DIE

「中国人ガー」はネットのイメージ。へずまみたいなバカが中国人だけを狙い撃ちにするのは家族連れや若い旅行者が多く、大人しくて反撃してこないから。白人や黒人には怖いから絶対に絡まない。

🇨🇳🇯🇵 China’s Quiet Nanjing Memorial Was a Strategic Choice: Not a Sign of Weakness China marked the 88th anniversary of the Nanjing Massacre this weekend with a noticeably low-key ceremony. - No major speeches - No fiery rhetoric - And notably, Xi Jinping did not attend Given the current diplomatic crisis with Japan over Taiwan, that wasn’t an accident. 👉 Here’s what’s really going on: China’s relationship with Japan is once again under strain after PM Sanae Takaichi suggested that a hypothetical Chinese operation against Taiwan could justify Japanese military involvement. In Beijing, that crossed a red line, not just strategically, but historically. The Nanjing Massacre is one of the deepest scars in modern Chinese memory. China officially places the death toll at 300,000, while even the post-war Allied tribunal put the figure at 142,000. But Nanjing was only one chapter. Across Japan’s occupation of China from 1931 to 1945, historians widely cite a total death toll of around 15–20 million Chinese, killed through massacres, bombing, starvation, forced labour and biological warfare. This wasn’t a single atrocity, it was a systemic trauma that touched nearly every region and generation. So when Japan’s leadership talks about military action around Taiwan, while parts of its political class continue to downplay or deny wartime crimes, Beijing hears something very different from “deterrence”. Against that backdrop, China could easily have turned the memorial into a full-blown nationalist spectacle. It didn’t. 👉 Instead: - The ceremony lasted less than 30 minutes - Doves were released - The language used was restrained - Xi stayed away - No direct mention of Takaichi by name That restraint is the story. Shi Taifeng’s remarks deliberately avoided escalation. He referenced history, but framed it in universal terms: opposition to militarism, defence of the post-war order and collective responsibility for peace. It was pointed, but controlled. This matters because Beijing is doing two things at once. First, it is reminding Japan that history is not abstract. When losses reach the scale of tens of millions, remembrance isn’t optional, it becomes part of national identity. That is why China will never forget, regardless of how much time passes. Second, it is denying Tokyo the escalation it may want. A louder, angrier memorial would have fed nationalist narratives on both sides. Beijing chose discipline instead. Even the PLA Eastern Theatre Command’s imagery, harsh, symbolic and unmistakable, reinforces the same point: the memory remains, but it is being managed, not unleashed. The memorial wasn’t quiet because China is weak. It was quiet because Beijing is playing the long game. History, strategy and restraint, deployed together.

2025年12月13日は、12回目の南京大虐殺犠牲者国家追悼日である。

琉球人的心声。

今年一番酷かった中国人はこいつだ。 自分はこれからも奈良を守ります。