage, which they shouldn't, otherwise bankruptcy can't happen.

Prediction: When DATs use Section 351 exchanges, they’re effectively taking on the tax liability. So in a bear market, if there are call-aways or margin calls, those can trigger huge tax liabilities. When the DATs then have to sell their BTC, TON, ORB, NEAR, etc., it could push them into bankruptcy.

@dominic_w @caffeineai How about you under promise and over deliver for once! Try that for a change!

If you're interested in self-writing apps (vibe coding that's chat only) and related AI tech, don't forget to follow @caffeineai ☕️ Big things coming.

@ChazzonKe @IonicDigital Wouldn't have expected anything less from the gift that is @IonicDigital.

Fun fact while I am looking over the @IonicDigital audit. During FY24 they mined 1,767.03 BTC at an average reward value of $68,289 each. Their cost of revenue (Electricity) was $90.486 Million or $51, 208 per BTC mined. That in turn means after electricity, they only earned $17,081 per BTC reward. For a total of $30.182 million after electricity expenses. Here is the kicker, During FY24 @IonicDigital had a SG&A expense (Salary etc) of $40.6 Million. But don't worry, they are cooking the books with FASB and other thus far interesting accounting methods.

@icpwillrule @dominic_w @caffeineai There is no plan that is the plan!

@dominic_w Give us your marketing plan for $ICP and @caffeineai

RANKED: traditional tech stack "self-writing capable" platforms ICP must beat, by enabling the creation of superior production apps that are secure, safe, and sovereign, through conversational chat: 1. Lovable (easy 1st) 2. Base44 (wild card!) 3. Replit (chat only is hard)

@dominic_w Interesting how you don't believe in market markers, don't believe in influences or marketing yet you continuously come here and hype your coin because it is evident to everyone that ICP is becoming more ans more irrelevant every day

@dominic_w You have dropped the ball on ICP marketing and now are using this to excuse your incompetence all the while selling your soul to VCs who then turned around and dumped on retail like Dfinity continues to do multiple times every week. CMC drop to 44 tells you all you need to know.

@dominic_w Less than 1% of web3 know because Dfinity has done a horrible job at marketing. Put some money to work getting this known.

Historically, DIRECT EXPERIENCE of blockchain technology has been limited to TOKENS IN WALLETS, ways to swap tokens, and staking and yield-generation services. Since blockchain technology is intangible, TOKEN NARRATIVES have determined what people have bought into... 🧵

Less than 1% of Web3 knows this: ICP remains the ONLY blockchain a) running apps onchain vs ON CLOUD with just a token onchain, b) running REAL decentralized AI, and c) providing a unique specialized tech stack where AI can build apps SOLO. But this is about to CHANGE... 🔴🧵

@aaronbennett Not happening without Congressional approval and certainly not at a premium (currently at 34%)

Some think the US will purchase $MSTR and that’s how they’ll add to their bitcoin stack. I highly doubt it but is there any reason this could be their strategy?

@realrephy @GWAM_Abbate

We were promised change. We were promised transparency. We were promised regular communications. We were promised a complete audit. We were promised a new CEO and CFO. Many of us petitioned for you to be on the board and honestly, expected a change in the way we are kept in the dark and it feels like it’s just the same old, same old. A little disheartening to say the least. How about a real shareholders meeting to brief us on where we are as a whole. This includes first and foremost the liquidity factor and those options Ionic talks about. Go over the completed audit with us and where Ionic can improve their operations. Give us your outlook on the remaining of the year goals and what to look forward to in 2026. You know our story and you see how we rallied for you. Please don’t disappear and disappoint us now. ✌️

I am honored to be serving the Celsius creditors / Ionic shareholders. businesswire.com/news/home/2025…

@odinsjudgement @CbaColibri @CelsiusFacts Doesn't even matter if Celsius said that. This is this exact preferential behavior that clawbacks are supposed to level. It should all come back to the estate and get redistributed just like everyone else. @paoloardoino.... You know what to so!

@CbaColibri @CelsiusFacts Where is their proof that celsius said to liquidate? Oral confirmation ? smh yeah right

#Tether answer to #Celsius amended complaint. Will download tomorrow. @CelsiusFacts

😂😂😂😂😂😂 ☠️☠️☠️☠️

@dominic_w Seriously Dom? .. like wtf! .. please spend more time on proper marketing instead of this raff!

As the Motoko language marches forward, with another EOP upgrade coming, and more features unleashing ICP as the ultimate stack for AI that builds, glad to see the brand keeps moving too ❤️

@mcagney ICP is a already been doing this.

Ask most engineers and they'll tell you building on blockchain is a pain. It's slow, unwieldy and by its immutable nature, unforgiving. But it has a single superpower: the ability to displace trusth with truth. This power will ultimately disrupt all of financial services. Private or permissioned blockchains can't do this. Anyone pushing them is akin to a snake oil salesman of yore. This will drive a lot of controversy, but I feel the same way about analog assets on chain. IBM can't track your strawberry's on blockchain, because blockchain can't see. Unless it's a native digital asset, you have to TRUST an oracle. The point of blockchain is to trust no one.

@paoloardoino @satoshigallery Sign an agreement to restore the 39,500 btc of insider preference you took from Celsius creditors.

Sign the petition to restore the @satoshigallery 's Satoshi statue in Lugano 🙏