@MVP1RACING@DUSTlMUS If you're a dude, Touch some grass kid. You don't need a study for this
If you're a woman, you're right 👍🏾 I have nothing to say to you
@DUSTlMUS google searched "average girl choosing laptop size color camera" and saw no studies or facts. the average height is 5'3" worldwide according to our world in data, fix that for future misuse
@bonesdzero@BrianAtlas First person=single person? I'm done with you. You either understand what I'm saying and trying hard to disagree or you are just really stupid. Wait way, I can't continue to engage with someone who can't hold a straight line in of thought without changing topic entirely
No, it's just a rationale for collective blame AKA prejudice. People only use it for groups they already want to be prejudiced against. This is why progressive feminists using this analogy for men then objected to Trump using it for immigrants.
1/2
@bonesdzero@BrianAtlas I know you desperately need to defend a cause that directly benefits you. But at the cost of your free mind, critical thinking, and common sense? That's a clear sign of mind control
@DManch8@BrianAtlas So you are comparing a organism in charge of collecting tax payer and work data but you believe that social media has the truth and that women should post more about this, otherwise is not true? Ok...
@bonesdzero@BrianAtlas Where's the correlation? Women talk about everything online. Yet we never hear first person "I am being paid less" or "I was paid less by this company". It's always third person "women are paid less" and " Bureau of bullshit. How does that have anything to do with experience?
@DManch8@BrianAtlas Like you have to experience something to know it happens? You must drink poison to know it would kill you? That's just childish or plainly ignorance.
@SovereignIM True. But the big questions remains: Why do (white) men even put up with this ?
As you said: the institutional machinery tilting the field in women’s favour. But the institutional machinery has been / was run by men. Why did they give everything up voluntarily ?
When feminists boast that women are outperforming men academically and professionally, they rarely mention the institutional machinery tilting the field in women’s favour.
In many sectors, when a man and a woman are similarly qualified, the woman is preferred because it serves diversity optics. The same applies more broadly under DEI logic, where selection is often shaped not by pure merit but by politically managed outcomes, rewarding female candidates over male ones, and non-white candidates over white ones, because that is what the system wants to display.
Then the same people point to the results of this engineered environment as proof that women are simply outperforming men, or worse, that men are innately falling behind. That is a fraud. If you build an institutional order that advantages women, penalises men, pathologises masculinity, and then present the downstream effects as evidence of female superiority, you are not describing reality, but laundering ideology through outcomes.
This is especially dishonest when applied to European men, who now operate in a cultural climate openly hostile to them. Some men will still rise through exceptional ability, force of character, nepotism, or by carving out paths outside the institutional system entirely. But that does not change the wider structure: the environment itself is increasingly inhospitable to men, and this has disastrous knock-on effects for mating.
The idea that men have suddenly become innately less capable is absurd. Across millennia, male variation has consistently produced a wider spread of outcomes, including a heavier concentration at the far right tail. That means more male outliers at the highest levels of abstraction, invention, and genius, just as it also means more failure at the bottom. The claim that men are now “falling behind” because they are naturally worse is not serious analysis, but regime propaganda.
What we are looking at is not organic female superiority. It is a managed narrative built on institutional preference, distorted incentives, and civilizational self-sabotage.
@DManch8@ConcernedMGTOW It isn't but the men have been so subdued by social media and porn that it's unlikely they will. All it would take is a million men walking off the job and halting the economy but they'll have to suffer before they get to that point unfortunately
South Korean men are fed up with the man-hating, misandrist, and abusive propaganda against men.
They are now actively protesting against all the man-haters.
@BigmummyAbby It is oh. Cos later now you'll be blaming "society" and "patriarchy" for your poor choices when people that studied the harder courses are running the world. We are just helping you
@hy_wemmy Aren't you worried about not having any other value? You're a full human being oh. If everyone sees you as just sex, maybe you are oh. This is 2026. Improve please 🙏🏾
Dating while celibate is crazy….the vibe is perfect all week then you mention your celibacy journey and suddenly effort and interest becomes nonexistent…..I’m tired 😭
@missmommymolly@Cr7Godbrand There's nothing to think fool. They say stuff, we observe and report. Stop telling us to shut up and don't report. We aren't your fucking puppies. Correct your fellow idiots if you don't want to be misunderstood rather than barking and telling everyone else to stay quiet
@Cr7Godbrand If you don’t understand feminism, than don’t speak on it. It’s not that complex but if you genuinely think feminists are excusing criminals because their women, then you do not understand feminism.
Whenever a woman gets attacked or abused by a man, women tell me that's why I need feminism.
The problem is, when a crime happens, feminists don't see a criminal, they see a man.
When the criminal is a woman, they see an exception. I can't support that mentality”.- Eva
@ConcernedMGTOW A bit too late unfortunately. There's no way to fix this without removing female votes so unless they do something drastic, it will continue