Sabitlenmiş Tweet
iMackernakii🦉
7.4K posts

iMackernakii🦉
@DanAbbas01
﷽ Muslim🕋|InstitutionalFinancialMarketAnalyst📉📈||11:11 😌كُنْ قويًّا في الحياة، فإنّ الدنيا لا تَقبل للضعفاء iAnalyseiTradeiDesigniBuildiReadiWrite🤲🫂🏘🤲
Nigeria Katılım Eylül 2019
4K Takip Edilen884 Takipçiler
iMackernakii🦉 retweetledi

Risk isn’t reckless—it’s the price of an extraordinary life. Safe choices build small worlds. I take risk 4living
iMackernakii🦉@DanAbbas01
Sorry if I got distance... My life got real... I've goals that require my full attention
English
iMackernakii🦉 retweetledi
iMackernakii🦉 retweetledi
iMackernakii🦉 retweetledi
iMackernakii🦉 retweetledi
iMackernakii🦉 retweetledi

No book in human history has been memorized by more people than the Quran.
JM News Network@JMNewsNetwork_
The Quran is the world’s most memorized book in the 21st century.
English
iMackernakii🦉 retweetledi

This question may sound deep on the surface, but it falls apart because it is built on a big historical and theological misunderstanding.
The premise assumes that Islam claims God only speaks Arabic, or that Arabic is the only language of divine revelation. But in reality, both Islamic theology and secular history teach the exact opposite.
If we check mainstream academic books such as “The Aramaic Language of Jesus” by Dr. Sebastian P. Brock, or we check Angel Sáenz-Badillos's “A History of the Hebrew Language” these mainstream scholars proved
that the historical Jesus taught in Galilean Aramaic, while Moses received the Torah in Biblical Hebrew.
Even according to Christian and Western history, the Divine has always spoken to prophets in the native language of their direct audience. Arabic is simply the continuation of this exact historical pattern for the final Prophet, who happened to be born in Arabia.
To say "Allah only speaks Arabic" is to completely miss how the concept of divine speech works. If you look at profound African Christian scholarship, particularly Professor John S. Mbiti's book which he titled: Concepts of God in Africa, it was meticulously documented that African societies possessed a deep understanding of a single, supreme Creator long before foreign intervention.
Whether they call Him Olodumare, Chukwu, or Modimo, the Creator understands and hears every human being in their indigenous tongue. In Islam, a person can make personal supplication to Allah in Yoruba, Zulu, English, or Mandarin, and it is perfectly understood and answered.
This is why I make bold to say that the choice of Arabic is not a matter of cultural supremacy, but a brilliant masterclass in global sociolinguistics.
One book I find interesting here is Peter Trudgill's Sociolinguistics which he called: An Introduction to Language and Society.
He pointed out that, any global movement requires a foundational standard language to keep its core message from fracturing into thousands of conflicting interpretations over time.
Just as English serves as the universal language of global aviation today so pilots from Nigeria and Japan do not crash into each other, Arabic is preserved strictly as the universal language of Muslims’ ritual prayer.
It is a global stabilizer that ensures a Muslim from Lagos, a Muslim from Beijing, and a Muslim from Rio can stand in the same row and pray in perfect, beautiful unison without a single language barrier.
I hope this help clears your misunderstanding and confusion.
Allah knows best.
Zoom Afrika@zoomafrika1
"If Allah is the creator of all mankind, how come He only speaks Arabic?" ~Maponga Joshua III FoT
English
iMackernakii🦉 retweetledi

The five daily prayers are the most sophisticated anti-elite mechanism ever designed.
Every system of knowledge in human history has been gatekept. You want philosophy learn Greek. You want law go to the academy. You want spirituality find the monastery, pay the priest, climb the hierarchy.
Knowledge as power has always flowed through institutions that could be captured, corrupted, or bought.
Islam said : five times a day, every Muslim on earth stands in the exact same posture, says the exact same words, faces the exact same direction, with zero intermediary. The shepherd in Mali and the caliph in Baghdad are doing the identical act. No priest can sell you access. No institution can revoke your membership. No scholar
can stand between you and the prayer.
The ulema exist, the imams exist but the core transaction between the believer and Allah requires nothing they can provide and nothing they can withhold.
1400 years later every other spiritual tradition is struggling with institutional collapse, abuse scandals, gatekeeping accusations. Islam built the decentralization solution into the architecture from day one.
English
iMackernakii🦉 retweetledi

In Islam, the dead are generally buried directly in the earth because of spiritual, theological, and practical reasons rooted in the Qur’ān and Sunnah. Allah says: “From the earth We created you, and into it We shall return you, and from it We shall bring you out once again” (Sūrah Ṭā Hā 20:55). This verse establishes the natural cycle of human existence: we are created from the earth, we return to it after death, and from it we shall be resurrected on the Day of Judgment. Direct burial reflects this reality in a very profound way.
Islam also emphasizes humility and equality before Allah. Whether a person was rich or poor, powerful or weak, everyone is eventually washed, wrapped in a simple white shroud (kafan), prayed over, and returned to the earth. This simplicity reminds people that worldly status, wealth, and pride eventually disappear. The Prophet (ṣallāLlāhu 'alayhi wa sallam) encouraged Muslims to remember death and the Hereafter, and simple burials help preserve that spiritual reminder.
The Prophet Muḥammad ﷺ himself was buried without a coffin, and his companions followed the same practice. Because Muslims try to follow the Sunnah of the Prophet (ṣallāLlāhu 'alayhi wa sallam) as closely as possible, direct burial became the standard Islamic method. Islam also encourages that the deceased be buried as soon as reasonably possible, reducing unnecessary delays, expenses, and excessive funeral displays.
However, Islam does not absolutely forbid coffins. A coffin may be used when necessary, such as because of the laws of a country, transportation requirements, public health concerns, very soft or wet ground, or other genuine needs. Therefore, the issue is not that coffins are inherently forbidden, but rather that direct and simple burial is preferred whenever possible.
Islam also teaches respect and dignity for the human body even after death. The body is washed carefully, shrouded respectfully, and buried honourably. Extravagance in graves and funeral practices is discouraged because Islam seeks to prevent pride, social inequality, and attachment to worldly status even after death.
In a nutshell, as Muslims, we bury the dead without coffins because Islam emphasizes humility, simplicity, equality, returning naturally to the earth, and following the Sunnah of the Prophet (ṣallāLlāhu 'alayhi wa sallam). Nonetheless, coffins are permissible when there is a genuine need or legal requirement.
Chi chi♊@Igbomuslimgirl
In Islam, why are the dead not buried inside coffin? Please I really want to know...
English
iMackernakii🦉 retweetledi

So the skeptic here claims that the Quran plagiarised stories from the Bible. Yet somehow still got the story wrong, even though most academics are shocked at the levels of knowledge the Prophet had of Christian and Jewish traditions.
Now, here’s the fascinating bit, in the story of Joseph it somehow changed the title of the sovereign from Pharaoh, as in the Bible, to King.
The Quran also somehow makes a precise and consistent distinction in its use of titles for Egyptian rulers that happens to align with modern Egyptological findings.
When narrating the story of Joseph, it refers to the Egyptian sovereign as Malik (King), but when narrating the story of Moses, it uses Fir'awn (Pharaoh).
How did it know? Why did the Arab man in the small village make that distinction? Why did he take that risk?
The interesting thing, is this, distinction is historically very accurate:
the title "Pharaoh" only came into use as a personal designation for the Egyptian ruler during the New Kingdom period (from around the 18th Dynasty, ~1550 BCE onwards), which corresponds to Moses's era but postdates Joseph's .
The Bible, by contrast, applies "Pharaoh" anachronistically to both.
What makes this remarkable is that Muhammad's (pbuh) contemporaries, Arabian Jews and Christians, derived their knowledge of these narratives from biblical tradition, which makes the same anachronistic error throughout.
Had Muhammad, peace be upon him, simply borrowed from those sources, we would expect him to reproduce the same mistake.
Instead, the Quran corrects it consistently, using a distinction that was only recoverable through 19th century Egyptological research into hieroglyphics.
Explain..
JM News Network@JMNewsNetwork_
Korra: “The main reason why i believe the Qur’an is the final revelation of God is because it contains content that only God could have known.” Muslims believe the Qur’an is the final book.
English
iMackernakii🦉 retweetledi

Allah made it so you can say 'La ilaha illallah' without moving your lips.
It allows you to silently remember God anywhere, at work, while commuting, or in public - without anyone noticing.
This is an immense mercy. When a person is nearing the end of their life and may lack the physical energy to move their jaw or lips, they can still declare, "There is no deity worthy of worship except Allah."
Cynthia@Cynthia_TKD
Teach me something I don't know
English
iMackernakii🦉 retweetledi
iMackernakii🦉 retweetledi
iMackernakii🦉 retweetledi

No complicated trading knowledge.
Just connect, activate, and monitor.
If you’ve been looking for a way to enter the AI/crypto space early, this is honestly worth checking out before it gets saturated.
Start here👇
t.me/USDT_AI_Tradin…
#AI #Crypto #PassiveIncome #TelegramBot
English
iMackernakii🦉 retweetledi












