Daniel Tuijnman 😷 🍉 #StopFakeNews 🇺🇦

Volg mijn Twitter-account @DanielDebunkt voor updates van nieuwe pagina's op mijn website. daniel-debunkt.nl

Wacht even, de “antisemitische terreuraanval” in London werd toch zogenaamd opgeëist door een “Iraanse terroristische groep” met video en logo en al? Nu is het afgezwakt tot "brandstichting" en worden de gevaarlijke "antisemitische terroristen" op borgtocht vrijgelaten. Dit moet echt uitgezocht worden en wie kan het beter dan @LeftLaser

Demonic Zionists are now trying to come after my European Research Council grant, which I won based on academic merit last summer. All because I say some hurty words about 'israel', their beloved genocidal colony. No matter what they do, I won't stop. telegraaf.nl/binnenland/haa…

@LeftLaser Gefeliciteerd!

Ben jij klaar voor meer kamer content?

@fentreactor67 @LeftLaser Marinus van der Lubbe is wel postuum gerehabiliteerd. 😁

@LeftLaser Een marxist in het regeringsgebouw is nooit een goed teken. De laatste keer dat dat gebeurde brandde de Reichstag af. Ik hoop wel dat de gevolgen vergelijkbaar zijn dit keer.......

Die is even slecht als de versneden versie. Wat een draak van een Nederlandse film. Ik en mijn vrouw hadden echt plaatsvervangende schaamte. De totale leegte van een rechtse boomer nostalgie voor het ‘linkse’ verleden met zoals gebruikelijk in Nederlandse films tenenkrommende >

Mandelson’s ‘properties’, is not quite right is it? The one in Wiltshire appears to have been rented to Peter ‘Mossad’ Mandelson by its owner Nat Rothschild. What was it Epstein said in that email? Oh yes, that he ‘represented’ the Rothschilds. And how did Mandelson refer to Zionist intel operative Epstein? Oh, yes, as his ‘chief life adviser’. And who did Mossad Mandy libby JP Morgan on behalf of when he was business secretary? Oh, yes, Nat Rothschild. I do hope there are no pictures of ‘Petey’ and Nat standing in front of that famous painting of ‘Satan summoning his Legions’!

From the UK government’s point of view, keeping the Palestine Action trials going is a win-win. If it can persuade a pliant enough jury to convict, it can say it was right all along to declare Palestine Action a terrorist organisation. If it doesn’t secure any convictions, it will argue that these failed trials prove that juries need abolishing – an agenda it is already pursuing precisely to stop juries acquitting people the government wants convicted for political reasons. Sadly, too many onlookers are falling for this legal charade, denouncing the jury’s decision in the Filton Six trial as if they know more about what happened at the weapons factory that night than the jurors who sat through 10 weeks of evidence and spent eight days deliberating on that evidence. That is a strange, unhealthy kind of self-regard – and too many people are currently engaged in it. A final point. Yes, juries can make mistakes. But that is highly unlikely to have been a problem in this trial. Miscarriages of justice typically occur when the jury’s own socially conditioned biases, bolstered by judicial and political pressures, take priority over the evidence, or when the evidence is rigged to secure a conviction. They happen in trials like the Birmingham Six and the Guildford Four in the 1970s, when a series of men were wrongly jailed for IRA-related bombings in UK cities simply because they were Irish. In these cases, the juries assumed that the police had not fabricated evidence and had not coerced confessions through torture. They were wrong. The legal system was more interested in securing a conviction than justice. The biases we hold as self-evident truths are always socially constructed – and the people who get to construct them are the political and media establishments that dominate the flow of information we receive from cradle to grave. Those same political and media establishments exert most pressure when they see their own class interests under threat. In short, the pressures on the jury in this case were in one direction only: to convict the Filton Six. Transcripts show the judge – the trial’s highest authority figure – barely hiding his own biases in favour of conviction. In refusing to convict, the jury had to set aside its social conditioning, the natural instinct we all share to defer to authority, and the wider social expectations fomented by the establishment media. The route of least resistance – the one most people take – would have been to have found all, or at least some, of the Filton Six guilty – not least Samuel Corner, who had been turned into a hate figure by the media. It is a sign of how strongly the evidence pointed in a different direction that the jury still refused to do as it was told. Read the rest of my latest article The jury were right to acquit the Palestine Action defendants. Here’s why: jonathan-cook.net/blog/2026-02-0…

A US federal judge ruled in favor of American activist Guy Christensen after Ohio State University expelled him for posting videos on TikTok criticizing Israeli practices in Gaza. The ruling confirmed that the university had violated Christensen’s right to free speech protected under the US Constitution. Legal organizations and human rights groups had previously considered Christensen’s expulsion under pressure from pro-Israel groups as unlawful and potentially damaging to his career, especially since his videos did not incite violence. The ruling orders the removal of any record of Christensen’s expulsion from his academic record. It comes at a time when the activist faced widespread pressure, including smear campaigns, the release of personal information about him and his family, and accusations from US Congress members, due to his solidarity activities with Palestinians in Gaza.

Dit is 100% gelogen en Boudry weet dat maar beslist toch om die leugen van de Trumpiaanse rioolkrant NYP te verspreiden.

Note she doesn't say she wants to get rid of "Gazans" or "Palestinians", but all Arabs everywhere - an ethnic group comprising 450 million human beings. Every single one of these people needs to be kept as far away from power as possible.

Echt woedend wordt ik zelden, maar als Diederik van Dijk in beeld verschijnt met weer een aanval op de mensenrechten begint mijn bloed te koken. Hoe haal je het in je Hersteld Hervormde kop om Francesca Albanese voor de bus te gooien, nadat je eerder UNWRA had gecanceld. Engnek.

Er komt een economische en financiële crisis op ons af van epische proporties en die wordt bij de @NOS geduid ‘vanwege de situatie in het Midden Oosten’. Nee, vanwege de eenzijdige aanval van #ApartheidIsrael en gechanteerde Vazalstaat de VS op #Iran.

Pfoe, wat laat @LeftLaser goed zien hoe de politieke elite, zélfs wanneer geconfronteerd met de feiten, wegkijkt van de existentiële dreiging die Israël vormt voor NL en de mensheid. Markuszower, BBB, Wilders, JA21, SGP, FvD… Allemaal durven ze de waarheid niet te erkennen.

21-month-old Jawad Abu Nassar was detained alongside his father by Israeli forces in central Gaza — and returned to his family ten hours later, alone. Doctors found wounds on his legs consistent with cigarette burns and signs of torture. The Israeli military denies abusing the child, and says his father — who remains missing — was a Hamas member who used him as a human shield. It has not publicly provided evidence to support that claim. Watch the full report from @sparkomat ⬇️. Warning: contains some distressing images. youtube.com/watch?v=kbc7RI…

ALWAYS the 'human shield' bullshit. ALWAYS. Not even Nazis used this lame excuse to justify their crimes. The father was NOT in a combat situation so he COULD not even have used the child as human shield. And even if we for argument's sake assume that he did and you managed to liberate the child, that still doesn't explain the child's burn marks. You guys do much worse things to children, you rape them, kill them, so it's definitely not unlikely that you tortured this child.

Goede kritiek op deze absurditeiten! nporadio1.nl/nieuws/binnenl…

Het is bijzonder hoe propaganda alle haarvaten van de samenleving kan infecteren. Nu betekent verzet tegen genocide en neofascisme dat je wordt uitgesloten van betrokkenheid bij bevrijdingsinitiatieven. Omgekeerde wereld!

Misschien moet je dan niet gaan? En het is geen vliegdekschip, maar een fregat. De Nederlandse marine heeft helemaal geen vliegdekschepen. Jij als minister van Defensie moeten weten. Ongelofelijke omhooggevallen turbotrut.

De leus “Death to the IDF” zorgde voor verontwaardiging onder de (pro) zionisten en Israëlische lobbyisten hier in Nederland. Dezelfde groep mensen zwijgen over het feit dat het Israëlische leger samenwerken met Joodse kolonisten en ze bieden bescherming aan kolonisten om de Palestijnse huizen en voertuigen in brand te zetten.