D.Berry 🐎♐️🍊🍊🍊
25.8K posts
D.Berry 🐎♐️🍊🍊🍊
@DBerry88
#GG33 #GRINBERG2028 #CUE #FREEGG33 #OneOfOnes #CueLifetime
#GG33 Katılım Nisan 2009
354 Takip Edilen455 Takipçiler
This man is so cruel, would love to interview him to get to the bottom of this ☝🏽
Ashlar@RealAshlar
This Woman Is Going Viral Online After Sharing Details About Her Recent Date. Thoughts??
English
D.Berry 🐎♐️🍊🍊🍊 retweetledi
D.Berry 🐎♐️🍊🍊🍊 retweetledi
I've gotten thousands of death threats from stupid black people the past week.
So to all the blacks that want to "slide" on me, or "drop my lo" here is your chance!
Meet me this Sunday at 12:00pm EST.
The address is:
3050 NW 183rd St, Miami Gardens, FL 33056
Before we duel, I'm going to give you a copy of the book "The Cat In The Hat".
If you can read 2 pages uninterrupted, without sounding it out or using your index finger to focus on each sentence we can engage in combat.
I know this can be annoying, but beating up retards is a crime in Florida (Section 825.102 – Abuse or Neglect of Disabled or Elderly Person).
Therefore, I have to ensure you're mentally competent first, since coming to fight a podcaster over tweets is pretty fucking retarded.
Comment "monkey" below and I'll DM you my number to coordinate.
I look forward to meeting all of you! 🤗
English
D.Berry 🐎♐️🍊🍊🍊 retweetledi
Day by day, @ChudTheBuilder’s self-defense case strengthens under Tennessee law (TCA § 39-11-611 Stand Your Ground).
Joshua Luvv’s own Facebook posts prove he wanted to confront and fight Chud to launch his “Twitch career.”
This directly corroborates multiple witnesses who saw the livestream before it was removed from the streaming service Pumpfun:
Luvv followed Chud, threw the first punch, and Chud never called him the n-word or provoked physical violence.
On top of that, the criminal complaint makes zero mention of Chud instigating or provoking the fight.
Instead, the complaint mentions that Chud took a “bladed stance” and reached for his firearm.
A bladed stance is a recognized defensive posture in firearms training.
It is not illegal to reach for a weapon when you have reason to believe someone is trying to cause you imminent serious bodily injury or death.
This supports a reasonable fear of the imminent unlawful force that Luvv initiated.
The Pumpfun livestream footage was subpoenaed.
The full video will likely confirm the self-defense claim.
αΩ - OPERATION FREE DALTON 'Chud the Builder'@ArchetypeTheory
Evidence Exonerating "Chud the Builder" discovered: (by friend of family) Screenshots showing premeditation by Joshua Luvv to fight Dalton to launch his "twitch streaming." Joshua Fox / Joshua Luvv Facebook comments from Jan 10, 2026 (18 weeks before the Eatherly incident) Direct quotes from Fox's own account, in a thread with users "Kudo Menace" and "Bishop Reemo Yeezy": • Fox: "I been hopping to run into the chud mf but he don't be on this side of town. But outside of him ima call them a bitch and go about my day 😂😂😂" • Kudo Menace (responding): "chud just trolling us for a reaction. Don't let him bother you either. I don't think he's really racist anyway. Just click bait." • Fox: "trying to get some traction on my end so when I start my twitch I got a little fan base 😂😂😂" • Fox: "oh he don't bother me I just wanna fight 😂😂😂" • Bishop Reemo Yeezy: "on the internet correct. In person? Neutralizing the threat" (followed by a "NO PROBLEM…" meme image) What this establishes: • Fox publicly stated his intent to physically seek out "the chud" months before the incident • Even his own friend characterized the target as "just click bait" and "not really racist" • Fox's stated motivation was Twitch traction and a fan base, not a response to any actual harm • Fox explicitly said "I just wanna fight" • This is documented premeditation. The encounter at the Montgomery County Courthouse was not a chance escalation. It was the outcome Fox had been openly telling people he wanted.
English
Chud is has a valid self defense claim. The usual suspects are about to chimp out now 😂🫵🏽🐒
Andrew Branca Show@TheBrancaShow
WHAT A GREAT DAY FOR DALTON EATHERLY! TLDR: The State's case against Eatherly appears to be utterly lacking in ANY LEGAL MERIT WHATEVER, based upon what appears to be the official Affidavit of Complaint just made public (attached). This in a case in which the State's BURDEN is proof of guilt, and disproof of self-defense, beyond ANY REASONABLE DOUBT. All of it: So, it appears the affidavit of complaint against Dalton "Chud the Builder" Eatherly has been made public, and the contents will ABSOLUTELY SHOCK many of you. FIRST SHOCKER: THERE IS NOT A SINGLE WORD ABOUT DALTON HAVING UTTERED ANY RACIAL SLUR TOWARDS JOSHUA FOX WHATEVER, SO AS TO HAVE PROVOKED THE FIGHT AND THUS TO HAVE LOST THE LEGAL JUSTIFICATION OF SELF-DEFENSE. NOT. ONE. WORD. That was Dalton's biggest potential vulnerability on self-defense, and we can now be confident that we can put that concern to rest. But it gets even BETTER for Dalton. SECOND SHOCKER: Even if self-defense IS NOT EVEN CONSIDERED, the Affidavit of Complaint fails to present ANY evidence-based narrative that Dalton has committed ANY CRIME WHATEVER. (But, of course, self-defense WILL be raised, only further buttressing Dalton's legal position.) Specifically, there's literally not a SINGLE WORD in this Affidavit of Complaint that describes ANY criminal conduct whatever. I've embedded the Affidavit in my possession, but for purposes of succinctness, the relevant portions reads: "... Dalton Eatherly and Joshua Fox engaged in a verbal altercation in front of the Montgomery County Courthouse." This is not a crime, unless it's merely the misdemeanor of disorderly conduct, which would apply equally to both Eatherly AND Foxx. And in any case Eatherly has not been charged with disorderly conduct (nor Fox, of course). "During this verbal altercation, Mr. Eatherly turned his body in a bladed stance towards Mr. Fox ..." There's nothing unlawful about taking a defensive stance when dealing with an angry antagonist. Certainly Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "taking a bladed stance." "... and reached for his firearm located in his right jacket pocket." Again, there's nothing unlawful about reaching for a firearm in one's pocket in preparation for possible necessary self-defense. Note that Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "reaching for a firearm in located in his right jacket pocket." "Thereafter, a physical altercation ensued." Note the passive voice. The "altercation ensued." There's no claim that EATHERLY initiated the "altercation." Indeed, if anything, to the extent the affidavit has detailed Eatherly's conduct, the absence of any representation of his conduct to indicate that it was EATHERLY who initiated the altercation, we can only infer that it was instead FOX who initiated the altercation. This would, of course, make Eatherly the VICTIM of Fox's unlawful attack upon him. The next paragraph: "Mr. Eatherly discharged his firearm, striking Mr. Fox multiple times." There's nothing inherently unlawful about discharging a firearm and shooting someone multiple times. Thousands of shootings that fit this description occur every year, and qualify as perfectly lawful self-defense. Of course, now self-defense need actually be put on the table. Then there's a discussion of Fox being flown to a hospital, followed by: "In addition, at the time shots were fired, there were several innocent bystanders in the area. Surveillance video fo the incident shows a ricocheting projectile hitting nearby walls." Again, there is nothing inherently unlawful about firing shots that miss the intended target. Police involved in lawful shootings of suspects routinely miss about 70% of the shots fired. Those shots ALSO go flying about the neighborhood until they hit something. None of that is a crime, absent evidence of recklessness--and the affidavit provides no statement of recklessness. Indeed, not a word of recklessness. Note that if the shots were fired in lawful self-defense, as a matter of law they were not fired recklessly. I would also note that there's not a word in this affidavit that even contests, much less contradicts, even a single legal element of Dalton's anticipated claim of self-defense. Not Innocence, not Imminence, not Proportionality, not Avoidance, and Not Reasonableness. Not a single element. Not a word of it. If this were a civil case, I would argue that this complaint fails to state a cause of action. Indeed, it's hard to recall the last time I saw an Affidavit of Complaint so utterly lacking in legal substance whatever. At this point I have to say that I've never felt more positive about Dalton Eatherly's claim of self-defense, at least based upon the representations of this apparently official "Affidavit of Complaint." If these facts provided in this Affidavit of Complaint are all the State of Tennessee has on which to prosecute Dalton on the attempted murder, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment, and malicious firearms possession charges brought against him, I simply don't see any prospect to any reasonable degree of legal certainty of prosecutors securing a conviction on any of those charges beyond a reasonable doubt on the legal merits. HEY! IF YOU LIKE THIS KIND OF USE-OF-FORCE LEGAL ANALYSIS, and would like to know more about how to be HARD TO CONVICT if YOU are ever compelled to defend yourself, your family, or your property against criminal predation, consider picking up a FREE copy of my best-selling plain-English book, "The Law of Self-Defense: Principles" (we only ask that you cover the S&H). lawofselfdefense.com/FREEBOOK @AmiriKing @ArchetypeTheory @JackPosobiec @DLoesch @Timcast @TheOfficerTatum @MyronGainesX @TateTheTalisman
English
Latto went live after giving birth to her baby and she revealed that 21 Savage left her at the hospital by herself after he made her take a DNA test and they found out he is NOT the father 😬👀
"He just left us all alone that's not fair to us"
"I don't know who the dad is yet"
English
D.Berry 🐎♐️🍊🍊🍊 retweetledi
Every week on rumble stream I will be giving away bitcoin randomly to someone typing in the chat. The chat always wins, time to give back!
English
D.Berry 🐎♐️🍊🍊🍊 retweetledi
🚨🔥KICK: @MyronGainesX And @AkademiksTV Gives An Entire BREAKDOWN And PREDICTION To Chud The Builder's Case.
"He Said He Misses His Girl? Don't Worry Bubba Or Tyrone Will Keep Him Company In Jail" "He's A Pussy" Says Akademiks.
@TheOSSGeneral
@WyronGaines
@myrongainesclip
@kick
English
D.Berry 🐎♐️🍊🍊🍊 retweetledi
It was a good discussion with @Akademiks!
REDPILL CLIPPERS@redpillclipperx
🚨🔥KICK: @MyronGainesX And @AkademiksTV Gives An Entire BREAKDOWN And PREDICTION To Chud The Builder's Case. "He Said He Misses His Girl? Don't Worry Bubba Or Tyrone Will Keep Him Company In Jail" "He's A Pussy" Says Akademiks. @TheOSSGeneral @WyronGaines @myrongainesclip @kick
English
D.Berry 🐎♐️🍊🍊🍊 retweetledi
D.Berry 🐎♐️🍊🍊🍊 retweetledi
D.Berry 🐎♐️🍊🍊🍊 retweetledi
D.Berry 🐎♐️🍊🍊🍊 retweetledi
D.Berry 🐎♐️🍊🍊🍊 retweetledi
