Daniel Lozovsky

Piers is so obsessed with Tommy Robinson that he keeps missing the real story. This wasn’t about one man. It was about thousands of people saying they’re sick of what’s happening to Britain — ignored victims, two-tier policing, open-border chaos, and being smeared for loving their country. Could Piers get that many people into the streets for anything? Exactly.

“Not invading” is not the only way a regime projects power. Iran doesn’t need to roll tanks across borders when it can fund, arm, train, and direct militias inside other countries. That’s the whole point of proxy warfare. Hezbollah in Lebanon. Houthis in Yemen. Militias in Iraq and Syria. Hamas and Islamic Jihad in Gaza. Calling that “less of a threat” because it doesn’t look like a U.S. invasion is exactly why Glenn’s framing is so weak. Different method. Same regional destabilization.

@DanielLozovsky @systemupdate_ @ggreenwald “By Glenn’s logic, if a hostile regime avoids directly blowing up civilians inside the U.S., then suddenly they’re basically harmless.” Yes, Daniel, compared to the type of conflicts U.S. initiates, Iran NOT invading other countries makes them much less of a geopolitical threat.

📌 "The U.S. has been ATTACKED many times over the last 30 years with horrific terrorist attacks—do you know how many of them have come from Iranian or Shia terrorists?" @ggreenwald asks MAGA apologist. The answer? "ZERO!" (Even the Jubilee fact-checkers agreed.)

So Hezbollah turning Lebanon into a permanent militia state, the Houthis attacking international shipping, Hamas massacring civilians, and Iranian-backed groups attacking rivals across the region is all just “helping people”? At some point “resistance” becomes a magical word people use to excuse literally anything.

@DanielLozovsky @systemupdate_ @ggreenwald By the way, when Iran decides to fund proxy resistance groups like Hamas, Hezbollah, Houthi’s, etc., they are helping those groups in their respective countries, who are getting bombed, invaded & coup’d by Western countries that take actions under the pretense of “freeing” them.

@biomance @systemupdate_ @ggreenwald If your standard is “violence is justified as long as you call it resistance,” then every extremist movement on earth can use the same excuse. That’s not morality. That’s tribalism.

Israel targets children and women civilians and never give warning. We’ve also found out they’re raping their hostages and prisoners. Those resistance groups exist solely to combat Israel’s terrorism. Iran has a right to defend itself. So do the Palestinians. So does Hezbollah and Hamas. They’re all resisting Israeli terrorism and have every right to fight back.

The U.S. is a global superpower with economic, military, and trade interests tied directly to the Middle East whether people like it or not. Oil markets, shipping lanes, terrorism, alliances, nuclear proliferation, and regional stability don’t magically stop affecting America because someone says “just leave.” The U.S. pulled back from Iraq and Afghanistan and the region didn’t suddenly become peaceful. Syria still collapsed. Yemen still collapsed. Iran still funded proxies. Hezbollah still existed. The Houthis still attacked shipping. Pretending America is responsible for “most” of thousands of years of Middle Eastern conflict is just another version of reducing the entire region to one outside actor.

@DanielLozovsky @STE98985418 @systemupdate_ @ggreenwald And the US isn’t in the Middle East and could just stop participating and being directly responsible for most of this clusterf!ck

⁉️ "We pay for their wars! We pay for those wars!" "It's in our interest that there is stability in the Middle East—" WHAT?! "The wars that Israel starts CREATE INSTABILITY, not stability." @ggreenwald outlines why Israel, not Qatar or the "Chamber of Commerce," is top of mind for so many Americans.

“Everything is just a reaction to Israel” is one of the most reductionist takes in modern geopolitics. The Middle East has agency, internal power struggles, sectarian conflicts, dictatorships, Islamist movements, and regional hegemonic ambitions that existed long before Twitter slogans.

@STE98985418 @DanielLozovsky @systemupdate_ @ggreenwald If the US could just butt out and stop destabilising the region, and offering Israel a blank cheque book - we’d probably see a whole lot less insurgency. Newton’s 3rd isn’t just for motion

@freddiexpott DOC

I'M LEAKING OUR LINKEDIN AUTOMATION SYSTEM: we've been been printing for the past 6 months with it - generated $700,000+ in revenue - booked me 2500+ calls - printed for clients too Comment "DOC" and i'll send it over asap (must be following + RT for priority access)

@megynkelly @ggreenwald You obviously watched a different Jubilee. He got b1tch slapped.

.@ggreenwald is so damned smart and absolutely crushed it on Jubilee. Really enjoying the clips. Very proud of you GG!

The problem here is people flattening 1930s European politics into modern American left/right categories. Nazism was an authoritarian collectivist ideology with massive state control, censorship, propaganda, militarism, industrial coordination, suppression of dissent, and subordination of the individual to the state. That is nothing like the American tradition of limited government, individual liberty, decentralization, free speech, and constitutional constraints. In Europe, Nazis were classified as “far-right” largely because they were anti-communist, ultranationalist, and ethnically focused — not because they resembled American conservatism. American conservatism historically trends toward:
smaller federal government,
individual rights,
free markets,
and skepticism of centralized state power. Ironically, if you push those ideas to the extreme, you move closer to libertarianism or even anarchism not total state control. So trying to map Nazi Germany directly onto modern U.S. politics is historically sloppy from the start.

A reminder that no serious historian, academic or anyone who has spent even minutes looking at Nazi Germany agrees with this. Hitler locked up the left, denounced the left. He was not a 'hardcore socialist.' The only people who say this are... Nazi sympathizers & the far right.

@PrajwalTomar_ @Lovable BUILD

BRO I JUST DID SOMETHING CRAZY. Client call ended 15 minutes ago. They already have a working prototype in their inbox. Granola transcribed the call → @Lovable read it and built exactly what they asked for → demo sent They haven't even opened their email yet lol Comment "BUILD" and I'll send you the full workflow + prompts. 👇

Funny how Glenn suddenly cares about people living inside media bubbles. This is the same guy who spent days turning every Middle East issue into: Israel controls America, Iran is just reacting, proxies are just anti-imperial resistance, and anyone worried about Iran is pushing propaganda. Yes, MAGA has blind spots. But so does the anti-Israel left. If your audience can explain every Israeli mistake in forensic detail but magically forgets Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, Iran, hostage-taking, rockets, and regional proxy warfare, that’s not independent thinking. That’s just a different bubble with better branding.

There was only one thing that surprised me about the Jubilee with MAGA die-hards. It wasn't that some people scream and refuse to stop talking. It wasn't that these were mostly young people cheering and finding purpose in wars but never fighting in them. It wasn't that their politics is more of a cult of personality. All expected and found in all factions. It was that, despite being political junkies, they had no idea about Trump's enormous corruption scandals because the corporate and independent media they consume doesn't mention it. They had no idea it existed:

Stop trusting system prompts to govern your AI agents. They're not policies. They're suggestions. Microsoft just open-sourced a real governance layer for agents — and it's the tool the entire industry has been fumbling toward for 2 years. What it actually does: — Intercepts tool calls before execution — Enforces rules in code, not vibes — Sandboxes execution environments — Zero-trust identity at the agent level — Covers the full OWASP Agentic Top 10 This isn't a prompt. It's infrastructure. The gap it fills: most teams shipping agents right now are governing them with a long system prompt and a prayer. "Don't access sensitive data." "Stay in your lane." That's not compliance. That's optimism. The uncomfortable truth: every production AI agent deployed today has a governance gap. System prompts are the first thing that breaks under adversarial inputs, model updates, and edge cases. They were never designed to be security controls. Code-enforced policies don't care about your prompt injection. If you're running agents in 2026 without a proper governance layer, you're not moving fast — you're moving reckless. One incident is all it takes to end the whole program. The real question isn't whether you need this. It's why it took until 2025 for someone to build it.

The Nakba is part of the history of the conflict. Nobody serious denies Palestinians experienced displacement and tragedy in 1948. What you are doing is taking a complex war involving: the collapse of the British Mandate, rejection of partition, civil war, invasion by multiple Arab armies, Jewish refugees from Europe and the Middle East, and decades of violence on all sides, and flattening it into: “evil foreigners arrived and stole everything.” That is activism, not history. Also ironic to call Jews “European refugees” while ignoring that over half of Israel’s Jewish population descends from Jews expelled or forced out of Middle Eastern and North African countries. History did not begin in 1948. And it definitely does not fit into a meme and one book cover.

@DanielLozovsky @systemupdate_ @ggreenwald Go study the Nakba and get back to us. The poor refugees we took in from Europe turned out to be land thieves and murderers. Your list is a list of the consequences of your land theft and ethnic cleansing.

What exactly do you think this proves? That Jewish refugees fleeing Europe after the Holocaust wanted a place to survive? Yes. Everyone knows that. The existence of Jewish refugees in 1947 does not magically erase: repeated Arab-Israeli wars, Palestinian leadership decisions, Hamas, Hezbollah, Iranian proxy warfare, terrorism, or 80 years of regional conflict. Posting a tragic black-and-white photo is not “context.” It’s emotional substitution for analysis. Real history is complicated. Not: “one picture explains the entire Middle East.”

@DanielLozovsky @systemupdate_ @ggreenwald You have zero context and no argument. Explain this:

Ben-Gvir saying reckless things deserves criticism. But the framing is always interesting: Israeli minister = war criminal instantly. Hezbollah firing rockets, embedding in Lebanon, dragging civilians into war = somehow just “resistance.” If you only recognize extremism on one side, you’re not doing analysis. You’re doing team sports.

🇮🇱🇱🇧 Israeli Minister Ben-Gvir: "We need to cut the electricity in Lebanon." This lunatic minister wants to plunge Lebanon into darkness. Ben-Gvir is a war criminal with a government seat.

@SiegersY @systemupdate_ @ggreenwald This is useless. See you.

@DanielLozovsky @systemupdate_ @ggreenwald You're just prolonging this for kicks, right?

So your grand foreign policy doctrine is: “If a conflict has historical roots, nobody is ever allowed to use force again.” Great. Let’s inform every government on earth that wars, deterrence, military alliances, and self-defense are now obsolete because human history is messy. Nobody is arguing for endless wars. The point is that the real world includes regimes, militias, invasions, terrorism, piracy, and proxy warfare. Pretending all conflict disappears if democracies just “don’t start wars” is not realism. It’s utopianism.

@DanielLozovsky @systemupdate_ @ggreenwald You can pretend to be like Rome and "never fight an offensive war," but I said don't start wars. The armed groups like the ones you cited for Iran came after the war we started by overthrowing the government. We did not then negotiate: we supported a dictator.

Using the phrase “false dichotomy” doesn’t make the point smarter. You still haven’t explained what your alternative is when diplomacy fails and armed groups keep using violence. If your answer is: “not belligerence,” that’s not a policy. That’s just a nicer way of saying: “I don’t want to answer the hard part.”

@DanielLozovsky @systemupdate_ @ggreenwald It really amazes me that you do not understand recognize what you are describing as a false dichotomy. The alternative to belligerence is not doing nothing.

Do me a favor: read something useful instead of getting your history from TikTok clips. “ISIS was created by America” is not serious analysis. U.S. policy mistakes helped create chaos in Iraq and Syria. That’s true. But ISIS was built by jihadists, Baathist remnants, sectarian networks, prison radicalization, Syrian civil war dynamics, Gulf funding streams, and regional power vacuums. Same with Iran and its proxies. History is complicated. TikTok turns it into: “America bad, Israel bad, everyone else innocent.” That’s not education. That’s algorithmic brain damage.

@DanielLozovsky @MTatersalad @systemupdate_ @ggreenwald Isis was created by America , and yes Israel just wakes up and bombs people. We have 2 recent events were Israel initiated an attack against Iran to which Iran responds. Not to mention continued bombing in Gaza that mainstream doesn’t cover during ceasefires

Are you from a different planet? Hezbollah, Hamas, the Houthis, and Iranian-backed militias are not neighborhood self-defense clubs. They target civilians, take hostages, fire rockets from civilian areas, attack shipping lanes, execute rivals, and help authoritarian regimes project power. Calling that “defending against imperialism” is just putting a Che Guevara poster over a missile launcher.

@DanielLozovsky @systemupdate_ @ggreenwald So they funds organizations that defend against Empiricalism? Iran sounds like the good guys.