Danny Copus

Probably the only unwise thing he ever said … although, let’s be honest, it’s tough to really know exactly what he said, and what’s been simply attributed to his name. Marcus Aurelius was not a communist. This sounds more like Karl Marx. Money isn’t ours? Possessions aren’t ours? Yes, they absolutely are. And they can be passed on to future generations. So, yeah, people do have something to lose. Some of us more than others, but all of us in some way. Even the time that is given to us, is lost with every second that passes. And even though we do not possess our family and friends, when we lose them, we certainly lose something. Marcus Aurelius was a very wise man, perhaps the wisest of all of the ancient Romans, but there are better, smarter, more thoughtful, deeper quotes. I hope not too many walk away from this one believing it, because nothing could be further from the truth. We shouldn’t need to devalue such things in order to be fearless. There’s nothing brave about moving forward with something if you have nothing to lose. Bravery is moving forward with something when you know you have something to lose, but you do it anyway. Big difference.

Innocents matter more then criminals

Shaq did dominate the Finals for each of the 3-peat titles. But, it was Shaq’s team at that time, so the offense was run through him. He couldn’t have done it without Kobe, though, and neither could have done it without one another. Just look at Game 4 of the Finals versus Indiana. In Indiana, Shaq fouled out in overtime, and Kobe Bryant coming off of a badly sprained ankle, which caused him to miss part of Game 2 and all of Game 3, told everyone to calm down and proceeded to dominate in overtime, giving the Lakers the win. When given the opportunity in each of those Finals, Kobe shined. And then he went on to build a legacy of his own, winning back-to-back with less talent than Shaq’s Miami Heat title or any of LeBron’s. Anyway, I’m ok with bumping LeBron out of the top 5. Steph beat him more times, and I’d rather have Magic or Kareem on my team. But, I think it’s tough to pick a player who was actually better than Kobe at his best, other than Jordan. Kobe at his best was 81 points, or 62 points in 3 quarters in the same season. He scored 40 points 9 games in a row, and 50 points 4 games in a row … and he had a record tying 9 All-Defensive First Team selections (LeBron only 5). Kobe was also robbed of multiple MVPs (Steve Nash??? 🤦🏻‍♂️). Love Magic, Shaq was dominant for a long time, but ultimately didn’t win as much and wasn’t clutch. Tough to put anyone ahead of Kobe Bean Bryant, but I appreciate the thoughtful reply. 👍🏼

@DannyCopus @NBA I agree with you over LeBron not being 1 or 2. I also agree with you that Jordan is #1, and by a country mile. But when you say that Kobe won three in a row, you should really say that SHAQ won three in a row... In short, I don't think Kobe is #2. And LeBron may not be top 5.

Top 12 @NBA players of all time: 1. Michael Jordan 2. Kobe Bryant 3. LeBron James 4. Magic Johnson 5. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar 6. Steph Curry 7. Tim Duncan 8. Larry Bird 9. Wilt Chamberlain 10. Shaquille O’Neal 11. Jerry West 12. Hakeem Olajuwon Don’t even talk to me about how LeBron James should be #2, and you’d better not even say a word about him being #1. That’s just silly. The people who know best are Lakers fans who watched both men play every night, Kobe for 20 years, and LeBron for 8 years going on 9. LeBron went to a lot of finals in a row, back in the day, but all in the weak Eastern Conference, and I know that’s still very difficult to do, but let’s be honest, the East was horrible for like more than a decade, and the proof was that his team kept getting through that conference, but losing to the West. Kobe Bryant played with less talent for 2 of his 5 championships, and throughout his career faced much tougher competition in the playoffs, winning 5 of 7 NBA Finals. He also won 3 in a row, and then came back years later to win back-to-back again. He was a much better score, he was a better defender, and he was a better competitor and winner. Also, whenever Kobe matched up man-to-man with LeBron, he would dominate him. In regular season games, in the All-Star game, his team didn’t always win, but he himself would always outplay LeBron when they were guarding one another. Just watch the All-Star game and their last game at Staples. Let’s be clear, I’m not talking about whose team won, and I’m not even talking about final stat lines, I’m talking about who dominated whom when they were guarding each other. Nobody played the game as beautiful as MJ, except for maybe Kobe Bean Bryant. If you’re not from LA, or you didn’t have a league pass subscription to watch the Lakers as if you were from LA, you don’t know. Only people who watched these two players play every night know. Not even if you’re from Cleveland, and not even if you’re from Miami. You don’t know. Ask almost any NBA player, and they’ll tell you the same, they feared Kobe more. He is there next in line after Jordan. You can Google and YouTube countless videos showing NBA players saying exactly this. There is no better judge than them. Now, go do yourself a favor, and watch some highlights. Amazing stuff. Nothing like it in the League today.

🇦🇷 Guillermo Galetti steals scrap metal and turns it into art. The name "Scrap Thief" is well earned.

Elon is 💯% correct on this.

No other president has ever been as candid as Donald Trump. He ain’t perfect, that’s for sure, but he does have some redeeming qualities that actually ARE good for the American people.

Fallen angels, the Nephilim, and the bloodline of "the men of renown." Sean Stone just walked Tucker through the strangest story in religious history, and the part that gets you is how many cultures tell the exact same one. Stone pulled from the Book of Enoch, the ancient Jewish text describing Lucifer and 300 angels who came down to Earth, fell in love with human women, and produced offspring called the Nephilim. According to Enoch, their bloodlines became the great leaders of old. Emperors. Kings. Royal dynasties. Christianity itself rests on the framework. Jesus is described as the product of spirit and a human woman. God and Mary. The Greeks had Hercules and Achilles, born of gods and mortals. The Hindus, the Mesopotamians, the Egyptians, all the same template. When a single story shows up across every continent and every era, the right question isn't "where did people get this crazy idea?" It's "what were they all responding to?" Source: @TCNetwork

@MarioNawfal More from our increasingly classless culture.

If I had seen this as a child, I would have been traumatized forever.

180 👏🏻

Apparently I do, because you’re not understanding in your own nor with simple explanations. I don’t support anyone who modest children. Are you referring to Trump? You really think that man had a thing for kids with all of the women he could get? Don’t be a fool. And, I don’t support him. I just vote against dumbass communists who can’t tell the difference between men and women and who raise taxes and open borders. Like I said, you’re a waste of time.

@DannyCopus @RickSanchezc731 @nbcsnl Dude you don’t need to post novels. Plus it’s ironic since you support someone accused of molesting children.

Season 51 Finale Joke Swap with Colin and Che!

Ancient sources described Helen as tall, luminous, pale-skinned, bright-haired, and so goddess-like that Trojan elders said she was worth a decade of war just to look at. Lupita Nyong'o is a talented actress. She is also about as far from that description as casting could get. Nolan built his reputation on authenticity, but this one is a hard sell.

Of course I don’t like arguing, I’m not the one jumping into your comments about other posts, am I? You’re the one jumping into mine. All of these other people are jumping into mine, trying to tell me how wrong I am or belittling me from the start, so of course I’m going to have something to say in return. I would very much prefer that these people mind their own business and say their own thing somewhere else, or get smart and actually understand what I’m talking about, that it is not funny to laugh at a joke about a grown man getting hard for a 14-year-old boy. What the hell has this country come to that people actually laugh at that and then defend it? Please. I’m not the one in the wrong here. As far as blocking people, though, like the moron who replied to you said I did, yes, I block people who chime in and are nasty from the very beginning. Blocking people who are instantly negative does not make me negative and it doesn’t make me weak. But there have been some people who have come in and said something negative and then blocked me so that I can’t respond. Now, that’s weak. So is all of this. The fact that people actually jump on this platform just to argue with people who they don’t know is really truly pathetic. Again, it’s one thing to defend yourself, like I’ve been doing, it’s quite another thing to come at someone, which is what you and everyone else here has done.

@RickSanchezc731 @DannyCopus @nbcsnl He just likes arguing and belittling other people.

@vintagefilm74 @RickSanchezc731 @nbcsnl Should I not block you after saying something is stupid as you just said? Should I give you the opportunity to waste more of my time, and to say something else dumb, that I’m going to feel compelled to clarify for you?

@vintagefilm74 @RickSanchezc731 @nbcsnl Yes, there are a lot of women out there who fall into the same category as some of these men, but I don’t want to talk about women that way, no matter how true it sometimes it, so I reserve it for the “men”.

@DannyCopus @RickSanchezc731 @nbcsnl Females watch it as well. I found the MJ part cringe but this is what SNL does. It’s been this way for my whole life. 51 years of tasteless humor 🤪🤪🤪

You’re either a robot or not reading anything I’ve said correctly. I’m not focusing on Trump’s relation to Epstein, because Trump was NOT a pedophile. Bill Gates probably was. He visited the island, and he couldn’t get women in his own. What Insaid about SNL stands. Go make your own post.

@DannyCopus @nbcsnl The focus on @realDonaldTrump's involvement with Epstein, rather than say Bill Gates, is a complete political hit piece. The evidence doesn't support what SNL did. You need to assess the reality and stop the hit pieces, now! facebook.com/share/v/1JfJUQ…

Yes, and I stated my opinion to SNL. YOU WEREN’T PART OF THAT CONVERSATION. YOU INJECTED YOURSELF INTO IT, because YOU just couldn’t help yourself. I don’t care what YouTube viewers think. SNL has a whole audience laughing. It doesn’t prove me wrong. You’re not proving me wrong. You’re chiming in, on something you’re fundamentally wrong about, and not understanding very basic obvious explanations as to why you should mind your own business. The jokes were highly inappropriate and completely classless, and it shows a lack of talent and discretion and the state of our society that after all of the Epstein stuff, so many people can normalize and laugh at a joke about a grown man getting hard for a young boy. Good God. Understand? Your opinion doesn’t matter. You’re wrong, the audience was wrong, SNL was wrong, and 35,000 people on YouTube are wrong. And, yes, that’s my opinion, and you don’t have to step in to “correct” me, especially when your opinion is contrary to basic decency. The fact that you’re arguing against me instead of for me says enough. It is clearly immoral, what they were joking about. We just have a lot of sick people in our country, and you’re defending them. So, congratulations, you’re as awful as they are. Have a great week ahead.

@DannyCopus @nbcsnl AND. THAT. IS. **YOUR** OPINION. What I'm pointing out TO YOU (deeply sorry about that... I'll seek counseling for the horrible indiscretion), is that, despite what leaning-conservative X might have you believe, is that many others disagree with you. Again, sorry not sorry.

Of course you have a right to an opinion, but you don’t need to be interjecting on other people’s comments to argue with them. Make your own post in response to the video. Understand? I’m responding to you, because you interjected, but I’m not chiming in on other people’s comments just because I see them and disagree with them. I’m responding to the original Saturday Night Live post. I’m not searching for comments from other people, for me to take a stab at and get into a debate over. But, you are. As are all of the classless clowns trying to defend disgusting “humor”. It’s not horrible to interject, but what good is it doing to do so just to disagree and start a confrontation with someone? Who cares if more people like it on YouTube than not? Look at the comments here on X. The last time I checked, more people here feel the same way as I do. And what does that matter anyway, what most people in an increasingly classless society think? That’s kinda the point, our standards have dropped drastically. They are talking about getting hard for a young boy. Are you seriously defending that? Are you seriously not understanding why someone might have a problem with that? Are the jokes inappropriate and tasteless, or aren’t they? Some of them are funny, and some of them are really really irresponsible. In today’s climate, to be joking about pedophilia is absurd, and you know it. Anyone here saying it’s OK, is either classless or disingenuous, but either way, definitely low-IQ. And I’m sorry, but if you can’t understand any of this, then that would apply to you as well. But I appreciate you trying. Good luck.

Wow!!! You've invented an entirely new way to characterize Replying to a post on Twitter, as many others have to your posts. It's now "CHIMING IN ON A POST!!" A horrible thing to do!! The shame! The shame! YOU have a right to an opinion. Apparently, in your world, no one else does. Hell w/ ya.

That’s great, thanks for pointing that out, but it’s irrelevant. Am I chiming in on your posts? Why don’t you mind your own business? All you’re telling me is that there are more liberal people on YouTube than there are on X, and whether or not those numbers pan out, one thing is for certain, there are a lot of trashy people on YouTube. There are aspects of the skit that are funny, but that doesn’t mean that everyone agrees with everything. People can give a thumbs up to something even though they might not agree with something within it. You and all the other people here harping at me are the ones with the problem. It’s perfectly reasonable for me, and most of the people here on X who have responded, to have a problem with the content of the comedy, especially talking about getting hard for a little boy. Have some decency. All you’re proving is that we have become a very indecent society. But we knew that before this skit, didn’t we?

@DannyCopus @nbcsnl On the YouTube upload of this it's currently 35,000 upvotes and 276 downvotes (1.2M views). Comments under the vid are almost universally laughing with Colin Jost and Michael Che and loving it. You didn't find it funny. A lot lot lot lot lot of people disagree with you.

@FckYouShoresy @nbcsnl At least I could … how are the ladies liking your low-IQ profile name and personality? I imagine not very well. Good luck to you anyway.

@DannyCopus @nbcsnl Get fucked, Danny

Evan has trouble interpreting people’s posts. I do not support a pedophile, nor do I support anyone who protects such a person. You have your facts wrong. And, you’re not paying attention to the post that you’re commenting on, which clearly criticizes such things and people joking about it too. Good luck.

@DannyCopus @nbcsnl You support a pedo, who protects pedos. Fuck off, dweeb.