Daina Janitis

@JoJoFromJerz @FLOTUS Certainly sounds like a threat to me. Cheung or Miller, the Stevie-word-thugs, should be more careful about how they phrase things.

Your meal ticket is one of the single most divisive public figures in the history of the world. If you want to improve the public discourse, you should walk across the hall into his bedroom and start with him. Also, are you threatening a private citizen’s job because you don’t like something he said?

Kimmel’s hateful and violent rhetoric is intended to divide our country. His monologue about my family isn’t comedy- his words are corrosive and deepens the political sickness within America. People like Kimmel shouldn’t have the opportunity to enter our homes each evening to spread hate. A coward, Kimmel hides behind ABC because he knows the network will keep running cover to protect him. Enough is enough.  It is time for ABC to take a stand.  How many times will ABC’s leadership enable Kimmel’s atrocious behavior at the expense of our community.

Unbelievable. No one has to watch the Kimmel or Colbert shows - or my favourite Jon Stewart's Daily Show. Through them, however, we are reminded that some parts of America still have wit, intelligence, moral judgment, and a desire to reveal truth. Your "community" is not everyone's. BTW- who wrote this for you?

You’re describing an “us vs them” world that exists on both sides, not just “the Left.” Data on U.S. political violence since 2016 shows incidents from both left‑ and right‑wing extremists. No camp has a monopoly on either virtue or violence. There have been plots and attacks against Democrats and Republicans: from the 2020 far‑right kidnapping/assassination plot against Michigan Gov. Whitmer to attempts targeting conservative figures and Trump himself. None of that is acceptable, no matter who it’s aimed at. And Trump is not some uniquely dehumanized innocent bystander here. Studies of his speeches show heavy use of “us vs them” language and dehumanizing rhetoric about immigrants and opponents, which fuels the same polarization you’re blaming on “the Left.” That cycle is what’s dangerous.

A lot of what you’re listing is framing, not facts. Political violence and “us vs them” rhetoric have sadly come from both left and right in recent years, including plots and attacks against Democratic and Republican officials, and even assassination attempts against Trump himself. Trump’s own rhetoric has repeatedly dehumanized opponents and fueled that same polarization you’re blaming on “the Left.” Calling everyone who disagrees with you “fascist” just keeps the cycle going; it doesn’t change the reality that no side has a monopoly on either virtue or violence.

EVERY DEMOCRAT WANTS YOU DEAD. EVERY ONE. Every single one of them harbors this desire. They leave the physical act of pulling the trigger to others. The moment the bullet finds its mark, the masks drop and the celebration begins. "For the common good." "To protect our democracy." These are the same blood-soaked incantations they have recited since 2016. They will claim violence has no place in our politics while immediately pivoting to label MAGA as the real threat. The translation is clear. Your death is an unfortunate necessity demanded by the Republic. This represents the logical endpoint of a decade-long campaign of demonization. They call Trump Hitler. They label MAGA a cult. They equate border enforcement with racism and election skepticism with insurrection. Every institution they control from the media and academia to the DOJ and Big Tech has spent years programming their followers to view conservatives strictly as vermin. When the vermin start dying, the faithful refuse to mourn. They meme. They ratio. They trend phrases like "one down, millions to go." History is littered with regimes that spoke in the language of the common good while stacking bodies. The Jacobins, the Bolsheviks, and the Red Guards all began with noble rhetoric and ended with mass graves. The modern American Left has simply updated the vocabulary to weaponize terms like equity, sustainability, and the idea that democracy dies in darkness. It is the exact same meat grinder operating under new branding. Their rhetoric is its merciless clarity. It destroys the comfortable illusion of equal culpability between both sides. One side argues policy. The other side argues that your existence is a hate crime. There is no negotiating with that level of hostility. Reaching across the aisle is impossible when the opposition views the aisle itself as a moral obscenity. The path forward requires us to stop pretending. We must stop apologizing for noticing reality. We must stop ceding the moral high ground to people who cheer when we bleed. The shooting tonight is Exhibit A in the case for political realism. They want us erased. We want to win. Only one of those goals is compatible with survival.

x More than 60 post‑2020 lawsuits, including in front of Republican and Trump‑appointed judges, did not find evidence of the kind of widespread fraud that could change the result. Nationwide audits and recounts showed the vote counts were accurate, with error rates on the order of thousandths of a percent.T he federal agency in charge of election cybersecurity (CISA) called 2020 “the most secure election in American history” and found no evidence that voting systems deleted, lost, or changed votes. Furthermore ... You don’t have to like Biden or believe he’s a great candidate, but personal insults aren’t evidence, and repeating a disproven “stolen election” narrative is exactly how democracy gets weakened, not protected.

@DJanitis @WoodshopJoe27 @FinalTelegraph And let’s not get started on elections. It has been proven that the 2020 election was stolen. Biden the Alzheimer’s patient did not receive 81 million votes, this was not the most secure election in history. The Left went hard on anyone who said otherwise. Fascism.

You might want to review some facts... the National Trust filed the lawsuit for Historic Preservation—a nonprofit chartered by Congress in 1949 to protect historic sites. The judge ruled construction must halt because Trump bypassed required legal reviews, didn't seek congressional approval, and violated multiple federal laws including the National Environmental Policy Act. The judge found 'no statute comes close to giving the President the authority he claims to have' to demolish part of the White House and build a $400M addition without Congress. This isn't about aesthetics—it's about whether a president can unilaterally alter a national landmark without following the law."

@GuntherEagleman She did not file the lawsuit alone; so who is funding her litigation? That is where the real issue lies.

🚨 RICK SCOTT NAILS IT: “Trying to stop a ballroom? This is Trump Derangement Syndrome.” A federal judge actually halted White House ballroom construction because some liberal dog walker complained it was “ugly.”

Actually, the lawsuit was filed by the National Trust for Historic Preservation—a nonprofit chartered by Congress in 1949 to protect historic sites. The judge ruled construction must halt because Trump bypassed required legal reviews, didn't seek congressional approval, and violated multiple federal laws including the National Environmental Policy Act. The judge found 'no statute comes close to giving the President the authority he claims to have' to demolish part of the White House and build a $400M addition without Congress. This isn't about aesthetics—it's about whether a president can unilaterally alter a national landmark without following the law.

@GuntherEagleman Find the home of the liberal dog walker and then use the exact same court to have that house demolished because it is “ugly.”

Actually ...Actually... the lawsuit was filed by the National Trust for Historic Preservation—a nonprofit chartered by Congress in 1949 to protect historic sites. The judge ruled construction must halt because Trump bypassed required legal reviews, didn't seek congressional approval, and violated multiple federal laws including the National Environmental Policy Act. The judge found 'no statute comes close to giving the President the authority he claims to have' to demolish part of the White House and build a $400M addition without Congress. This isn't about aesthetics—it's about whether a president can unilaterally alter a national landmark without following the law.

@GuntherEagleman And yet we can’t get a talking filibuster or appointment approvals or the SAA passed but a dog walker can be offended and everything stops? Make that make sense… @LeaderJohnThune @SenateGOP

Yup...Actually, the lawsuit was filed by the National Trust for Historic Preservation—a nonprofit chartered by Congress in 1949 to protect historic sites. The judge ruled construction must halt because Trump bypassed required legal reviews, didn't seek congressional approval, and violated multiple federal laws including the National Environmental Policy Act. The judge found 'no statute comes close to giving the President the authority he claims to have' to demolish part of the White House and build a $400M addition without Congress. This isn't about aesthetics—it's about whether a president can unilaterally alter a national landmark without following the law.

@GuntherEagleman Public infrastructure disputes often get simplified online, but the legal issues are more complex.

Worth repeating...Actually, the lawsuit was filed by the National Trust for Historic Preservation—a nonprofit chartered by Congress in 1949 to protect historic sites. The judge ruled construction must halt because Trump bypassed required legal reviews, didn't seek congressional approval, and violated multiple federal laws including the National Environmental Policy Act. The judge found 'no statute comes close to giving the President the authority he claims to have' to demolish part of the White House and build a $400M addition without Congress. This isn't about aesthetics—it's about whether a president can unilaterally alter a national landmark without following the law.

@GuntherEagleman The injunction was not because someone said it was ugly. Judge Richard Leon halted above-ground work unless Congress approved it, with a carveout for genuine security needs.

I repeat - sorry - Actually, the lawsuit was filed by the National Trust for Historic Preservation—a nonprofit chartered by Congress in 1949 to protect historic sites. The judge ruled construction must halt because Trump bypassed required legal reviews, didn't seek congressional approval, and violated multiple federal laws including the National Environmental Policy Act. The judge found 'no statute comes close to giving the President the authority he claims to have' to demolish part of the White House and build a $400M addition without Congress. This isn't about aesthetics—it's about whether a president can unilaterally alter a national landmark without following the law.

@GuntherEagleman East Wing renovations happened quietly for years. Now ONE JUDGE says Congress must vote on beauty standards? Scott’s TDS call is spot on...build the damn thing. 🔥

Does Rick Scott not know the law? Oh...yes ... Actually, the lawsuit was filed by the National Trust for Historic Preservation—a nonprofit chartered by Congress in 1949 to protect historic sites. The judge ruled construction must halt because Trump bypassed required legal reviews, didn't seek congressional approval, and violated multiple federal laws including the National Environmental Policy Act. The judge found 'no statute comes close to giving the President the authority he claims to have' to demolish part of the White House and build a $400M addition without Congress. This isn't about aesthetics—it's about whether a president can unilaterally alter a national landmark without following the law.

@AmericanAlphaX @GuntherEagleman How did that happen? If anyone knows about robbing, it would be Rick Scott.

Rick Scott got ROBBED of the Senate Leader position! I’m still upset about that! The man who actually fights for America, cuts waste, and backs Trump gets sidelined while the usual insiders play their games. This is exactly why voters are fed up with the swamp. Scott earned it the Senate leader role and the RINOs screwed him. He was the people’s pick! Time to make it right!

Yup ... x.com/OrevaZSN/statu…

@ronnoc1952 @FinalTelegraph I’ll stick to facts; you can handle the animal noises.

@DJanitis @FinalTelegraph Scalded dog hollers

@johnnymaga God- if only they'd given him a position and kept his hands busy ...

Trump was once scouted by the Philadelphia Phillies during his time playing first base at the New York Military Academy. Most people have never heard about this.

How did America become a country weighing on some virtual scale their expressions of violent ugliness? There are such nasty thoughts and expressions "on both sides.": x.com/ArtCandee/stat…

Looks like we're ready to twist history again... After Charlottesville, there were three key Trump moments: – Aug 12: “Hatred, bigotry and violence on many sides” with no mention of neo‑Nazis or white supremacists. – Aug 14: Under pressure, a scripted statement explicitly condemning “the KKK, neo‑Nazis, white supremacists and other hate groups.” – Aug 15: At Trump Tower, he goes off script again: says there was “blame on both sides” and that there were “very fine people on both sides” of the Charlottesville protest, then tries to limit that to statue‑defenders while insisting the neo‑Nazis “should be condemned totally.” Defenders cherry‑pick the narrow disclaimer; critics look at the whole pattern: a reluctant walk‑back, followed by a return to both‑sides language and that “very fine people” line.

🚨BREAKING: President Trump just got 60 Minutes to air him exposing Democrats for FUNDING THE KKK. "Charlottesville was all funded by the Southern Poverty Law Center, and it was done to make me look bad." Follow: @BoLoudon

President Biden. 2020 Campaign Plot: In October 2020, before he took office, federal officials investigated a man, Alexander Hillel Treisman, who had plotted to kill Joe Biden and had traveled to within four miles of his Delaware home. 2023 Armed Threat: In August 2023, a Utah man suspected of threatening President Biden was shot and killed by FBI agents while they were serving a warrant. 2024 Travel Plot: In early 2026, it was reported that an Alabama man was accused of traveling to Atlanta with the intent to kill President Biden when he was in town for a debate in 2024.  President Obama had far more attempts of assassinations on his life than Trump. 🚨

Hey, Alln ...Ford News @FordJohnathan516h BREAKINGNEWS Republicans are trying to state President Obama or Biden never had assassination attempts. President Biden had 3 and Obama had up to 8 assassination attempts. Here they are. . 2008 Denver Plot: Three men were arrested for plotting to kill then-candidate Obama with a high-powered rifle during the Democratic National Convention. 2008 Tennessee Plot: Two white supremacists planned to kill Obama during his 2008 campaign. 2009 Istanbul Plot: A man was arrested with forged press credentials as part of a plot to kill Obama with a knife. 2011 White House Shooting: Oscar Ramiro Ortega-Hernandez fired shots at the White House in an attempt to kill President Obama, resulting in a 25-year prison sentence. 2011-2012 FEAR Plot: Members of a domestic terrorist group formed within the U.S. Army were arrested for conspiring to kill the president. 2013 Ricin Letters: Letters containing the deadly toxin ricin were mailed to President Obama. 2013 "Death Ray" Plot: White supremacists plotted to kill President Obama with a homemade radiation gun. 2018 Pipe Bomb: A pipe bomb was mailed to Obama and intercepted by the Secret Service

Republicans couldn’t stand Obama. Didn’t want him dead. Republicans thought Biden was a disaster. Never wanted him dead. Republicans believed Kamala’s completely unqualified. Never wanted her dead. That’s the difference. Conservatives fight ideas. We fight policies. We vote. We argue. We win or we lose. We don’t fantasize about killing the people we disagree with. That’s the DIFFERENCE!!!