TheBlackWolfsDream

instagram.com/reel/Cq03mkAI9… #elektron #digitone #digitakt #techno #jam #aiart #audiovisual

@monzo What is going on with the app? When the issues are going to be resolved?

Join the 2025 1p Saving Challenge to save £667.95 and be in with a chance to win £10,000 🎉 We’ll automatically move money from your personal account to your Challenge Pot. 1p on day one, 2p on day two, and so on. So you can ditch the pen, paper and piggybank. Join the challenge now! 💸 For a chance to win £10,000, start by 31st January 2025, and have £667.95 (excluding interest) in your Challenge Pot by 11.59:59pm on the 365th day of your challenge. UK resident. 18+. One entry per person. Monzo personal account required. Ts&Cs apply (find on the Monzo app).

@beau_jazminx Hi

say 'hi' for my special nudys💕

@beau_jazminx @GamerGirlRosee ☝️

@GamerGirlRosee who is up for fun in DMs?🤭

sending anime nudys to everyone who says gm 😽

@elonmusk There’s another aspect within this. Mostly, people are thought to not think, but rather follow. Lots will take that, as it is easier when someone else does the thinking for them.

Blank Book myceliumnetworkdev.wordpress.com/2024/02/13/bla… via @theblackwolfsdream Out Of Body Experience reflections. #otherside #obe #consciousness #monroeinstitute

@the_kingslife 4

One Correct Answer Wins $2,000 Can you solve this ?? 👀 💭

@ylecun Depends which ones. State of education these days is questionable… and not everyone will be smarter because of availability of smart machines…

Professors make people smarter. Professors working on AI make people and machines smarter. Smart machines make people smarter.

@AshleyDCan Morning 24/7 since last week 😭

Good morning to everyone especially to the people who work hard 🌞

@Robyncwilson And Beebop hard to choose one 😂

@Robyncwilson GITS and AKIRA

@curiosityonx Pantofel

Curiosity rover spots a strange rock on Mars. What do you think it could be or looks like? 🧐🧐 twitter.com/WoahDudeScienc…

@emmsskyyy @mysteryplopper Focusing to long on the task starting to narrow our perception to the details we already figured out? Leaving it for a moment opens it up again and as we already got part sorted, it is set aside, and when we get back to our task rest comes up. Got the same in creative process.

@mysteryplopper Haha, yes, counter intuitive but true, i wonder why it works like this though - effort should get results in theory

The process of problem solving is eternally fascinating - one can look at the same thing for days, weeks, months, years and it wouldn't make much sense... then one day out of nowhere boom it's like your eyes got replaced, you see a new link and you solve the issue

@MelindaBChu1 @Jabippy @AISafetyMemes Problem lies in humans themselves. Most don’t even understand how their brains are functioning or anything else in their bodies. Education is the problem. Having kids and observing how and what is taught in school is really concerning.

We’re talking about making a physical product which takes human cognition and hundreds or thousands of steps using human hands to do 1 experiment.** Not including the series of experiments and dozens of humans needed to demonstrate efficacy in in vitro, in vivid studies (multiple animal models), etc. ** Don’t say: But the robots ‼️ Robots are nowhere near having the cognition or hand dexterity to do a complete scientific experiment on their own.

Reminder that the goalposts will never stop shifting And those who keep moving them never admit how many times they've done so I keep staring at these Yann quotes in disbelief. How could anybody read them and feel... comforted? He’s now openly admitting we’re going to be sharing the planet with a species smarter than us and isn’t worried about that. Maybe he’s right, but he’s literally gambling with human extinction! It’s also a gamble that the people are NOT okay with - 82% of Americans want to slow down AI.

@mezaoptimizer “Shitshow” can be done anyway. Even without open-source access. Indirect influences, manipulation and so on. Humans are very creative species when it comes to “shitshow”. We’ve been mastering this domain through centuries 😃

@AshleyDCan Every day we learn something new about ourselves 😂

I googled myself today and apparently I’m officially a hip hop artist

@dschan02 @ylecun Reward function is just safety system. It is quite logical to equip human, dog, elephant or anything else in one. Humans been lucky to get more sophisticated upgrade on top of it, but some still can’t find balance between them. So we got politics, racism and so on…

Do we have any way of predicting what a machine superintelligence's desires/drives will be? Humans evolved from a single reward function of "propagate your genes" yet this gave rise to religion, politics, racism, nuclear weapons, 'never gonna give you up' and 'ice cream so good'. We can set the reward function for AI but how do we know what the AI will actually desire?

Once AI systems become more intelligent than humans, humans we will *still* be the "apex species." Equating intelligence with dominance is the main fallacy of the whole debate about AI existential risk. It's just wrong. Even *within* the human species It's wrong: it's *not* the smartest among us who dominate the others. More importantly, it's not the smartest among us who *want* to dominate others and who set the agenda. We are subservient to our drives, built into us by evolution. Because evolution made us a social species with a hierarchical social structure, some of us have a drive to dominate, and others not so much. But that drive has absolutely nothing to do with intelligence: chimpanzees, baboons, and wolves have similar drives. Orangutans do not because they are not a social species. And they are pretty darn smart. AI systems will become more intelligent than humans, but they will still be subservient to us. They same way the members of the staff of politicians or business leaders are often smarter than their leader. But their leader still calls the shot, and most staff members have no desire to take their place. We will design AI to be like the supersmart-but-non-dominating staff member. The "apex species" is not the smartest but the one that sets the overall agenda. That will be us.

@AshleyDCan Morning!

Good morning to everyone especially to the people who are trying their best🌞

@ylecun @EmanuelDerman @dschan02 And where’s that confidence coming from? And someone doesn’t necessarily need to be directly involved. This someone could influence the outcomes. There’s so many ways to manipulate people.

@EmanuelDerman @dschan02 Bad actors are not at the forefront of AI research and development. So, the Good Guy's AI can take down the Bad Guy's AI.

@ylecun It doesn’t mean the way of approach is correct only because someone created a partnership to discuss something. It can be anyone 🤦‍♂️

Some folks seem to think I ignore or don't care about AI ethics, safety, and alignment. I need to remind them that a group of us co-founded the Partnership on AI in 2016 precisely to study, discuss, and address questions of AI ethics, safety, and alignment back in 2016. Cofounders included @erichorvitz (Microsoft) @demishassabis (Google/DeepMind), and Francesca Rossi (IBM). This followed a symposium on the Future of AI that I organized at NYU in early 2016, but discussions about PAI started at NIPS 2015. partnershiponai.org